Anonymous wrote:OP writing. I agree about the school's communication.
The person is an administrative assistant with no formal training who has added community 'facilitator' to their responsibilities at the school.
Thanks for the thoughts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP writing. Thanks for all the input. Unfortunately, I don't think I heard anyone chime in about where I stand insofar as objecting to MY kid.
A couple of questions came up -- not sure why these facts matter. Then again, DCUM can be vicious, so I am not surprised.
This is non-teaching staff. A part-time community facilitator or somesuch. Not a counselor of any type. I pointedly said non-teaching staff in order to establish that this is not a teacher that my kid would encounter in the normal course of school activities. The label I chose was not intended as pejorative.
The school has a good counseling element. My kid knows the people there informally and is comfortable going there on their own.
I have zero interest in preventing other kids from hanging out with this staff member. That was an incorrect presumption of some posters. Just thinking of MY kid. Other kids can have at it.
Anyway, if anyone knows about parental rights here, I'd be grateful.
I'd be alarmed, OP. Do you know what formal job mr. candyman has within the school? Or are they some sort of volunteer?
Anonymous wrote:OP writing. Thanks for all the input. Unfortunately, I don't think I heard anyone chime in about where I stand insofar as objecting to MY kid.
A couple of questions came up -- not sure why these facts matter. Then again, DCUM can be vicious, so I am not surprised.
This is non-teaching staff. A part-time community facilitator or somesuch. Not a counselor of any type. I pointedly said non-teaching staff in order to establish that this is not a teacher that my kid would encounter in the normal course of school activities. The label I chose was not intended as pejorative.
The school has a good counseling element. My kid knows the people there informally and is comfortable going there on their own.
I have zero interest in preventing other kids from hanging out with this staff member. That was an incorrect presumption of some posters. Just thinking of MY kid. Other kids can have at it.
Anyway, if anyone knows about parental rights here, I'd be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:OP writing. Thanks for all the input. Unfortunately, I don't think I heard anyone chime in about where I stand insofar as objecting to MY kid.
A couple of questions came up -- not sure why these facts matter. Then again, DCUM can be vicious, so I am not surprised.
This is non-teaching staff. A part-time community facilitator or somesuch. Not a counselor of any type. I pointedly said non-teaching staff in order to establish that this is not a teacher that my kid would encounter in the normal course of school activities. The label I chose was not intended as pejorative.
The school has a good counseling element. My kid knows the people there informally and is comfortable going there on their own.
I have zero interest in preventing other kids from hanging out with this staff member. That was an incorrect presumption of some posters. Just thinking of MY kid. Other kids can have at it.
Anyway, if anyone knows about parental rights here, I'd be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:OP writing. Thanks for all the input. Unfortunately, I don't think I heard anyone chime in about where I stand insofar as objecting to MY kid.
A couple of questions came up -- not sure why these facts matter. Then again, DCUM can be vicious, so I am not surprised.
This is non-teaching staff. A part-time community facilitator or somesuch. Not a counselor of any type. I pointedly said non-teaching staff in order to establish that this is not a teacher that my kid would encounter in the normal course of school activities. The label I chose was not intended as pejorative.
The school has a good counseling element. My kid knows the people there informally and is comfortable going there on their own.
I have zero interest in preventing other kids from hanging out with this staff member. That was an incorrect presumption of some posters. Just thinking of MY kid. Other kids can have at it.
Anyway, if anyone knows about parental rights here, I'd be grateful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid the same age. Nothing about this is normal.
Candy to build a community?
Exactly. This sounds like grooming. Parents will not really know what's going on there. No kid wants to get labeled a snitch.
We don't even know who these people are luring the children with candy. SP
“Grooming? “Luring”? More information would be helpful. I’m near the other end of the continuum — imagining a counselor with a candy jar on their desk.
Anonymous wrote:My 10-yo child's DC-based private school has introduced a formal community-building effort, which includes dedicated staff and space.
Instead of taking recess outdoors, as they are encouraged to do, my kid has opted to visit this staff, who invite students for conversation, offering candy and cookies, which is the notable element in my kid's telling (subject for another post).
Setting aside the merits of this practice, what standing do I have to object? If I tell the school I don't want my kid engaging with this staff, how enforceable is it? The contract with the school doesn't shed light on it.
Thanks for any input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid the same age. Nothing about this is normal.
Candy to build a community?
Exactly. This sounds like grooming. Parents will not really know what's going on there. No kid wants to get labeled a snitch.
We don't even know who these people are luring the children with candy. SP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid the same age. Nothing about this is normal.
Candy to build a community?
Exactly. This sounds like grooming. Parents will not really know what's going on there. No kid wants to get labeled a snitch.