Anonymous wrote:What do they expect parents to do? This isn’t 2020 where everyone is virtual. Peoples jobs expect them to be in. What the hell do they do with their kids for 3 weeks? This is BS.
-teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The district that can least afford to do this does it again. Moronic
Hopefully the two weeks of learning at home won't hurt them.
“Learning”. Odds are slim this will only be 2 weeks. Give an inch they take a mile
Anonymous wrote:Yet sports stadiums are full and bars are open. These poor kids are being screwed because no one wants to do the difficult things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The district that can least afford to do this does it again. Moronic
Hopefully the two weeks of learning at home won't hurt them.
“Learning”. Odds are slim this will only be 2 weeks. Give an inch they take a mile
There's no way spread will be better by mid January. Spread is happening in the community, not in schools.
Schools are closed because there aren't enough teachers to teach the kids.
We should have made plans to keep teaching grades preK-3 in person no matter what else.
My kids grades 4 and 5 did OK with virtual. My younger kids did not.
Where are you getting this information that there are not enough teachers? I have heard this dire prediction several times on this thread, conjuring up fear mongering imagines of teachers dropping like flies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The district that can least afford to do this does it again. Moronic
Hopefully the two weeks of learning at home won't hurt them.
“Learning”. Odds are slim this will only be 2 weeks. Give an inch they take a mile
There's no way spread will be better by mid January. Spread is happening in the community, not in schools.
Schools are closed because there aren't enough teachers to teach the kids.
We should have made plans to keep teaching grades preK-3 in person no matter what else.
My kids grades 4 and 5 did OK with virtual. My younger kids did not.
Where are you getting this information that there are not enough teachers? I have heard this dire prediction several times on this thread, conjuring up fear mongering imagines of teachers dropping like flies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The district that can least afford to do this does it again. Moronic
Hopefully the two weeks of learning at home won't hurt them.
“Learning”. Odds are slim this will only be 2 weeks. Give an inch they take a mile
There's no way spread will be better by mid January. Spread is happening in the community, not in schools.
Schools are closed because there aren't enough teachers to teach the kids.
We should have made plans to keep teaching grades preK-3 in person no matter what else.
My kids grades 4 and 5 did OK with virtual. My younger kids did not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The district that can least afford to do this does it again. Moronic
Hopefully the two weeks of learning at home won't hurt them.
“Learning”. Odds are slim this will only be 2 weeks. Give an inch they take a mile
Anonymous wrote:If the state BOE/Hogan don't stop PGCPS, what would stop other school districts in Maryland from going virtual?
Anonymous wrote:Yet sports stadiums are full and bars are open. These poor kids are being screwed because no one wants to do the difficult things.
Anonymous wrote:This is garbage. We are prioritizing the wrong things, once again at the expense of our most vulnerable, kids. Schools go virtual, but kids are all over the place. It doesn't help control the spread!