Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this is what my spouse shared with me, but please get the full story before you comment. I do know one of these books available to 13 year olds shows an explicit drawing of someone giving a blow job. I’m no prude and I think we should exercise extreme caution censoring books, but I don’t want my kid reading that. And no, my kid also doesn’t have unfettered access to the internet.

+1 I don’t support censorship of anything but restricting age inappropriate books is not only acceptable but sensible. But some of the radical fringe insist 9 years should be exposed to graphic imagery.

+2
Parents interested in exposing their children to the abuse and rape of women, as well as other graphic depictions of sex, are welcome to check those books out in a public library to share with their kids. They do not have any place in a public school. Period.

Anonymous wrote:It's not only Florida.

And it's coming to all red states

VA just added itself to the list of the dumbing down of its schools. Youngkin will do this asap.

The religious right is taking hold and god help us all particularly women.

Yes, I'm sure you're such a champion of women, right? Did you even bother to watch the video that was posted? What did you think of the text concerning punching and kicking a woman, then locking her in a closet, only to kick her some more? Tell us. We'll wait.

Anonymous wrote:Every child should read this. Why not?

UNREAL. Good for these parents and that lawyer at the end. And now, we'll sit back and listen to DCUM liberals defend those books and why they should be in our public school libraries.

Anonymous wrote:Oh America! I mean it is Florida, but still.
https://www.rawstory.com/banned-books-in-florida/

member of the Flagler County, Florida school board has filed a criminal complaint over four copies of an LGBTQ book recommended for 14 to 18 year olds, claiming it violates the state's obscenity laws.

"My concern is for the children of Flagler County," Jill Woolbright claims, according to the Palm Coast Observer. "This book needs to be investigated as a crime in our media center. This is pretty heavy stuff, violating our own policies.

What is with you people and your far-left, unreliable sources?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/raw-story/

LEFT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Overall, we rate Raw Story Left Biased based on story selection that favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting due to half-true, false, and unproven claims, as well as the promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP:

Please explain the difference between banning and canceling.

I’ll wait.

“Cancelling” is but one of the many RWNJ talking points of the last few years, so what you’re talking about is two sides of the same fascist coin.

Cancelling isn’t a “talking point” as you dismissively called it. It is censorship. But you knew that.

And the left has pushed it to frightening levels:

https://humanevents.com/2021/09/28/nearly-25-of-college-students-say-its-acceptable-to-use-violence-to-shut-down-controversial-speakers/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP:

Please explain the difference between banning and canceling.

I’ll wait.

“Cancelling” is but one of the many RWNJ talking points of the last few years, so what you’re talking about is two sides of the same fascist coin.

?

Liberals get off on canceling individual people. Republicans prefer to manipulate and control the masses.

Anonymous wrote:OP:

Please explain the difference between banning and canceling.

I’ll wait.

“Cancelling” is but one of the many RWNJ talking points of the last few years, so what you’re talking about is two sides of the same fascist coin.

OP:

Please explain the difference between banning and canceling.

I’ll wait.

Don’t ban books.

Just cancel them. It sounds better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/education/581134-movement-to-ban-or-even-burn-school-library-books-gains?amp

This recent article from The Hill is balanced: leads with recent conservative efforts but quickly reminds us that liberals led efforts to ban Huck Finn, Of Mice and Men, and To Kill a Mockingbird ffs.

It’s all worrisome regardless of who is leading the fight.

Wait, so some crazy liberals opposed Twain — did any school district actual enact a ban. Don’t align the actions of loons with leaders.

Wait, so some crazy Florida people opposed a lesbian book - did any school district around here enact a ban? I agree, “don’t align the actions of loons with leaders.”

Anonymous wrote:Huckleberry Finn, Of Mice and Men, and To Kill a Mockingbird are racist works by cis-gender dead white males.

Why not ban them?

Widely known that Twain was gay. Google it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not only Florida.

And it's coming to all red states

VA just added itself to the list of the dumbing down of its schools. Youngkin will do this asap.

The religious right is taking hold and god help us all particularly women.

Punching women- books describing punching women in the face, locking them in the closet: those need to be in the school library, right PP? Those are the books?

It oppresses women if we don’t give our kids access to graphic descriptions of violence against women: that is what you are saying, isn’t it PP?

You are an idiot.

These books everyone should read.

Who are you to tell anyone else what books kids should read for their education? You don't want your kid to read them private school.

And who gets to decide those books the religious right? NO

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Huckleberry Finn, Of Mice and Men, and To Kill a Mockingbird are racist works by cis-gender dead white males.

Why not ban them?

Ah, the ignorance.

Harper Lee was a lady writer. No clue what her preferred pronouns were. Doesn’t really matter anyway, right?

Probably believes it was written by Truman.

Anonymous wrote:Banning a book encourages people to read it.

That’s the Skippy John Jones effect.

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/changing-america/enrichment/education/581134-movement-to-ban-or-even-burn-school-library-books-gains?amp

This recent article from The Hill is balanced: leads with recent conservative efforts but quickly reminds us that liberals led efforts to ban Huck Finn, Of Mice and Men, and To Kill a Mockingbird ffs.

It’s all worrisome regardless of who is leading the fight.

Wait, so some crazy liberals opposed Twain — did any school district actual enact a ban. Don’t align the actions of loons with leaders.