Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand by this has no traction. Why are parents okay with HS aged kids getting no instruction for *11* instructional days? And now moving APs? Makeup days exist for things like Muslims observing Eid. No religion should be dictating whether kids take major national exams. Let alone 8 different religions.
I don’t get the outrage at two books in the library, while thousands of kids aren’t being allowed to take APs with the rest of the nation. This is what the WaPo should focus on.
Of course late testing means different tests than everyone else. Which means scores will be late.
I hate this so much.
Anonymous wrote:Forget book banning, THIS is what the SB needs to actually focus on fixing NOW. They screwed up with the O days, they need to change this back for kids.
Anonymous wrote:“ The committee came up with recommendations, but I wouldn't call them good.
In fact, the School Board's lawyer stated that the religious holidays were very likely illegal, which is why we have the even worse O day situation.
Moving the AP test dates is ridiculous and could actually harm students.”
The answer here is NOT to bow to the pressure and just give out the extra 4 holidays. It is to go back to the approach it sounded like FCPS was proposing when O days came up initially - avoid FCPS tests those days and tell schools not to schedule big one time only things like school plays, graduation, etc (non-recurring) those days and tell teachers kids get X days to make up the work or tests.
But do away with trying to literally grind the entire district to a half those days.
Anonymous wrote:Part of the spike in vacancies on the Jewish holidays may be that the other school systems around is gave them off so if you have kids in another district like Loudoun you may have wanted to take the day. Plus the first one tacked on to a long weekend.
More comparable would be if in a normal year like 2019 the system usually had a hard time staffing those days OR to ask teachers that took those days off to identify if they did so for a religious vs for a logistical reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Forget book banning, THIS is what the SB needs to actually focus on fixing NOW. They screwed up with the O days, they need to change this back for kids.
They won't fix it.
There was some sort of committee with all sorts of groups represented that came up with some good recommendations for a calendar based of stats of the various groups represented at fcps.
The school board tossed out the recommendations and came up with this mess.
It took months of school board meetings to debate it.
Those five minutes spent on the porno books wouldn't make a dent in the time that it took for the school board to create this calendar. It will take a year of meetings to fix it, or make it worse knowing this school board.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like the real problem is College Board scheduling AP exams on days of religious observance. They could have scheduled around it but instead decided to give the middle finger to observant Muslims.
If it was an exam scheduled for Easter lots of people would be singing a different tune on this.
Anonymous wrote:Forget book banning, THIS is what the SB needs to actually focus on fixing NOW. They screwed up with the O days, they need to change this back for kids.