Anonymous wrote:Kids across the system are less motivated and under prepared compare to two years ago. Even the 9th grade magnet cohort at RM. Even advanced students in AP classes. Don’t blame the lottery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery
No, there is plenty we don't know. Do they lottery within each eligible school cohort or within the overall pool, for example?
It sounded like last year may have been a general pool but people were selected for the poll based on local norms of the top 15%. It wouldn't be surprising if they improved the process going forward. I remember reading all the doom and gloom about the cohort criteria a few years ago but in reality by the second year they'd improved it to the point that the admitted students were just as strong or stronger than the old pre-universal screening system that relied on subjective factors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery
Do you think that MCPS would allow for a chance outcome where girls were not evenly represented? Not likely right? So there is in fact information that is not publicly disclosed that would be important for people to know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's simple.
If MCPS is honest, open and transparent, they publish the data like any taxpayer expects their State Government employees to do. Anything less is unacceptable.
The comment about a question that a government official should be happy to provide isor getting a defensive reaction when asking a simple question over ajust looking to stir up controversy and resentment, shows just how sensitized some posters are to MCPS complaints (most likely upper management and the board).freaking lottery
I'm an older person and one bit of Wisdom I'm certain of. When your intentions are pure, your heart is with the children, and you're honest in deed and word; you really don't fear or care about what others say. It's mainly when you know you've done wrong, or lied, or did things for your career versus the innocent; that you get defensive.
If the lottery is perfect, why doesn't MCPS release how it is performed, by whom, etc.? Only if they were not truthful regarding the method, would it be problematic. Otherwise, there's nothing to fear. All these years MCPS has never learned that Honesty is the Best Policy.
They did when they told you it was a lottery. The pick names for a pool and pick X names at random. It isn't complicated. You're just trying to make it into some nefarious conspiracy even though there's nothing to this.
Anonymous wrote:It's simple.
If MCPS is honest, open and transparent, they publish the data like any taxpayer expects their State Government employees to do. Anything less is unacceptable.
Anonymous wrote:It's simple.
If MCPS is honest, open and transparent, they publish the data like any taxpayer expects their State Government employees to do. Anything less is unacceptable.
The comment about a question that a government official should be happy to provide isor getting a defensive reaction when asking a simple question over ajust looking to stir up controversy and resentment, shows just how sensitized some posters are to MCPS complaints (most likely upper management and the board).freaking lottery
I'm an older person and one bit of Wisdom I'm certain of. When your intentions are pure, your heart is with the children, and you're honest in deed and word; you really don't fear or care about what others say. It's mainly when you know you've done wrong, or lied, or did things for your career versus the innocent; that you get defensive.
If the lottery is perfect, why doesn't MCPS release how it is performed, by whom, etc.? Only if they were not truthful regarding the method, would it be problematic. Otherwise, there's nothing to fear. All these years MCPS has never learned that Honesty is the Best Policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery
No, there is plenty we don't know. Do they lottery within each eligible school cohort or within the overall pool, for example?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No way they would release that and fuel the outrage. Be it parent on admin, Parent on parent or school on school. It isn’t equal nor should it be.
There is a good chance the OP already knows this and is just looking to stir up controversy and resentment.
Why would this post stir up controversy and resentment? That makes no sense.
The process should be transparent and it should make sense. That is not controversial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery
No, there is plenty we don't know. Do they lottery within each eligible school cohort or within the overall pool, for example?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No way they would release that and fuel the outrage. Be it parent on admin, Parent on parent or school on school. It isn’t equal nor should it be.
There is a good chance the OP already knows this and is just looking to stir up controversy and resentment.
Why would this post stir up controversy and resentment? That makes no sense.
The process should be transparent and it should make sense. That is not controversial.
This is DCUM. Everything eventually devolves into controversy and resentment.
or getting a defensive reaction when asking a simple question over ajust looking to stir up controversy and resentment
, shows just how sensitized some posters are to MCPS complaints (most likely upper management and the board).freaking lottery
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since no one knows how this mysterious lottery works, other than the lower threshold, how would anyone know?
Please don't try to make this into something that it isn't it's just a freaking lottery everyone knows exactly how those work there's no mystery