Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
To me there is nothing remotely attractive about going to Hopkins.
I'd do Delaware and then go to a better grad school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the draw is for soccer players to play D1 when the school itself may not be all that challenging for them. I could see doing that for football, because that sport has more potential money if you have the skills.
What’s the allure with accepting a recruited spot at a tiny school in a rural area just to play D1?
Depending upon the kid's situation, most likely to help offset the cost of college. Maybe the kid is good enough to play D1 and maybe at a top school, but the top school isn't providing a full ride or enough of a subsidy. And on the flip side maybe the smaller school is offering a full ride. Or maybe the kid just barely is able to play D1, then this is their best shot at having college subsidized. It all depends on the kid's situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ironic thing is that youth soccer is so costly now that lots of well off kids are playing that probably can go wherever they want in terms of cost. In those cases, I have no clue why they choose to go to less competitive schools.
A top recruit can get a 50 and below athletic scholarship at a very competitive program or a full ride at a less competitive program.
If money matters, the less competent program is the much better deal.
Student debt is the number one debt in this country. The average cost for a degree is around 100,000 and above.
The poster was talking about the kids where money does not matter. Youth sports are full of affluent kids. Soccer has tons of wealthy players and it is not even the worst offender in term of sucking the max dollars possible out of families.
Why do these well off families send students to these low level academic schools just to play soccer?
Your reading comprehension needs improving.
1. You’re not well off because you can afford travel soccer.
But more importantly, who said parents were sending their kid to low level schools to play soccer?
There are many well off families involved with deluxe youth soccer. Just pull in the parking lot of 90 percent of the games in our conference and try not to park next to some expensive late model hulking imported SUV. Good luck.
My favorite is my 9 year old gawking at butterfly doors on the tesla at our practice, or looking at the private black car SUV with driver waiting to pick up a kid from practice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ironic thing is that youth soccer is so costly now that lots of well off kids are playing that probably can go wherever they want in terms of cost. In those cases, I have no clue why they choose to go to less competitive schools.
A top recruit can get a 50 and below athletic scholarship at a very competitive program or a full ride at a less competitive program.
If money matters, the less competent program is the much better deal.
Student debt is the number one debt in this country. The average cost for a degree is around 100,000 and above.
The poster was talking about the kids where money does not matter. Youth sports are full of affluent kids. Soccer has tons of wealthy players and it is not even the worst offender in term of sucking the max dollars possible out of families.
Why do these well off families send students to these low level academic schools just to play soccer?
Your reading comprehension needs improving.
1. You’re not well off because you can afford travel soccer.
But more importantly, who said parents were sending their kid to low level schools to play soccer?
There are many well off families involved with deluxe youth soccer. Just pull in the parking lot of 90 percent of the games in our conference and try not to park next to some expensive late model hulking imported SUV. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the draw is for soccer players to play D1 when the school itself may not be all that challenging for them. I could see doing that for football, because that sport has more potential money if you have the skills.
What’s the allure with accepting a recruited spot at a tiny school in a rural area just to play D1?
Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the draw is for soccer players to play D1 when the school itself may not be all that challenging for them. I could see doing that for football, because that sport has more potential money if you have the skills.
What’s the allure with accepting a recruited spot at a tiny school in a rural area just to play D1?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
To me there is nothing remotely attractive about going to Hopkins.
I'd do Delaware and then go to a better grad school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
To me there is nothing remotely attractive about going to Hopkins.
I'd do Delaware and then go to a better grad school.
P.S. if you said Amherst or Tufts my answer would have been different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
To me the answer is obviously hopkins but I discovered this is the completely outlier view. We had 5 players on our ecnl team looking to go high academic D3 and from what I have discovered, that is unusually high. The coach did not even seem to understand or support it. I was quite surprised to discover this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The ironic thing is that youth soccer is so costly now that lots of well off kids are playing that probably can go wherever they want in terms of cost. In those cases, I have no clue why they choose to go to less competitive schools.
A top recruit can get a 50 and below athletic scholarship at a very competitive program or a full ride at a less competitive program.
If money matters, the less competent program is the much better deal.
Student debt is the number one debt in this country. The average cost for a degree is around 100,000 and above.
The poster was talking about the kids where money does not matter. Youth sports are full of affluent kids. Soccer has tons of wealthy players and it is not even the worst offender in term of sucking the max dollars possible out of families.
Why do these well off families send students to these low level academic schools just to play soccer?
Your reading comprehension needs improving.
1. You’re not well off because you can afford travel soccer.
But more importantly, who said parents were sending their kid to low level schools to play soccer?
There are many well off families involved with deluxe youth soccer. Just pull in the parking lot of 90 percent of the games in our conference and try not to park next to some expensive late model hulking imported SUV. Good luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
To me there is nothing remotely attractive about going to Hopkins.
I'd do Delaware and then go to a better grad school.
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer
Anonymous wrote:Would you rather go to Delaware State University to play D1 soccer or Johns Hopkins to play D3 soccer