Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
It’s not objective. You can game the test, pay for test tutoring and increase scores. The only proven correlation between SATs and ACTs is income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this will hurt kids who are late bloomers.
good
Anonymous wrote:How will they distinguish among white or Asian kids who all have the same grades?
I get how this allows them to pick minorities. But there will be spots who go to white/Asian kids. And a very large percentage of these kids will have almost identical grades--I know my kid and all of his friends have the same grades
Retake and lax grading makes it almost impossible to not do well in many publics (DCPS for sure).
I get that extracurriculars are one thing--but again, most kids will have a very, very similar version of these as well. And it's not Harvard--we're not looking for kids to split to atom to get into UCSD or even UCLA.
Anonymous wrote:This will just force all the schools that have held out on grade inflation to jump on the grade inflation bandwagon. They have to to survive now. No more pointing to the SAT scores to balance the equation.
Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
Anonymous wrote:I could see this making a student's choice of major even more important. Instead of schools, employers might seek out certain rigorous majors. DC is a senior interviewing now for jobs and some high paying jobs are asking for math beyond calculus, and some are requiring skills tests to get an interview.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's fantastic. Study after study after study has confirmed the high correlation between family income and parental education and SAT and ACT scores. Generally speaking, high scores were born on third base. It doesn't make them any smarter.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's fantastic. Study after study after study has confirmed the high correlation between family income and parental education and SAT and ACT scores. Generally speaking, high scores were born on third base. It doesn't make them any smarter.
Anonymous wrote:
The fewer objective measurements, the more opaque cherry-picking they can do.
And in the near future, you'll wonder why they have way fewer Asian students graduates...
Anonymous wrote:Test optional just means Asians and whites must submit. Blacks and crypto-Latins don’t.
I mean at this point I would rather just have transparent quotas. That system was less insulting.
Anonymous wrote:this will hurt kids who are late bloomers.