Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Beach, Legacy and Kickers are all at the level of BRYC, VDA or McLean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Beach, Legacy and Kickers are all at the level of BRYC, VDA or McLean.
Yes, their top teams can be competitive against B teams of ECNL clubs. Not sure about BRYC, but VDA and McLean's top teams are head and shoulders above the top teams from ECNL-R clubs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Beach, Legacy and Kickers are all at the level of BRYC, VDA or McLean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Beach, Legacy and Kickers are all at the level of BRYC, VDA or McLean.
This is why they invented pro/rel. Incentive to get better or stay better. There will always be a team, outside of the usual power structure, who performs well against the established clubs. That is a good thing. Clubs get used to the same type players and coaches that get them wins, but things change. Always need to be open to what else is out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Beach, Legacy and Kickers are all at the level of BRYC, VDA or McLean.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Good luck with your search. Due to their geographic location, Beach will have hard time finding a competitive league. Their teams are not at the ECNL level so ECNL-R might be a better fit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Beach and Legacy both deserve ECNL slots. They are both strong clubs on both the boys and girls sides and through all age groups and there are no ECNL clubs near by.
Beach is a strong club. Legacy was a strong club, not anymore. Richmond United get kids from there doubt they would let them in. If Beach doesn’t get in within the next year or two they will start to look for something else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ECNL-R is trash to be fair. We are from the south, 757 area. Soccer in this area is so far behind, it's embarrassing. No ambition. Beach is content to dominate their small piece of VA.
I wouldn't say ECNL-R is trash, but there are only a handful of competitive clubs in it. It is not a well rounded league by any stretch. Beach competes in good tournaments. I see their teams in enough brackets. They play who they can for where they are located. Like a previous poster said, there isn't a bunch of ECNL teams near them, so not sure what else they could do.
It is all relative. I have two kids in ECNL and the ECNL groups normally only have a handful of competitive teams as well at a given age group. The bottom half of the ECNL groups are not very good (relatively) either which makes it not well rounded just like you can say for the ECNL-RL. The top of ECNL-R is not trash and can compete, even with the middle of the ECNL teams when given a chance. A few examples - this past weekend at CASL. Beach 06 boys lost to NCFC ECNL 2-1 and watching the match, Beach was the better team. Richmond Kickers 06 boys lost to NC Fusion ECNL 2-1 but outplayed them and then turned around and beat NCFC ECNL 1-0 the next day, again outplaying them. I was surprised to see how good those two boys teams were to watch. The top of ECNL-R is very competitive just like the top of ECNL is. after that, there is a significant drop off compared to their respective levels. Looking at the results further it looks like that same kickers 06 team also beat UFA RL 2-0 and that UFA RL team was at the SC ECNL Showcase last weekend and were very competitive vs ECNL teams when they played. This is a couple of examples but I have seen it elsewhere when top half ECNL-R teams play vs ECNL teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ECNL-R is trash to be fair. We are from the south, 757 area. Soccer in this area is so far behind, it's embarrassing. No ambition. Beach is content to dominate their small piece of VA.
I wouldn't say ECNL-R is trash, but there are only a handful of competitive clubs in it. It is not a well rounded league by any stretch. Beach competes in good tournaments. I see their teams in enough brackets. They play who they can for where they are located. Like a previous poster said, there isn't a bunch of ECNL teams near them, so not sure what else they could do.
It is all relative. I have two kids in ECNL and the ECNL groups normally only have a handful of competitive teams as well at a given age group. The bottom half of the ECNL groups are not very good (relatively) either which makes it not well rounded just like you can say for the ECNL-RL. The top of ECNL-R is not trash and can compete, even with the middle of the ECNL teams when given a chance. A few examples - this past weekend at CASL. Beach 06 boys lost to NCFC ECNL 2-1 and watching the match, Beach was the better team. Richmond Kickers 06 boys lost to NC Fusion ECNL 2-1 but outplayed them and then turned around and beat NCFC ECNL 1-0 the next day, again outplaying them. I was surprised to see how good those two boys teams were to watch. The top of ECNL-R is very competitive just like the top of ECNL is. after that, there is a significant drop off compared to their respective levels. Looking at the results further it looks like that same kickers 06 team also beat UFA RL 2-0 and that UFA RL team was at the SC ECNL Showcase last weekend and were very competitive vs ECNL teams when they played. This is a couple of examples but I have seen it elsewhere when top half ECNL-R teams play vs ECNL teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:ECNL-R is trash to be fair. We are from the south, 757 area. Soccer in this area is so far behind, it's embarrassing. No ambition. Beach is content to dominate their small piece of VA.
I wouldn't say ECNL-R is trash, but there are only a handful of competitive clubs in it. It is not a well rounded league by any stretch. Beach competes in good tournaments. I see their teams in enough brackets. They play who they can for where they are located. Like a previous poster said, there isn't a bunch of ECNL teams near them, so not sure what else they could do.