Anonymous wrote:I did E-A-S as the “schedule” and capped daytime naps in the beginning because the ped said to. But otherwise on demand (so I guess fed always after waking but also for any hunger cues during cluster feeding? It’s kind of a blur. Certainly I always fed the baby if she seemed hungry at all. And I started the nap process based on wake window length but that always came with sleepy cues too.
E-A-S and wake windows really helped me to just have a handle on the day but I wouldn’t call it a “schedule” and it was still responsive to the baby. It just helped me to have a sort of plan. It worked great except for the witching hour, but I guess that was also on our “schedule” and I would just plunk down on the couch with snacks and TV on mute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. He is 4 weeks old.
I have a 5 week old who has also gained 2 lbs by 4 weeks. I followed her lead the first few weeks but by 4 weeks we were feeding every 3 hours during the day and still are. I think it has helped her nap better and maybe sleep longer stretches night. My first was a slacker and getting him to a schedule later on was a nightmare, so I started earlier this time.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. He is 4 weeks old.
Anonymous wrote:Personal preference. If on demand is working for you, keep doing and tell people you’re not in the market for advice. Personally, I’m a schedule person for the reasons listed - my babies have been on schedules since they were 2 weeks old.
There’s no “should” here. What makes sense for you and how you want to parent?
Anonymous wrote:On demand. They are wll over the place. I would not let them sleep for linger than 3 hrs at a time during tbe day though. Has he regained his birth weight?
Anonymous wrote:Schedule. Everyone will be happier.
Been there, done that.
Anonymous wrote:It’s a little creepy how you say he’s a good baby. Ummm all newborns are good babies