Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have an almost three year old and 18 month old. It's hard. Our rule is no one takes a toy from anyone, if you want what the other is playing with you have to ask and offer an alternative toy to trade.
I separate them as much as possible. I set the older one up with an activity and let the younger one play with the "good" toys.
Also make sure they are napping/doing quiet time at the same time. The two hour break in the middle of the day is the only thing that saves my sanity.
But when do you let your older one play with the "good" toys? Wouldn't they notice if their little sibling was always playing with toys and they were always doing crafts?
Anonymous wrote:I have an almost three year old and 18 month old. It's hard. Our rule is no one takes a toy from anyone, if you want what the other is playing with you have to ask and offer an alternative toy to trade.
I separate them as much as possible. I set the older one up with an activity and let the younger one play with the "good" toys.
Also make sure they are napping/doing quiet time at the same time. The two hour break in the middle of the day is the only thing that saves my sanity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids behave better when they think I am not there. The refereeing is about having you pick which kid you love more (in their heads), so if you aren’t there, there is nothing to be jealous about.
Would it be unfair to just tell them you’ll take the toy so neither gets it?
That’s not fair to the little one. If he/she is playing with a toy and the older one pulls it away from her, how is it fair that you then take it away?
Give the "wronged" kid an M&M in front of the naughty kid.
There is a book called 150 screen free activities for kids that should have ideas what would appeal to both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids behave better when they think I am not there. The refereeing is about having you pick which kid you love more (in their heads), so if you aren’t there, there is nothing to be jealous about.
Would it be unfair to just tell them you’ll take the toy so neither gets it?
That’s not fair to the little one. If he/she is playing with a toy and the older one pulls it away from her, how is it fair that you then take it away?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just want to say we're in the same boat with v similar ages. Feels much harder than a few months ago when baby wasn't mobile and was sleeping more.
+1.
+2
+3. The one year old is a person now with wants, likes, needs and demands. And also mobile! Old enough to play but not old enough to understand that the Brio tracks the older kid just laid down need to stay on the floor. For us, 3/1 were the hardest ages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just want to say we're in the same boat with v similar ages. Feels much harder than a few months ago when baby wasn't mobile and was sleeping more.
+1.
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just want to say we're in the same boat with v similar ages. Feels much harder than a few months ago when baby wasn't mobile and was sleeping more.
+1.
Anonymous wrote:Just want to say we're in the same boat with v similar ages. Feels much harder than a few months ago when baby wasn't mobile and was sleeping more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids behave better when they think I am not there. The refereeing is about having you pick which kid you love more (in their heads), so if you aren’t there, there is nothing to be jealous about.
Would it be unfair to just tell them you’ll take the toy so neither gets it?