Anonymous wrote:Is the purpose of TJ to provide a tech school for kids who are interested or is it to be the top school in the state/country?
If it is to provide a tech school for those interested in tech, it should be lottery. If it is to be the top school, that won’t work.
Check the TJ charter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ admission should be a pure lottery for all who meet application requirements.
Every school should have its quotas.
That’s the only thing hat would make it fair.
Might as well shut it down at that point since it will no longer serve its intended purpose.
And why is that it will not serve its intended purpose?
What’s the purpose? Pay for play?
If you aren’t happy with the situation, move to another district or go private
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ admission should be a pure lottery for all who meet application requirements.
Every school should have its quotas.
That’s the only thing hat would make it fair.
Might as well shut it down at that point since it will no longer serve its intended purpose.
And why is that it will not serve its intended purpose?
What’s the purpose? Pay for play?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ admission should be a pure lottery for all who meet application requirements.
Every school should have its quotas.
That’s the only thing hat would make it fair.
Might as well shut it down at that point since it will no longer serve its intended purpose.
Anonymous wrote:TJ admission should be a pure lottery for all who meet application requirements.
Every school should have its quotas.
That’s the only thing hat would make it fair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:promoting untalented with the lottery! what next??
That’s what the application criteria is for.
If all atJ kids would be talentet, why aren’t they all famous? Almost all of them are invisible.
Not if you follow the world of 13 year olds outside of Hollywood. Besides, if your kid peaks by 13, you have a lot of problems. Ask Macaulay Culkin.
No one is insinuating being famous at 13.
Why aren’t they notable after college graduation and into their careers? If they were so talented we’d have heard of them.
Look up notable alumni and you will see the names. But most are very happy and successful private people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:promoting untalented with the lottery! what next??
That’s what the application criteria is for.
If all atJ kids would be talentet, why aren’t they all famous? Almost all of them are invisible.
Not if you follow the world of 13 year olds outside of Hollywood. Besides, if your kid peaks by 13, you have a lot of problems. Ask Macaulay Culkin.
No one is insinuating being famous at 13.
Why aren’t they notable after college graduation and into their careers? If they were so talented we’d have heard of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:promoting untalented with the lottery! what next??
That’s what the application criteria is for.
If all atJ kids would be talentet, why aren’t they all famous? Almost all of them are invisible.
Not if you follow the world of 13 year olds outside of Hollywood. Besides, if your kid peaks by 13, you have a lot of problems. Ask Macaulay Culkin.
No one is insinuating being famous at 13.
Why aren’t they notable after college graduation and into their careers? If they were so talented we’d have heard of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:promoting untalented with the lottery! what next??
That’s what the application criteria is for.
If all atJ kids would be talentet, why aren’t they all famous? Almost all of them are invisible.
Not if you follow the world of 13 year olds outside of Hollywood. Besides, if your kid peaks by 13, you have a lot of problems. Ask Macaulay Culkin.