Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
I disagree. I am a far better pediatric surgeon than a teacher. Our nanny (former teacher) engages my kids and has a skill set that neither DH (also a surgeon) possess. I don’t revile SAHPs at all. It simply is not in the best interest of society or my family to stay at home. And you are so far from having “raised the bar” on parenting that I actually laughed out loud.
Parenting is a relationship, PP, and not a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
I disagree. I am a far better pediatric surgeon than a teacher. Our nanny (former teacher) engages my kids and has a skill set that neither DH (also a surgeon) possess. I don’t revile SAHPs at all. It simply is not in the best interest of society or my family to stay at home. And you are so far from having “raised the bar” on parenting that I actually laughed out loud.
Parenting is a relationship, PP, and not a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
Pitiful low wages? I’m the 12 year nanny above and make $35/hr + benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We still have our nanny full time even though our kids are in elementary school. If we didn’t have Nanny our kids couldn’t do sports or piano lessons and would get stuck in aftercare. Also, nanny covers all sick days and school holidays as well as summer break. Our nanny was an elementary school teacher so she handles homework and tutoring too. Her hours shifted to noon to 6:30 plus a weekend date night. She now handles all the grocery shopping, ordering supplies, keeping kids schedules and payments for lessons, pays the weekly housekeeper, empties the dishwasher, prepares the kids lunches and bakes healthy snacks for them. She still does their laundry, linens and towels and cleans their rooms.
Every night, I come home to two kids whose homework is done (and in their backpacks) and piano practice out of the way.
An example of what nanny does for us: I freaked out on Friday night because I forgot my youngest had a close friend’s ice skating birthday party at 10AM the next day. Nanny said, “oh, I know - her gift is wrapped on the dining room table and Larla made her a beautiful birthday card. And her skates from last year were too small so [older kid’s] skates are cleaned and sharpened in the garage. I tucked her skating socks inside”.
Am I freaking lucky or what!!
I want your nanny. I want your life.
Same! Actually, I'd like the nanny to do my job, so I can do all of the parenting stuff!![]()
You actually can have that-easily!
So you quit, allow your company to hire the person of their choosing to do the job, and then become a SAHP.
NP here. I don’t want to quit my career. I want a nanny like this to handle this stuff so I can enjoy my time with my kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
I disagree. I am a far better pediatric surgeon than a teacher. Our nanny (former teacher) engages my kids and has a skill set that neither DH (also a surgeon) possess. I don’t revile SAHPs at all. It simply is not in the best interest of society or my family to stay at home. And you are so far from having “raised the bar” on parenting that I actually laughed out loud.
Parenting is a relationship, PP, and not a job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
Anonymous wrote:We still have our nanny full time even though our kids are in elementary school. If we didn’t have Nanny our kids couldn’t do sports or piano lessons and would get stuck in aftercare. Also, nanny covers all sick days and school holidays as well as summer break. Our nanny was an elementary school teacher so she handles homework and tutoring too. Her hours shifted to noon to 6:30 plus a weekend date night. She now handles all the grocery shopping, ordering supplies, keeping kids schedules and payments for lessons, pays the weekly housekeeper, empties the dishwasher, prepares the kids lunches and bakes healthy snacks for them. She still does their laundry, linens and towels and cleans their rooms.
Every night, I come home to two kids whose homework is done (and in their backpacks) and piano practice out of the way.
An example of what nanny does for us: I freaked out on Friday night because I forgot my youngest had a close friend’s ice skating birthday party at 10AM the next day. Nanny said, “oh, I know - her gift is wrapped on the dining room table and Larla made her a beautiful birthday card. And her skates from last year were too small so [older kid’s] skates are cleaned and sharpened in the garage. I tucked her skating socks inside”.
Am I freaking lucky or what!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
![]()
People just don't want to take care of their kids or can't afford to stay home. It is as simple as that. So, these parents feel happy if parenting is outsourced to someone else - someone who is making pitifully low wages. It then automatically equates parenting to a low-wage earner job.
SAH parents elevate parenting from a low-wage earner job to the most important job in the world. Besides many are people with high SES and they can "afford" to sacrifice a paycheck to be with their children. That becomes a tough act to follow. That is why SAHPs are reviled by WOHPs, because they raise the bar on parenting while flexing their financial muscle.
Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We still have our nanny full time even though our kids are in elementary school. If we didn’t have Nanny our kids couldn’t do sports or piano lessons and would get stuck in aftercare. Also, nanny covers all sick days and school holidays as well as summer break. Our nanny was an elementary school teacher so she handles homework and tutoring too. Her hours shifted to noon to 6:30 plus a weekend date night. She now handles all the grocery shopping, ordering supplies, keeping kids schedules and payments for lessons, pays the weekly housekeeper, empties the dishwasher, prepares the kids lunches and bakes healthy snacks for them. She still does their laundry, linens and towels and cleans their rooms.
Every night, I come home to two kids whose homework is done (and in their backpacks) and piano practice out of the way.
An example of what nanny does for us: I freaked out on Friday night because I forgot my youngest had a close friend’s ice skating birthday party at 10AM the next day. Nanny said, “oh, I know - her gift is wrapped on the dining room table and Larla made her a beautiful birthday card. And her skates from last year were too small so [older kid’s] skates are cleaned and sharpened in the garage. I tucked her skating socks inside”.
Am I freaking lucky or what!!
I want your nanny. I want your life.
Same! Actually, I'd like the nanny to do my job, so I can do all of the parenting stuff!![]()
You actually can have that-easily!
So you quit, allow your company to hire the person of their choosing to do the job, and then become a SAHP.
Anonymous wrote:I’m so confused. So according to dcum: SAHM of school children = does nothing all day, waste of time. Nanny to school age children = priceless.