Anonymous wrote:Nissan is perfect for someone that wants to buy a new transmission!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mazda’s are typically a nightmare to work on. Plus the SkyActive high compression DI engines beat themselves to death.
Ha?! Could you explain it more? The engine part… I should just look it up, I guess.
Just look it up.
Search “intake valve carbon fouling on Mazda DI engines” or “SkyActive engine compression issues”
I think a lot of people who buy Mazda’s don’t really know much about cars. They buy them because they’re pretty (they are pretty). But I understand engines. And there is no F’ing way I’d keep a Mazda after 50k miles or so.
If you don’t plan to, great. Have at it. But if you plan on putting 100k or more on it, find something else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mazda’s are typically a nightmare to work on. Plus the SkyActive high compression DI engines beat themselves to death.
Ha?! Could you explain it more? The engine part… I should just look it up, I guess.
Just look it up.
Search “intake valve carbon fouling on Mazda DI engines” or “SkyActive engine compression issues”
I think a lot of people who buy Mazda’s don’t really know much about cars. They buy them because they’re pretty (they are pretty). But I understand engines. And there is no F’ing way I’d keep a Mazda after 50k miles or so.
If you don’t plan to, great. Have at it. But if you plan on putting 100k or more on it, find something else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mazda’s are typically a nightmare to work on. Plus the SkyActive high compression DI engines beat themselves to death.
Ha?! Could you explain it more? The engine part… I should just look it up, I guess.
Just look it up.
Search “intake valve carbon fouling on Mazda DI engines” or “SkyActive engine compression issues”
I think a lot of people who buy Mazda’s don’t really know much about cars. They buy them because they’re pretty (they are pretty). But I understand engines. And there is no F’ing way I’d keep a Mazda after 50k miles or so.
If you don’t plan to, great. Have at it. But if you plan on putting 100k or more on it, find something else.
Interesting! What cars do you like in the large-sedan/small SUV category?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mazda’s are typically a nightmare to work on. Plus the SkyActive high compression DI engines beat themselves to death.
Ha?! Could you explain it more? The engine part… I should just look it up, I guess.
Just look it up.
Search “intake valve carbon fouling on Mazda DI engines” or “SkyActive engine compression issues”
I think a lot of people who buy Mazda’s don’t really know much about cars. They buy them because they’re pretty (they are pretty). But I understand engines. And there is no F’ing way I’d keep a Mazda after 50k miles or so.
If you don’t plan to, great. Have at it. But if you plan on putting 100k or more on it, find something else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nissan is for people without the credit to get something else.
Why do you say that?
Because that's their reputation now. What they lack in performance or features they makeup in the ability to finance underwater loans as part of the purchase.
Hmmm - that is not sustainable…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mazda’s are typically a nightmare to work on. Plus the SkyActive high compression DI engines beat themselves to death.
Ha?! Could you explain it more? The engine part… I should just look it up, I guess.