Anonymous wrote:DH has a couple of charges for impersonating a postal carrier and, unrelated to those incidents (misunderstandings), unauthorized use of beekeeping equipment, honey and honey by-products. Still, even months after these events, people judge him as less than. It is not fair and indicative of a larger problem in "your" society.
Anonymous wrote:It depends what the specific circumstances were and what he learned from them, OP. I wouldn't write off such a person automatically, but I'd be wary going forward. A lot of people with ADHD, anxiety, depression, self-medicate that way. So for the ADHD, he can get diagnosed and treat himself with medication, for example, to prevent further abuse of drugs. But know that he could have a disorder of that kind, and that it would need to be managed, since none of them can be "cured".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser. Is that the kind of parent you’d want for your kids? Sounds like you are making excuses for him.
The convictions themselves are not the issue. The issue is: he thinks laws do not apply to him.
The fact that he got caught not once, but 3 times, should tell you: he chose to commit way more than 3 offenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser. Is that the kind of parent you’d want for your kids? Sounds like you are making excuses for him.
The convictions themselves are not the issue. The issue is: he thinks laws do not apply to him.
The fact that he got caught not once, but 3 times, should tell you: he chose to commit way more than 3 offenses.
Anonymous wrote:He’s a loser. Is that the kind of parent you’d want for your kids? Sounds like you are making excuses for him.
Anonymous wrote:I’m in the age bracket where DCUM would tell me to lower my standards (or the softer version, “broaden your horizons”)
I’ve been going out with a guy who is handsome, gainfully employed with a few (legal!) entrepreneurial side hustles (though I would be the bread winner in the partnership, at least at first). He is fun and laid back. He did however just disclose to me that he has a record - one DUI and two nonviolent drug offenses. I’m of the mind that drugs should just be legal anyway and that while DUIs are bad, they are unfortunately common. That being said, I don’t know this guy well enough to know whether it’s a matter of reformed decisions and since having gotten his life in order, or if this is a huge red flag that he’s bad news. For a 34 year old, is this something I should just let slide?
Anonymous wrote:You say you don’t know the circumstances. I would ask him to explain what happened and make a decision after that.
FWIW my H has a DUI and nonviolent drug offense. They’re from 20 years ago when he was very young, had weed on him, and was profiled due to his race. Was not driving drunk. I was okay with that. Driving drunk over the age of like 22? Not okay with that. Drugs other than weed? Nope. Anything that could affect his ability to get a job? Pass.