Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.
Hucker co-sponsored with Riemer an amendment to Jawando’s proposed ZTA to upzone every single lot in this county. Not a chance in hell I would vote for him. First, he should know better than to team up with Riemer on anything. Second, it’s just irresponsible behavior from someone trying to position themselves as the responsible choice. So no thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Elrich beat Blair in the last primary by fewer than 100 votes.
I'm going to vote Blair. I dont' want Elrich for sure, and Hucker and Riemer seem similar though perhaps with slightly better management competence. Blair is a somewhat unknown, but I'm willing to take that risk.
Except.. I'm a registered independent so I guess I"ll have to wait until the general once the elction is alredy effectively decided.
Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.
Anonymous wrote:Hucker is the only choice for having a true visionary progressive. Elrich is too wed to caring about people’s housing values.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.
Elrich, Hucker, and Riemer are all the same, IMO. Unethical and self-serving. I don't know about Blair because he is exactly that -- an unknown.
Do I choose the devil I know or the devil I don't?
Hans is definitely different. He's a YIMBY extremist, the other two are more moderate on development.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.
Ditto.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.
Elrich, Hucker, and Riemer are all the same, IMO. Unethical and self-serving. I don't know about Blair because he is exactly that -- an unknown.
Do I choose the devil I know or the devil I don't?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
This Democrat will vote for almost anyone other than Hans.
Anonymous wrote:I’m voting for Hans because we need more housing, everywhere, anywhere, every day of the week. Build, baby, build.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any republican contenders?
From the article: “14% of Montgomery’s voters are Republican”
They are asking if there is a Republican contender, someone running, not the amount of voters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are there any republican contenders?
From the article: “14% of Montgomery’s voters are Republican”