Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Clearly if you feel so strongly you must have a sensible, viable, practical solution in mind. So let's hear it.
To convince your uber progressive nonsensical privileged point of view? No thanks, not interested in fantasyland talk. Let me guess, you have a bunch of BLM and Hate has no Home Here signs in your yard, yet you haven't done anything concrete and tangible to make a difference. It's unconscionable that you would lend any support to allowing hourly low wage workers to be subjected to this kind of violence, work environment and trauma. It speaks volumes for how out of touch you are. Maybe you should reconsider.
So in other words, you have absolutely nothing other than dumb republican culture war talking points? Completely unsurprising. Come back when you have something to contribute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Clearly if you feel so strongly you must have a sensible, viable, practical solution in mind. So let's hear it.
To convince your uber progressive nonsensical privileged point of view? No thanks, not interested in fantasyland talk. Let me guess, you have a bunch of BLM and Hate has no Home Here signs in your yard, yet you haven't done anything concrete and tangible to make a difference. It's unconscionable that you would lend any support to allowing hourly low wage workers to be subjected to this kind of violence, work environment and trauma. It speaks volumes for how out of touch you are. Maybe you should reconsider.
So in other words, you have absolutely nothing other than dumb republican culture war talking points? Completely unsurprising. Come back when you have something to contribute.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Clearly if you feel so strongly you must have a sensible, viable, practical solution in mind. So let's hear it.
To convince your uber progressive nonsensical privileged point of view? No thanks, not interested in fantasyland talk. Let me guess, you have a bunch of BLM and Hate has no Home Here signs in your yard, yet you haven't done anything concrete and tangible to make a difference. It's unconscionable that you would lend any support to allowing hourly low wage workers to be subjected to this kind of violence, work environment and trauma. It speaks volumes for how out of touch you are. Maybe you should reconsider.
Anonymous wrote:No need to publicize these property crimes. These retailers have insurance to cover any loss or damage. Don’t give trumpians any ammo to use against BIPOC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Clearly if you feel so strongly you must have a sensible, viable, practical solution in mind. So let's hear it.
To convince your uber progressive nonsensical privileged point of view? No thanks, not interested in fantasyland talk. Let me guess, you have a bunch of BLM and Hate has no Home Here signs in your yard, yet you haven't done anything concrete and tangible to make a difference. It's unconscionable that you would lend any support to allowing hourly low wage workers to be subjected to this kind of violence, work environment and trauma. It speaks volumes for how out of touch you are. Maybe you should reconsider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Clearly if you feel so strongly you must have a sensible, viable, practical solution in mind. So let's hear it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
SMH with this nonsense. I hope none of you, your family nor your friends work in any store that gets robbed during one of these. It is not a victimless crime. And the answer isn't to throw up our hands and say "well, insurance will cover it NBD." Your answer reeks of privilege and lack of real world understanding. These employees risk getting hurt and are exposed to violence and trauma. But as long as insurance covers it (until insurance decides to drop you), I guess that's ok for corporate America, just not the everyday hourly worker. Got it.
Anonymous wrote:For anyone replying with "something must be done!"
What exactly do you think can be done when a group of 20+ people show up, grab stuff, and are gone in minutes? There's literally nothing one or even two security guards can do against a group that size, and it would be logistically impossible to mount a police response on the scale required to arrest that many people at once in the mere minutes it takes them to disperse.
Short of having a 100 man SWAT team on standby 24/7, what exactly do you want the police to do? Insurance covers the cost, and police round up as many as they can after the fact using security footage. That's about the best we can hope for.
The plain fact is that social media has provided a tool for these criminals to organize on a far more effective level than police could possibly have the resources to prevent, no matter how much additional funding you could realistically give them.
If you actually want to stop this stuff from happening, the real solution is not to increase funding to the police, it's to raise wages, increase access to healthcare, force all employers to offer generous vacation time, and increase funding to public transit so that parents can spend time raising their kids and not spend 18 hours a day commuting to two jobs they can never take any time off from.
Anonymous wrote:No need to publicize these property crimes. These retailers have insurance to cover any loss or damage. Don’t give trumpians any ammo to use against BIPOC.
Anonymous wrote:No need to publicize these property crimes. These retailers have insurance to cover any loss or damage. Don’t give trumpians any ammo to use against BIPOC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No need to publicize these property crimes. These retailers have insurance to cover any loss or damage. Don’t give trumpians any ammo to use against BIPOC.
WTF. This is the reason the country is going to hell in a handbasket.
If a group of black or white or purple people commit a series of crimes, I wish everyone would call it as it is.