Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the immortal words of Judge Elihu Smails "Well, the world needs ditch diggers too".
Except that taking out loans is the path towards becoming the proverbial ditch digger… Except in today’s world that translates into needing a thousand side gigs just to make rent. Abd for the truly unfortunate it’s not even to make rent—it’s to bake their student loan payments.
Anonymous wrote:In the immortal words of Judge Elihu Smails "Well, the world needs ditch diggers too".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only difference between loans and savings is time. This is also an article about whether it makes sense to pay for a private degree, even without loans, if you can get a degree of similar value from a state school. The answer depends on the kid and on what you’re really buying, but in a lot of cases the answer is no.
I see your point about loans vs. savings. But taking out large loans as you get closer to retirement age is a bit riskier. If you didn't (or couldn't) save, and all of a sudden take out $100k in parent loans at a 6% rate when you're 50, that's gonna cost you $850 a month for 15 years, and in all likelihood, that money is essentially less money that you're saving for retirement.
I think there is a place for parent loans, particularly if you've had a large increase in income. Let's say you really wanted to save for college, but you made $100k. Your kids are 12 and 16. You managed to save $5k a year since the little one was out of daycare at age 4, so you've been saving for 8 years and have $40k, with some appreciation plus some random gifts, etc, it's now at $60k. You get a raise and, now make $150k. The next two years, you put aside $30k for college, so now you have $120k.
Your kids want to go to schools that cost $50k per year all in. You can cash flow $30k of that. You take $20k a year out of your savings to pay for the rest. You're going to run out of money the last two years. You take $40k in parent loans to cover it ($20k per year). Well, you can just "keep paying for college" for two more years and totally wipe out that debt. Totally worth it IMHO - assuming the educations your kids are getting are worth $50k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The article says …
That may mean attending a community college for three years and transferring to a better school as a senior.
![]()
Who thinks CC is 3 years. Also not all credits transfer. Jeez
um yeah, that's not how it works, at least here. UMD takes 60 credits max from 2y schools. And that doesn't mean that all 60 are applicable to the degree.
My DD just graduated from Montgomery CC and she is able to transfer all 60 credits to UMD. It is absolutely doable. You just have to know what you're doing.
My son graduated from NVCC and transferred to George Mason with 60 credits too. He got some scholarships at GMU as well. He got a "small" loan we helped to pay. No debt. Double!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The article says …
That may mean attending a community college for three years and transferring to a better school as a senior.
![]()
Who thinks CC is 3 years. Also not all credits transfer. Jeez
um yeah, that's not how it works, at least here. UMD takes 60 credits max from 2y schools. And that doesn't mean that all 60 are applicable to the degree.
My DD just graduated from Montgomery CC and she is able to transfer all 60 credits to UMD. It is absolutely doable. You just have to know what you're doing.
Anonymous wrote:The only difference between loans and savings is time. This is also an article about whether it makes sense to pay for a private degree, even without loans, if you can get a degree of similar value from a state school. The answer depends on the kid and on what you’re really buying, but in a lot of cases the answer is no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only difference between loans and savings is time. This is also an article about whether it makes sense to pay for a private degree, even without loans, if you can get a degree of similar value from a state school. The answer depends on the kid and on what you’re really buying, but in a lot of cases the answer is no.
State schools use loans (after pell grants) as a starting point for financial aid. Some private schools use grants to meet need. Her first example is Iowa instate vs Yale and she says Iowa is the better deal. Yale meets all need with grants, Iowa would require loans. She (or the author) is clearly out of touch.
But if you have the money, and your choice is full pay at Iowa or full pay at Yale, you come out of Iowa with a lot more money still in your bank account. If you want to be an accountant in Des Moines, it’s hard to see why you should pay for Yale.