Anonymous wrote:I have a job offer in a state that is known to be underrepresented in college admissions (think: Mississippi, but not Mississippi. The Mississippi of the North/ West). On one hand, I feel like this will improve my kids' chances of getting into a top college (they will also have legacy status at a top 25 university, but I don't know if it would be a good fit for them, since it wasn't for me). I also feel like it will be fairly easy to be near the top of the class at any high school there.
OTOH, everyone I knew at my fancy college who went to random public high school in a rural state was VERY unprepared to compete with people who went to Exeter or Sidwell (or even a W school). I feel like it was a big hit to their self-esteem to lose their "big fish in a small pond" status. Private school locally would not be an option (would have to go to boarding school, but then would lose the geographical diversity bonus). So what say you, DCUM? Is it worth the tradeoff?
And since someone will inevitably ask (or, this being DCUM, assume), my kids are multiracial (part Asian, part URM, a little bit white, could check multiple boxes or none at all). Not sure if that makes them less or more likely to benefit from geographical diversity (which, after all, was invented to keep colleges mostly white and Christian).
In the 1980s, this kind of thinking made sense.
In the age of Khan Academy, there’s just no way an affluent kid who deserves to be at a T25 school needs to be spoon fed AP courses. A bright kid should be able to use a combination of web classes, self-study and tutoring to get up to speed, and affluent, T25-worthy kids should be the ones in charge of making that kind of thing happen. If you have to do more than pay bills and sign permission slips, your kid isn’t really a great T25 applicant.