Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Steps are not related to you. Let their family members send them gifts (or not).
Exactly, don't step-kids sometimes come out way ahead, because of having more family to dote on them?
Yes, they do, and it can be overwhelming to the step. It really sort of takes some of the fun out of it for the kid, or at least that is what I saw in my own stepson. He would get stuff from a whopping 3 sets of grandparents and two sets of parents, not to mention aunts and uncles. I tried to explain this to my parents, but they insisted on getting him stuff. I always insisted that when he was with us at my family's celebration, it was my and my husband's responsibility to provide something for him to unwrap. They never listened to me. It helped when he started spending Christmas with his mom, and then he grew up and it wasn't an issue any more.
I don't love the idea of forcing a relationship between steps and grandparents. My stepson is unlikely to have an ongoing relationship with my parents; in fact, he doesn't. And that's okay; he has perfectly lovely grandparents of his own. I know plenty of families do it differently, and that's fine, but it's not important to everyone.
What a weird reaction. There is nothing wrong with stepgrandparents giving their steps gifts. And was your stepson the only kid there? If not, did you expect the grandparents to give presents to the other kids and not the stepson? That’s terrible.
Its primarily the overwhelming number of gifts. No kid can appreciate that many gifts when they have 3+ sets of grandparents, and +10 aunts/uncles. The kid ends up getting a bunch of kids from extended step-family who don't have any idea what he would like. Parents can have a legitimate interest in discouraging step-grandparents from lavishing gifts on their step-grandkids when those kids end up having five or six Christmases. I don't question how it works in different families; to each his own. But there is not one definite right answer that fits every family situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the core complaint is that you didn't give as much of grandma than that is rude and he should cut it out.
If the core complaint is that you gave more to your blood nieces and nephews than to the step nieces and nephews than you're in the wrong.
It is hard to tell from your post because the kid being step or not is irrelevant if he first scenario is true.
I see what you're saying, he's the first nephew/grandchild. His (blood)brother just turned 1, and got a lot of stuff babies get for 1 year olds so it's tough to compare. I don't remember giving the 1 year old anything substantial (finger paint, board books, etc.)
Yeah, I'm realizing I should of said something when it happened, so now if I stop gifting him and continue to gift his brother it will look horrible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Step-grandma? Does that mean your mom sent him more???
Honestly, I would be inclined to stop all gifts after a bratty response like that.
Yes DH mom sent the $100, we sent $35. Which I thought was enough for a 10y/o.
He’s normally a great kid, this did catch me off guard.
^^^ But this is not really relevant to your question in the title. If you send your brother's kid $50, and your brother's step-kid $35, that would be the comparison. I don't have any step-kids in my family but I can tell you that my parents and my in-laws always spend more on their grandkids than we do on our nieces/nephews! I think if any of ours siblings did have step kids, we would probably spend the same amount on all of them.
Anonymous wrote:If the core complaint is that you didn't give as much of grandma than that is rude and he should cut it out.
If the core complaint is that you gave more to your blood nieces and nephews than to the step nieces and nephews than you're in the wrong.
It is hard to tell from your post because the kid being step or not is irrelevant if he first scenario is true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Step-grandma? Does that mean your mom sent him more???
Honestly, I would be inclined to stop all gifts after a bratty response like that.
Yes DH mom sent the $100, we sent $35. Which I thought was enough for a 10y/o.
He’s normally a great kid, this did catch me off guard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Steps are not related to you. Let their family members send them gifts (or not).
Exactly, don't step-kids sometimes come out way ahead, because of having more family to dote on them?
Yes, they do, and it can be overwhelming to the step. It really sort of takes some of the fun out of it for the kid, or at least that is what I saw in my own stepson. He would get stuff from a whopping 3 sets of grandparents and two sets of parents, not to mention aunts and uncles. I tried to explain this to my parents, but they insisted on getting him stuff. I always insisted that when he was with us at my family's celebration, it was my and my husband's responsibility to provide something for him to unwrap. They never listened to me. It helped when he started spending Christmas with his mom, and then he grew up and it wasn't an issue any more.
I don't love the idea of forcing a relationship between steps and grandparents. My stepson is unlikely to have an ongoing relationship with my parents; in fact, he doesn't. And that's okay; he has perfectly lovely grandparents of his own. I know plenty of families do it differently, and that's fine, but it's not important to everyone.
What a weird reaction. There is nothing wrong with stepgrandparents giving their steps gifts. And was your stepson the only kid there? If not, did you expect the grandparents to give presents to the other kids and not the stepson? That’s terrible.
Its primarily the overwhelming number of gifts. No kid can appreciate that many gifts when they have 3+ sets of grandparents, and +10 aunts/uncles. The kid ends up getting a bunch of kids from extended step-family who don't have any idea what he would like. Parents can have a legitimate interest in discouraging step-grandparents from lavishing gifts on their step-grandkids when those kids end up having five or six Christmases. I don't question how it works in different families; to each his own. But there is not one definite right answer that fits every family situation.
Anonymous wrote:Steps are not related to you. Let their family members send them gifts (or not).
Anonymous wrote:Step-grandma? Does that mean your mom sent him more???
Honestly, I would be inclined to stop all gifts after a bratty response like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Steps are not related to you. Let their family members send them gifts (or not).
Exactly, don't step-kids sometimes come out way ahead, because of having more family to dote on them?
Yes, they do, and it can be overwhelming to the step. It really sort of takes some of the fun out of it for the kid, or at least that is what I saw in my own stepson. He would get stuff from a whopping 3 sets of grandparents and two sets of parents, not to mention aunts and uncles. I tried to explain this to my parents, but they insisted on getting him stuff. I always insisted that when he was with us at my family's celebration, it was my and my husband's responsibility to provide something for him to unwrap. They never listened to me. It helped when he started spending Christmas with his mom, and then he grew up and it wasn't an issue any more.
I don't love the idea of forcing a relationship between steps and grandparents. My stepson is unlikely to have an ongoing relationship with my parents; in fact, he doesn't. And that's okay; he has perfectly lovely grandparents of his own. I know plenty of families do it differently, and that's fine, but it's not important to everyone.
What a weird reaction. There is nothing wrong with stepgrandparents giving their steps gifts. And was your stepson the only kid there? If not, did you expect the grandparents to give presents to the other kids and not the stepson? That’s terrible.