Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one with a contrarian, obstinate kid who refused almost all proffered help/guidance (including an executive function/ADHD coach, language tutor, SAT class, college counselor, tho reluctantly let us read essay after big resistance)? So kid who is smarter than all get out (except in some ways it matters most, like accepting help when needed), is going to end up at a much less selective school than his IQ would predict, because of his less than perfect gpa, and probably his less than perfect application, which we didn’t review because he wouldn’t show us, except for the essay. It is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know if OP is talking generally about education or asking specifically if you wished you were more involved in the college search. If it's the latter, it's pretty obvious that the better your student is, the less help they need. If they're a loser and not a candidate for top schools, you need to be more hands on or they'll end up at a place that isn't worth the money etc. If they're a top student, they don't need a lot of help.
Wow, when did those not a candidate for top schools become losers?
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one with a contrarian, obstinate kid who refused almost all proffered help/guidance (including an executive function/ADHD coach, language tutor, SAT class, college counselor, tho reluctantly let us read essay after big resistance)? So kid who is smarter than all get out (except in some ways it matters most, like accepting help when needed), is going to end up at a much less selective school than his IQ would predict, because of his less than perfect gpa, and probably his less than perfect application, which we didn’t review because he wouldn’t show us, except for the essay. It is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know if OP is talking generally about education or asking specifically if you wished you were more involved in the college search. If it's the latter, it's pretty obvious that the better your student is, the less help they need. If they're a loser and not a candidate for top schools, you need to be more hands on or they'll end up at a place that isn't worth the money etc. If they're a top student, they don't need a lot of help.
Anonymous wrote:Am I the only one with a contrarian, obstinate kid who refused almost all proffered help/guidance (including an executive function/ADHD coach, language tutor, SAT class, college counselor, tho reluctantly let us read essay after big resistance)? So kid who is smarter than all get out (except in some ways it matters most, like accepting help when needed), is going to end up at a much less selective school than his IQ would predict, because of his less than perfect gpa, and probably his less than perfect application, which we didn’t review because he wouldn’t show us, except for the essay. It is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:My regret is not pushing them harder in high school for better grades.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I get the whole let kids figure out their own lives, but they are still very young to be making all these decisions themselves. One day, some will probably wish their parents would have provided more guidance. On the other hand, some parents claim they don’t provide guidance, but do in subtle ways. I have a kid who went through the admissions process last year and got into his top choice ED while many kids struggled. And, to some degree, I think his result reflected help from us regarding his application strategy. A lot of kids get to college admissions and realize important things too late. For example, that schools have certain course rigor, GPA, and testing requirements. But, in senior year, it’s too late to change those things. Suddenly, they may be left with unappealing choices. It’s hard to get the balance right - obviously no one wants their kid and themselves to be miserable for 18 years - but I think a parent needs to use their larger vision of life, including options and consequences, to help a child navigate big decisions.
Sounds good, and validates your purpose, but it’s really overkill in today’s society. Even parents who profess not to micromanage today, are far more involved than parents of yesteryear. That’s why you see so much more mental health issues and medication with todays youth. Maybe it’s a function of advanced diagnostics, but my hunch is the overbearing parents and their unwillingness to let the kids figure it out. Too much pressure to please parents and fulfill parents desires…speaks more to the parents than the kids…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope. DH and I each have multiple degrees from Ivies etc etc, but we did not want our kids to be hothouse flowers. We let them do the things they liked and not do the things they hated. We gave support when needed academically (e.g, a few months of math tutoring if they were struggling), but urged them to focus on doing their best without making themselves crazy, not on grades.
DC1 now at a top 50 SLAC and very happy. DC 2 a HS senior and a bit more academic; applying to schools in top 20 and (we hope!) will get into several. Both kids are good humans, kind and funny and creative and smart and resilient.
Maybe they'd both have ended up at HYP if we had enrolled them in math enrichment, violin and Mandarin from an early aged and pushed them from one lesson or sport to another. But I doubt they would be happier people or better humans. I am confident that they will have successful lives and careers regardless.
Why it is necessary to tell us you are Ivy graduates? And let me guess: the top 50 school your kid attends is a CTCL school.
Anonymous wrote:Nope. DH and I each have multiple degrees from Ivies etc etc, but we did not want our kids to be hothouse flowers. We let them do the things they liked and not do the things they hated. We gave support when needed academically (e.g, a few months of math tutoring if they were struggling), but urged them to focus on doing their best without making themselves crazy, not on grades.
DC1 now at a top 50 SLAC and very happy. DC 2 a HS senior and a bit more academic; applying to schools in top 20 and (we hope!) will get into several. Both kids are good humans, kind and funny and creative and smart and resilient.
Maybe they'd both have ended up at HYP if we had enrolled them in math enrichment, violin and Mandarin from an early aged and pushed them from one lesson or sport to another. But I doubt they would be happier people or better humans. I am confident that they will have successful lives and careers regardless.