Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes if I really think about it. The adult onlies I know tend to be more comfortable doing things on their own and less emotionally needy. Even if they have mental health issues or other problems (everyone has problems), they do not seem to need as much validation as my other friends or have as much need for an audience. I do also think onlies are less willing to compromise with others. That can be very annoying but I also admire it at times— the ones in my life tend to get what they want (and exactly what they want) a lot more often than I do, and I try to take notes because I’m often a doormat.
I am a middle child and very different than this. I have a deep fear of being disliked and overlooked, and I tend to overcompensate by talking a lot and being very accommodating of others.
I personally have found that youngest children (especially “the babies” — people younger than their siblings by more than a year or two, especially in large families) are the biggest challenge personality wise. The neediness of a middle child combined with the entitlement/demanding attitude of an only.
The eldest really varies IME.
Interesting. The friends that come to mind when you say least willing to compromise and get what they want - all are middle children.
That is so surprising to me. I mean, birth order stuff is variable and as others have noted, a lot of other factors can interfere. But one thing that is very persistent is that middle kids generally get less focus and attention during childhood. Obviously depends on the person, but that often leads to people who are used to compromising and accommodating as adults.
Of course, when people have not had their emotional needs met throughout their childhoods, they might overcorrect in adulthood in order to make up for lost time. Ideally it evens out eventually, but I can see how someone who has been forced to compromise their whole life could become very rigid at some point.
All of this is one of several reasons I only had one kid.
In my opinion, that's what happens. Or if not overcompensating, they are definitely big "joiners" who want to be accepted and in a toxic manifestation, basically adored. The emotional vampires I know are almost always middle kids. I don't actually think they're accommodating and compromising, though they may feel that way about themselves.
If this is something you feel you run into a lot, you might want to look at your own emotional needs and behaviors— this level of resentment indicates that’s what’s going on isn’t just about them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes if I really think about it. The adult onlies I know tend to be more comfortable doing things on their own and less emotionally needy. Even if they have mental health issues or other problems (everyone has problems), they do not seem to need as much validation as my other friends or have as much need for an audience. I do also think onlies are less willing to compromise with others. That can be very annoying but I also admire it at times— the ones in my life tend to get what they want (and exactly what they want) a lot more often than I do, and I try to take notes because I’m often a doormat.
I am a middle child and very different than this. I have a deep fear of being disliked and overlooked, and I tend to overcompensate by talking a lot and being very accommodating of others.
I personally have found that youngest children (especially “the babies” — people younger than their siblings by more than a year or two, especially in large families) are the biggest challenge personality wise. The neediness of a middle child combined with the entitlement/demanding attitude of an only.
The eldest really varies IME.
Interesting. The friends that come to mind when you say least willing to compromise and get what they want - all are middle children.
That is so surprising to me. I mean, birth order stuff is variable and as others have noted, a lot of other factors can interfere. But one thing that is very persistent is that middle kids generally get less focus and attention during childhood. Obviously depends on the person, but that often leads to people who are used to compromising and accommodating as adults.
Of course, when people have not had their emotional needs met throughout their childhoods, they might overcorrect in adulthood in order to make up for lost time. Ideally it evens out eventually, but I can see how someone who has been forced to compromise their whole life could become very rigid at some point.
All of this is one of several reasons I only had one kid.
In my opinion, that's what happens. Or if not overcompensating, they are definitely big "joiners" who want to be accepted and in a toxic manifestation, basically adored. The emotional vampires I know are almost always middle kids. I don't actually think they're accommodating and compromising, though they may feel that way about themselves.
If this is something you feel you run into a lot, you might want to look at your own emotional needs and behaviors— this level of resentment indicates that’s what’s going on isn’t just about them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes if I really think about it. The adult onlies I know tend to be more comfortable doing things on their own and less emotionally needy. Even if they have mental health issues or other problems (everyone has problems), they do not seem to need as much validation as my other friends or have as much need for an audience. I do also think onlies are less willing to compromise with others. That can be very annoying but I also admire it at times— the ones in my life tend to get what they want (and exactly what they want) a lot more often than I do, and I try to take notes because I’m often a doormat.
I am a middle child and very different than this. I have a deep fear of being disliked and overlooked, and I tend to overcompensate by talking a lot and being very accommodating of others.
I personally have found that youngest children (especially “the babies” — people younger than their siblings by more than a year or two, especially in large families) are the biggest challenge personality wise. The neediness of a middle child combined with the entitlement/demanding attitude of an only.
The eldest really varies IME.
Interesting. The friends that come to mind when you say least willing to compromise and get what they want - all are middle children.
That is so surprising to me. I mean, birth order stuff is variable and as others have noted, a lot of other factors can interfere. But one thing that is very persistent is that middle kids generally get less focus and attention during childhood. Obviously depends on the person, but that often leads to people who are used to compromising and accommodating as adults.
Of course, when people have not had their emotional needs met throughout their childhoods, they might overcorrect in adulthood in order to make up for lost time. Ideally it evens out eventually, but I can see how someone who has been forced to compromise their whole life could become very rigid at some point.
All of this is one of several reasons I only had one kid.
In my opinion, that's what happens. Or if not overcompensating, they are definitely big "joiners" who want to be accepted and in a toxic manifestation, basically adored. The emotional vampires I know are almost always middle kids. I don't actually think they're accommodating and compromising, though they may feel that way about themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes if I really think about it. The adult onlies I know tend to be more comfortable doing things on their own and less emotionally needy. Even if they have mental health issues or other problems (everyone has problems), they do not seem to need as much validation as my other friends or have as much need for an audience. I do also think onlies are less willing to compromise with others. That can be very annoying but I also admire it at times— the ones in my life tend to get what they want (and exactly what they want) a lot more often than I do, and I try to take notes because I’m often a doormat.
I am a middle child and very different than this. I have a deep fear of being disliked and overlooked, and I tend to overcompensate by talking a lot and being very accommodating of others.
I personally have found that youngest children (especially “the babies” — people younger than their siblings by more than a year or two, especially in large families) are the biggest challenge personality wise. The neediness of a middle child combined with the entitlement/demanding attitude of an only.
The eldest really varies IME.
Interesting. The friends that come to mind when you say least willing to compromise and get what they want - all are middle children.
That is so surprising to me. I mean, birth order stuff is variable and as others have noted, a lot of other factors can interfere. But one thing that is very persistent is that middle kids generally get less focus and attention during childhood. Obviously depends on the person, but that often leads to people who are used to compromising and accommodating as adults.
Of course, when people have not had their emotional needs met throughout their childhoods, they might overcorrect in adulthood in order to make up for lost time. Ideally it evens out eventually, but I can see how someone who has been forced to compromise their whole life could become very rigid at some point.
All of this is one of several reasons I only had one kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes if I really think about it. The adult onlies I know tend to be more comfortable doing things on their own and less emotionally needy. Even if they have mental health issues or other problems (everyone has problems), they do not seem to need as much validation as my other friends or have as much need for an audience. I do also think onlies are less willing to compromise with others. That can be very annoying but I also admire it at times— the ones in my life tend to get what they want (and exactly what they want) a lot more often than I do, and I try to take notes because I’m often a doormat.
I am a middle child and very different than this. I have a deep fear of being disliked and overlooked, and I tend to overcompensate by talking a lot and being very accommodating of others.
I personally have found that youngest children (especially “the babies” — people younger than their siblings by more than a year or two, especially in large families) are the biggest challenge personality wise. The neediness of a middle child combined with the entitlement/demanding attitude of an only.
The eldest really varies IME.
Interesting. The friends that come to mind when you say least willing to compromise and get what they want - all are middle children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
S/O of the only children thread. I feel like all the adult only children I know are recognizable as only children for a variety of reasons. Often obvious in childhood too. Thoughts from other people?
Yes one of my best friends is. In our 50s call her Princess /)
To her face or behind her back?

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
S/O of the only children thread. I feel like all the adult only children I know are recognizable as only children for a variety of reasons. Often obvious in childhood too. Thoughts from other people?
Yes one of my best friends is. In our 50s call her Princess /)
Anonymous wrote:No. Eldest and onlies are very similar. Most of the people I know who really can't handle accommodating others are youngest siblings.
Anonymous wrote:No. Stupid question.
I have two siblings, ten and eight years older than me. I read that makes me a psychology only child.