Anonymous wrote:Any more sightings? Did he shave off his mustache and go incognito yet?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lets get real. Whether whatever is occurring is about protection or an investigation, posting on this board does not help with either. It is simply about people being gossipy. If someone is asking whether someone remains in the govt, then they are idiots. Simply google the question.

Here’s a tip: if you don’t like people talking about something, you can just ignore it.

Exactly. He’s no longer in government. If need be he should purchase a more tactically east to defend home. People here posting have to slow down for all the government vehicles parked willy nilly hanging out of his driveway since he lives on a main artery. He should hire his own security. I think he’s under investigation though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lets get real. Whether whatever is occurring is about protection or an investigation, posting on this board does not help with either. It is simply about people being gossipy. If someone is asking whether someone remains in the govt, then they are idiots. Simply google the question.

Here’s a tip: if you don’t like people talking about something, you can just ignore it.

Anonymous wrote:Lets get real. Whether whatever is occurring is about protection or an investigation, posting on this board does not help with either. It is simply about people being gossipy. If someone is asking whether someone remains in the govt, then they are idiots. Simply google the question.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.

It still none of your business.

It became our business the day he took a government paycheck. As a taxpayer I don’t want to pay for protection for Trump or any of his lackeys. If gossiping about the goings on at his home makes him feel less secure so be it. I’m hoping he’s under investigation though.

No. Government employees should be protected from crazy nutjobs who want to kill them, because even the kindest person in any position of visibility will have credible threats made against them at some point. It's just the nature of things. So we need to protect everyone in those high-visibility positions, even the ones who are themselves crazy nutjobs.

And, yes, we've got to assume it's a safety issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.

It still none of your business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.

It still none of your business.

It became our business the day he took a government paycheck. As a taxpayer I don’t want to pay for protection for Trump or any of his lackeys. If gossiping about the goings on at his home makes him feel less secure so be it. I’m hoping he’s under investigation though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.

It still none of your business.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

You are assuming that he’s under protection and not investigation. Which could be the wrong assumption.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.

Totally agreed. This is not "Metropolitan DC Local Politics". This is someone's personal security notwithstanding his politics or draft dodging status.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is simply inappropriate. I am no fan of this supposed protected person, but no one should be posting online updates about ss protection. Stupid gossip. No one else's business.