There are still competitive colleges that are NOT need blind in admissions?!

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

I'm sure Cornell has Ivy rejects in it.

Students who want to work in SV.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

An imbecilic take, but your premise is flawed on a number of different fronts to begin with. WashU isn’t even at the level of Northwestern or JHU. Funny how you sneak Dartmouth in there — and Duke, for that matter. And who on earth is choosing Caltech over Princeton/Columbia?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

Where did you, your spouse, and your kids go to college?

Princeton. Husband went to Dartmouth. Kids are at Yale and Columbia. I was originally from St. Louis so I know it pretty well.

Ohhh, your husband went to Dartmouth. That explains so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

Where did you, your spouse, and your kids go to college?

Princeton. Husband went to Dartmouth. Kids are at Yale and Columbia. I was originally from St. Louis so I know it pretty well.

WashU boosters are the most hilarious. What is it with all those people who went to midwestern schools (Northwestern, WashU, UChicago) that they have to constantly blow their own horns for attention on DCUM? Didn't someone just post a BREAKING news thread about Northwestern a few days ago?

I had several siblings who went to WashU in the 80’s and they were each given a free ride — my parents had no money. Since when did WashU stop offering generous financial aid packages?

Ps. None of my siblings applied to Ivies so they were not Ivy rejects.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

OMG. Go away. 95% of Ivy applicants are not admitted, and most are smart, high-stats, hard working kids who go to great schools. They are not “rejects.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

Where did you, your spouse, and your kids go to college?

The quotes I’ve seen focus on “need blind” and they say they’re going to increase funding for financial aid, but I haven’t seen a commitment to “meet full need.”

At the end of the day, affluent students are more likely to be granted admission to these highly competitive schools as a result of advantages that they have that result in higher grades/test scores/etc. The cynic in me thinks they’ve run the numbers and figured out that the school is competitive enough now that they can admit without consideration of ability to pay and it is not likely to substantially change their financial picture. By not committing to meet full need, they aren’t taking a risk. If they over-admit poor kids, they just don’t give them all they need to attend, and they don’t show up. One thing most if these “need blind” schools don’t talk about is that the policy usually doesn’t apply to the wait list.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

Stanford and MIT are not. They beat most of the ivies in cross-admits except Harvard or Yale. Then there's Caltech competing with Princeton and Columbia, followed by another drop-off in student caliber at Duke and Chicago where they have to compete for kids from places like UPenn (and usually loses to the latter) and Dartmouth. Northwestern, JHU and WashU are the true schools for ivy rejects.

Anonymous wrote:Won't change the fact that it's full of ivy rejects.

Just like every non-Ivy school.

Where did you and your spouse and kids go to college?

That doesn't mean they are going to improve the amount of aid they give. WUSTL is super stingy with aid for lower income students.

Wonder if this is related to https://source.wustl.edu/2021/09/washington-university-managed-endowment-pool-generates-record-65-return/