Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the typical income/net worth for this demographic? Is anyone making under 7 figures or having a net worth below 10 million?
There may be, but not us. The carrying costs are significant in terms of interest, taxes, maintenance, upkeep, and utilities. Even if there is no mortgage, the opportunity cost of having $3M of equity just sitting there is very high.
I would say factoring all of the above, a $3M home may have about a 150-200k annual effective cost. Unless you are making 7 figures, that kind of housing cost is just excessive.
hmmm... what if that $3M equity becomes $5M or $6M in 7-8 years?
And your estimate on the effective cost is way off. A $3M house here is new or newer, so there is minimal maintenance and utilities are also low due to the new building standards.
I'm not sure if a $3M home would become $5M or $6M in such a short period of time. It can happen on a one-off basis, I guess, but traditionally, the appreciation of homes in this price range does not work like this. Your typical $3M home already is in a very nice neighborhood, is of a certain size, and built to a certain quality standard. Generally speaking, unless significant renovation or improvement is done to a home, the value would not increase significantly. I mean you can take a look at the current 5-6 million dollar homes in the area and see what their prices were 7-8 years ago. There is a $4M home on the market down the road and it was sold 7 years ago for $3.5M. Another one nearby is selling for $5.5M, and it sold 10 years ago for, $5M. These are anecdotal, of course but they match what I've seen in general browsing for homes in the area.
My estimate on effective cost is factoring in either mortgage interest or opportunity cost on about 2M. I place this cost at about 5% a year, or about $100k. Taxes will be over 30k, and another 20k for everything else is rather conservative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the typical income/net worth for this demographic? Is anyone making under 7 figures or having a net worth below 10 million?
There may be, but not us. The carrying costs are significant in terms of interest, taxes, maintenance, upkeep, and utilities. Even if there is no mortgage, the opportunity cost of having $3M of equity just sitting there is very high.
I would say factoring all of the above, a $3M home may have about a 150-200k annual effective cost. Unless you are making 7 figures, that kind of housing cost is just excessive.
hmmm... what if that $3M equity becomes $5M or $6M in 7-8 years?
And your estimate on the effective cost is way off. A $3M house here is new or newer, so there is minimal maintenance and utilities are also low due to the new building standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the typical income/net worth for this demographic? Is anyone making under 7 figures or having a net worth below 10 million?
There may be, but not us. The carrying costs are significant in terms of interest, taxes, maintenance, upkeep, and utilities. Even if there is no mortgage, the opportunity cost of having $3M of equity just sitting there is very high.
I would say factoring all of the above, a $3M home may have about a 150-200k annual effective cost. Unless you are making 7 figures, that kind of housing cost is just excessive.
Anonymous wrote:What's the typical income/net worth for this demographic? Is anyone making under 7 figures or having a net worth below 10 million?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in a 3.5M house (cost at 2M). HHI 500K. NW 6M.
I don't consider myself rich, just comfortable.
OP said people who buy 3M homes, not people who buy 2M homes and enjoy appreciation.
I was trying to demonstrate that you don't have to make 7 figures to buy a 3M house. Even if I wasn't living in a 3M house, I could still feel comfortable buying it now.
You would feel comfortable buying a $3m house on $500k HHI? You're an idiot.
yes, I'll be comfortable with buying a $3M house on $500k HHI AND $6M NW. I don't think I'm an idiot. The house is also an investment if you select the right area.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in a 3.5M house (cost at 2M). HHI 500K. NW 6M.
I don't consider myself rich, just comfortable.
OP said people who buy 3M homes, not people who buy 2M homes and enjoy appreciation.
I was trying to demonstrate that you don't have to make 7 figures to buy a 3M house. Even if I wasn't living in a 3M house, I could still feel comfortable buying it now.
You would feel comfortable buying a $3m house on $500k HHI? You're an idiot.
Anonymous wrote:We have hhi of 1.2m, net worth of around 4.5 and are staying in our 900k house.
.Anonymous wrote:It's also people that made a lot in equity in their previous homes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in a 3.5M house (cost at 2M). HHI 500K. NW 6M.
I don't consider myself rich, just comfortable.
OP said people who buy 3M homes, not people who buy 2M homes and enjoy appreciation.
I was trying to demonstrate that you don't have to make 7 figures to buy a 3M house. Even if I wasn't living in a 3M house, I could still feel comfortable buying it now.
You would feel comfortable buying a $3m house on $500k HHI? You're an idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Living in a 3.5M house (cost at 2M). HHI 500K. NW 6M.
I don't consider myself rich, just comfortable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Living in a 3.5M house (cost at 2M). HHI 500K. NW 6M.
I don't consider myself rich, just comfortable.
OP said people who buy 3M homes, not people who buy 2M homes and enjoy appreciation.
I was trying to demonstrate that you don't have to make 7 figures to buy a 3M house. Even if I wasn't living in a 3M house, I could still feel comfortable buying it now.