Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I looked at the chart posted in the link (Thank you PP!) but it is not making any sense to me. My 6th grader's (gen ed advanced math) scores are in the high 1700s for both. It only goes tp 1650 and 8th grade. My kid is not at high school level lol. What useless tests are these? Provides no useful information to parents!
Keep in mind the math progression for your kid. Advanced Math in 6th grade is 7th Grade Honors math. 7th Grade Honors is 8th grade Math. So it is not unreasonable to assume that a 6th Grader doing well in Advanced Math might be at the 8th grade level on the VGA.
If you said that your son was in Gen Ed math and scored off the charts I would think there was an issue but a kid in Advanced Math understand concepts that are taught to 8th graders tracks with me.
Anonymous wrote:Back in the day, they used to have a chart that showed what number of questions you had to get right in order to get a passing score of 400. This was before they changed them to computer adaptive tests. If you actually calculated the percentage that you needed to score in order to get a 400, it was around 60%. So, yes, the bar is low. These test are designed to show that you've learned the essential skills, not every, single, little thing that is taught in your math or reading class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having the test information column split into lines like it went with the reporting categories and scores was very confusing.
Also I don't understand how my 4th grader can get a 1487 with a 2 out of 7 in Computation and Estimation. 11/17 on the others for a total of 13/24 in math that tested 3rd grade skills. The child is supposedly doing well in math, but I don't really believe it.
Yeah, I’m completely confused. My 4th grade AAP kid had 19/24 with 1602 score and this chart (not provided by FCPS) gives me no understanding of where he is. He’s allegedly doing great in math and it is his natural skill set but I’m concerned he doesn’t have the basics after seeing he hasn’t mastered this 3rd grade metric.
Yep, not my child's natural skill set, and we're already doing tutoring which just now got through second grade material, so 13/24 seems accurate. I just don't understand how that implies readiness for 4th grade material. The bar must be very low.
Anonymous wrote:I looked at the chart posted in the link (Thank you PP!) but it is not making any sense to me. My 6th grader's (gen ed advanced math) scores are in the high 1700s for both. It only goes tp 1650 and 8th grade. My kid is not at high school level lol. What useless tests are these? Provides no useful information to parents!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having the test information column split into lines like it went with the reporting categories and scores was very confusing.
Also I don't understand how my 4th grader can get a 1487 with a 2 out of 7 in Computation and Estimation. 11/17 on the others for a total of 13/24 in math that tested 3rd grade skills. The child is supposedly doing well in math, but I don't really believe it.
Yeah, I’m completely confused. My 4th grade AAP kid had 19/24 with 1602 score and this chart (not provided by FCPS) gives me no understanding of where he is. He’s allegedly doing great in math and it is his natural skill set but I’m concerned he doesn’t have the basics after seeing he hasn’t mastered this 3rd grade metric.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whoever made the decision not to provide parents with more context wasn’t thinking. All they did was create more questions for teachers who will have to field questions. Also the timing on the release is suspect too. Obviously, they want people to forget about it over Winter Break.
Sorry - meant to say they just created more work for teachers who will have to field questions. Not fully vaccinated yet this morning….
Anonymous wrote:Whoever made the decision not to provide parents with more context wasn’t thinking. All they did was create more questions for teachers who will have to field questions. Also the timing on the release is suspect too. Obviously, they want people to forget about it over Winter Break.
Anonymous wrote:Having the test information column split into lines like it went with the reporting categories and scores was very confusing.
Also I don't understand how my 4th grader can get a 1487 with a 2 out of 7 in Computation and Estimation. 11/17 on the others for a total of 13/24 in math that tested 3rd grade skills. The child is supposedly doing well in math, but I don't really believe it.
Anonymous wrote:Thank you for the info. I’m a teacher in the county with middle schoolers and I had no idea how to interpret what I was looking at. That explanation would have been nice to include fcps.