Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really sick of complaining parents.
This. So much this. Land the helicopter. Do something productive and stop with the creepy voyeuristic behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Folks, it's 2022. There is no excuse for having a trash video feed where you can't tell what's going on because it's so glitchy, or worse, one that is completely non-functional. If you're going to keep spectators out (which I don't necessarily disagree with), you at least need to have your tech up and running.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really sick of complaining parents.
This. So much this. Land the helicopter. Do something productive and stop with the creepy voyeuristic behavior.
Watching your child compete in a sport is neither creepy nor voyeurism, perhaps you should acquaint yourself with a dictionary if you insist on using the word 🙄
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really sick of complaining parents.
This. So much this. Land the helicopter. Do something productive and stop with the creepy voyeuristic behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some have much better feeds than others, with inset results, clear video, and and a dedicated, audible commentator. Others are total crap and it’s hard to tell which team swimmers are on, much less which swimmer might be yours or who touched the wall first. Any audio detectable over ambient noise may as well be Charlie Brown’s teacher. “Whomp a whomp whomp whomp.”
A lot of that has to do with the facility. It’s a lot easier to have a good quiet feed at gmu with a big scoreboard, a place for the video away from swimmers etc, then say at all providence with no scoreboard and a camera in the stands with the swimmers
To a point, I guess. But my kids had two different meets hosted by two different teams at GMU in December. First meet had a parent volunteer reading the heat sheet to let spectators know what was happening and where we were in the meet. Second meet was just ambient sound and you tried to hear what was coming next. That second meet had a concurrent feed showing the scoreboard, but it went on the fritz and got out of synch with the swim feed-- trying to stream two feeds from the car without wifi isn't going to work well. And the volunteer signup was full before our team even saw it, so don't bother just telling me to volunteer.
It doesn't take much to ask for a parent volunteer to read the meet sheet and try to relay some times.
Anonymous wrote:My kid swam at the NCAP winter qualifier. Very impressed with the live feed. Really liked how they identified each swimmer right before they swam and the results as each swimmer came in with their time. It was like watching the olympics. I am sure it was a lot of work, but appreciated it.
Anonymous wrote:Really sick of complaining parents.
Anonymous wrote:Our league has a real problem with the same parents getting early access to Sign Up Genius and filling all the volunteer slots. It's always the same people.
There's not much that parents can do to change this, if we can't volunteer and can't be physically present in the facility.
.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids were at a meet like this this weekend. If you don’t like it, email the team asap and offer to narrate the meet all weekend. I don’t want to do that, so I don’t complain.
I have! No response.
Please disclose the team then. No way I believe you offered to be at our meet - or any other meet - this weekend from 8 a.m. on Sat AND Sun to around 3:00 p.m. both days. I did see people suggest on the nonworking feed comment section something like, "Can't you get parents to sign up for volunteer spots to narrate?" That's not the kind of volunteering I mean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some have much better feeds than others, with inset results, clear video, and and a dedicated, audible commentator. Others are total crap and it’s hard to tell which team swimmers are on, much less which swimmer might be yours or who touched the wall first. Any audio detectable over ambient noise may as well be Charlie Brown’s teacher. “Whomp a whomp whomp whomp.”
A lot of that has to do with the facility. It’s a lot easier to have a good quiet feed at gmu with a big scoreboard, a place for the video away from swimmers etc, then say at all providence with no scoreboard and a camera in the stands with the swimmers
To a point, I guess. But my kids had two different meets hosted by two different teams at GMU in December. First meet had a parent volunteer reading the heat sheet to let spectators know what was happening and where we were in the meet. Second meet was just ambient sound and you tried to hear what was coming next. That second meet had a concurrent feed showing the scoreboard, but it went on the fritz and got out of synch with the swim feed-- trying to stream two feeds from the car without wifi isn't going to work well. And the volunteer signup was full before our team even saw it, so don't bother just telling me to volunteer.
It doesn't take much to ask for a parent volunteer to read the meet sheet and try to relay some times.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids were at a meet like this this weekend. If you don’t like it, email the team asap and offer to narrate the meet all weekend. I don’t want to do that, so I don’t complain.
I have! No response.