Anonymous wrote:This thread would be useful if it asked if one prefers public vs. private, assuming no cost difference. But, by noting specific schools, OP really wants to start another useless rankings/prestige thread.
Anonymous wrote:This thread would be useful if it asked if one prefers public vs. private, assuming no cost difference. But, by noting specific schools, OP really wants to start another useless rankings/prestige thread.
Anonymous wrote:I would do private for smaller schools. Afraid my kid will get lost in a big statue school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For many, the costs aren’t equal, and that matters. For VA residents, I would send my kid to UVA and save the money. If I lived in a state with mediocre state schools and had money to throw away, yes private would be nice.
OMFG UVA boosters are relentless. You clearly did not understand the assignment. "If all costs were equal" is right in the title.
Your question has a false premise. What is the point of directly comparing better publics with privates if you don’t take into account cost? Of course, if you’re OOS, then it’s a more fair comparison.
You seem to fail terribly at basic language comprehension. Is this a feature or a bug of a UVA education?
I understand the question, but you are an idiot. And, I’m not a UVA graduate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For many, the costs aren’t equal, and that matters. For VA residents, I would send my kid to UVA and save the money. If I lived in a state with mediocre state schools and had money to throw away, yes private would be nice.
OMFG UVA boosters are relentless. You clearly did not understand the assignment. "If all costs were equal" is right in the title.
Your question has a false premise. What is the point of directly comparing better publics with privates if you don’t take into account cost? Of course, if you’re OOS, then it’s a more fair comparison.
You seem to fail terribly at basic language comprehension. Is this a feature or a bug of a UVA education?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For many, the costs aren’t equal, and that matters. For VA residents, I would send my kid to UVA and save the money. If I lived in a state with mediocre state schools and had money to throw away, yes private would be nice.
OMFG UVA boosters are relentless. You clearly did not understand the assignment. "If all costs were equal" is right in the title.
Your question has a false premise. What is the point of directly comparing better publics with privates if you don’t take into account cost? Of course, if you’re OOS, then it’s a more fair comparison.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For many, the costs aren’t equal, and that matters. For VA residents, I would send my kid to UVA and save the money. If I lived in a state with mediocre state schools and had money to throw away, yes private would be nice.
OMFG UVA boosters are relentless. You clearly did not understand the assignment. "If all costs were equal" is right in the title.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Private. Same with high school
This
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would choose UVA McIntire over Penn Wharton for the price difference.
Yeah, but it’s not direct admission to McIntire unlike Wharton.
No way, never even heard of McIntire. What's that?
Anonymous wrote:Private. Same with high school