Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 20:11     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Assuming central office employees and McKnight will wear the masks they have provided us when they enter schools?


Well, Since McKnight has admitted via her massive email that she has COVID and is quarantining, I assume she won't need to worry about further herself.


It's so dangerous right now. You think she'd realize this after getting covid herself and act accordingly.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 20:10     Subject: Re:Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Of course not


Are you a teacher or do you just not believe teachers?


I do.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 20:08     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:Assuming central office employees and McKnight will wear the masks they have provided us when they enter schools?


Well, Since McKnight has admitted via her massive email that she has COVID and is quarantining, I assume she won't need to worry about further herself.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 19:44     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Given Hogans screw up with testing at the start of this, not a surprise.

You can get legit N95 off Amazon.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 17:55     Subject: Re:Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

I am a parent and I am appalled at MCPS shenanigans. McKnight has been nothing short of a disaster
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 17:14     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:Unbelievable. And it is clear from the pictures that they are low-quality masks. Way to put teachers and staff in danger, MCPS.


I’m as pissed at MCPS as everyone else is, but they’re not putting people at risk. People who were already wearing legit N95, KN95 or KF94 masks aren’t the ones who needed a mask from MCPS, and people who have been wearing inadequate masks are no worse off with yet another inadequate mask. There’s no way MCPS could get enough certified respirator masks for the whole district on short notice.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 17:13     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

I just read an article that 60% of the kn95 masks tested did not meet filtration standards. So it’s possible.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 17:09     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Assuming central office employees and McKnight will wear the masks they have provided us when they enter schools?
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 17:04     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Unbelievable. And it is clear from the pictures that they are low-quality masks. Way to put teachers and staff in danger, MCPS.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:55     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Oh wow, yeah. Go here: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/usernotices/counterfeitResp.html. Expand "Counterfeit Respirators Listed 2020" at the bottom. Do a find for "Shenzhen."

(Thanks, dude on Reddit.)
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:51     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

I see some images in this Twitter thread (linked to by the guy who wrote that post on Reddit): https://twitter.com/EricHerboso/status/1479606537022754816
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:46     Subject: Re:Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

The main thing is we received one. I mean, of course I have been buying my own masks because that is what everyone has been doing during this whole thing. I appreciate the mask MCPS gave me, although I guess it's possibly counterfeit. However, it's ONE DISPOSABLE mask.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:46     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is true, these are counterfeit. I never opened my mask and have the packing here:

Product Name: Particulate Respirator
Shenzhen Ende Medical Tech
Manufactured in China
Model:EN-05
GB2626-2006

It’s NOT on the approved list of CDC approved kn95 masks.

Is it what is pictured here? https://www.eu-esf.org/personal-protective-equipment/143-non-compliant?start=101 (do a find on the page for GB2626-2006)


No that’s not it. Currently trying to find an image online.
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:44     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

More info about the MCPS masks (and claim that they are likely insufficient) here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MontgomeryCountyMD/comments/rymosm/mcpsprovided_masks_are_made_by_counterfeiting/
Anonymous
Post 01/09/2022 16:43     Subject: Multiple speakers on townhall claim KN95s given to teachers were not FDA approved/were counterfeit

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is true, these are counterfeit. I never opened my mask and have the packing here:

Product Name: Particulate Respirator
Shenzhen Ende Medical Tech
Manufactured in China
Model:EN-05
GB2626-2006

It’s NOT on the approved list of CDC approved kn95 masks.

Is it what is pictured here? https://www.eu-esf.org/personal-protective-equipment/143-non-compliant?start=101 (do a find on the page for GB2626-2006)


From the website above:
1. Rapex 2020 23 Particle filter mask 9901 GB2626-2006 KN95
(Rapex respiratory protection)
... Type / number of model: 9901 GB2626-2006 KN95 Counterfeit: UNKNOWN Risk type: Health risk / other The particle/filter retention of the material is insufficient (measured mode value ≤ 92.7 ...
Created on 05 June 2020