Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Question: what is the salary for 75%? I’m not big law and I know they work lots of hours, but are 50 hour weeks a 75% commitment and does the salary link up?
Can you do that a couple of years then move to government? I think you’d be happier with a straight 40 given other responsibilities.
OP here. Depends on the firm and your level. In my case it would be $165,000. Yes- I would actually like to eventually move to government but those jobs in my practice area are hard to come by and I’ve got an in here with a firm after some time out. Also with bonus, I’ll probably make a lot more at a firm whereas in give me to I’m not sure how much I’d still bring home after paying aftercare, summer care, housekeeping, commuting cost, etc. It would be great to have several years of high pay to replace out old cars, do some much needed repairs and updates to our house, and boost college savings. I actually really like the firm and people too, just feeling worries about making the schedule work
Anonymous wrote:I think it really depends on the firm and whether you'd be coming in as counsel or an associate. Counsel, you could make it work. Associate, I think you may be billing way more than 1400 (a senior associate I know well is in a regulatory group and will hit 2800 this year but her 'target' is under 2000 - there is just SO much work and not enough people to do it). I'd think the firm is unbelievably slammed if they're willing to offer this to you, and may just be looking to get bodies in the door. I would very much doubt that you can consistently plan your schedule around 9-5 as an associate; this friend has a young child and is able to typically take half an hour between 6-7:30 to say goodnight to her kiddo but then works about 3-4 hours afterwards.
I'd also be sure to get WFH requirements in writing as part of your offer as I get the sense that firms are saying whatever it takes to get people to sign on.
Good luck though! I'm hoping I'm being overly cynical. Otherwise, maybe look at going in-house? I moved from biglaw to in-house and the flexibility is significantly better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, though I probably only work 50% and not 75%
OP here. Can you explain more? You do 50% of your firm’s billable requirements? Is that a formal arrangement, and are you still on the associate pay scale? I assume you work less than 40 hours per week at 50%? About how many hours do you put in total (not just billable)?
I work in a niche area. I worked at one firm as a real flex time associate and later switched firms on a real part time schedule arrangement. I am probably going to bill a little over 1000 hours this year. I get paid hourly and have no billable requirement. I am my own person with my own arrangement now and not on the associate pay scale. I also got paid hourly at the prior firm - though was on the associate pay scale then. Overall I think hourly pay is a fine approach for me because at least I get paid more if I work more. I basically only do billable work.
Ah interesting. Thanks for explaining. Do you mind sharing about what you earn by the hour? Do you have to push to get work, or do you always have a good stream of work?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, though I probably only work 50% and not 75%
OP here. Can you explain more? You do 50% of your firm’s billable requirements? Is that a formal arrangement, and are you still on the associate pay scale? I assume you work less than 40 hours per week at 50%? About how many hours do you put in total (not just billable)?
I work in a niche area. I worked at one firm as a real flex time associate and later switched firms on a real part time schedule arrangement. I am probably going to bill a little over 1000 hours this year. I get paid hourly and have no billable requirement. I am my own person with my own arrangement now and not on the associate pay scale. I also got paid hourly at the prior firm - though was on the associate pay scale then. Overall I think hourly pay is a fine approach for me because at least I get paid more if I work more. I basically only do billable work.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a retired Biglaw partner, and my impression is that a 75 percent schedule for a regulatory lawyer would be no more than a 9 to 5 job. If your husband is home by 4 or 5 everyday, you are no different than any other couple where both are working.
Anonymous wrote:To me, you have to get the answer on the WFH options. If you are expected to come in 4-5 days a week I think that just sounds miserable. If it's 2-3 days it seems workable, especially if you are doing it for a year or 2 before going to government.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, though I probably only work 50% and not 75%
OP here. Can you explain more? You do 50% of your firm’s billable requirements? Is that a formal arrangement, and are you still on the associate pay scale? I assume you work less than 40 hours per week at 50%? About how many hours do you put in total (not just billable)?
Anonymous wrote:What is your spouse willing to add to their plate to support you? If husband is in government, he should have sick/annual leave available to cover kid appointments and days off - will he take on those days/duties on to support your transition? Will he help manage the household help?
Your plan is doable, but only if your husband is actually willing to do substantially more household management - especially in the first 1-2 years as you re-build your skills and your reputation at the new firm.