Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one knows why the incidence of allergic disease is on the rise. There are several hypotheses. Reputable studies have been conducted to show it is not simply diagnosis that has risen, the actual incidence has increased in the populations studied. One of the most compelling hypotheses is that without many germs to fight, the immune system begins to overreact. This is called the hygiene hypothesis. There is evidence that children who grew up on farms are more protected than those who grow up in the cities and suburbs. However, this is just a hypothesis at this point. The current thinking is to expose your child to as many foods as early as possible. My child has multiple food allergies and when she was small the prevailing advice was to avoid foods religiously, I wish we had known better then. However, I know science changes and our knowledge continues to evolve. Oral immunotherapy studies have gone well and may be a possibility for a cure.
But food exposure doesn’t make sense. Before globalization our diets were way way narrower. Sure Asians have milk intolerance but it’s not like huge swaths of a society were allergic to foreign foods. Most Europeans I know loathe peanut butter and just eat hazelnuts. I never had a hazelnut until my 20s.
Anonymous wrote:Simple. Most of the food we now consume is not whole. It’s all be genetically engineered in some way robbing it of nutrients.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one’s mentioned increased c-section rates. Something about vaginal birth is good for the baby’s gut, or so they say.
My anecdata is:
DS1 - non-medicated vaginal birth; nut allergy
DS2 - C-section; no allergies
I realize I'm only 1 person, but it's very common for 1st borns to be allergic, and less common for 2nd.
I do think it relates to the gut though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Children don't get a dirty younger any more. My mom and dad kept things super clean for me and I have the most allergies. Also, kids would just die younger (choke to death) or have low level allergies their whole lives and no one would care. I'm allergic to both wheat and dairy, they cause digestive issues and eczema for me, that I've had since the age of 3. Stoped eating them at 40 and the issues stopped. No one had ever thought to check.
But are digestive issues and eczema really allergies or are they intolerance? I would consider those to be an intolerance not a true allergic response. Not referring to PP, but intolerances are often incorrectly called allergies. But true allergies are on the rise as well, no doubt.
Both dairy and wheat came back on my allergy blood IGE test at the allergist office as allergies, along with shellfish, which makes my face swell. So, yes, I have been officially diagnosed with allergies by an MD 40 years after I started showing symptoms,.which were ignored.
It's kinda nice not to have eczema over my hands and feet, coated in steroid cream, and not have explosive IBS for the first time in years.
A lot of these things were ignored and shrugged off in the past as "not really allergies." Now you can test for some.
Anonymous wrote:No one’s mentioned increased c-section rates. Something about vaginal birth is good for the baby’s gut, or so they say.
Anonymous wrote:Our food supply has a lot of issues. But also our kids grow up in too sterile of environments. I can’t even imagine how bad allergies are going to be for pandemic babies. I think they are going to be some pretty unhealthy kids
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It seems like there are so many children with nut, dairy, soy, etc. allergies these days, way more than ever in history. What causes this? What did children with egg or dairy allergies do 100 years ago?
They were sickly and many died. Just like babies in developing countries today.
Anonymous wrote:No one knows why the incidence of allergic disease is on the rise. There are several hypotheses. Reputable studies have been conducted to show it is not simply diagnosis that has risen, the actual incidence has increased in the populations studied. One of the most compelling hypotheses is that without many germs to fight, the immune system begins to overreact. This is called the hygiene hypothesis. There is evidence that children who grew up on farms are more protected than those who grow up in the cities and suburbs. However, this is just a hypothesis at this point. The current thinking is to expose your child to as many foods as early as possible. My child has multiple food allergies and when she was small the prevailing advice was to avoid foods religiously, I wish we had known better then. However, I know science changes and our knowledge continues to evolve. Oral immunotherapy studies have gone well and may be a possibility for a cure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Children don't get a dirty younger any more. My mom and dad kept things super clean for me and I have the most allergies. Also, kids would just die younger (choke to death) or have low level allergies their whole lives and no one would care. I'm allergic to both wheat and dairy, they cause digestive issues and eczema for me, that I've had since the age of 3. Stoped eating them at 40 and the issues stopped. No one had ever thought to check.
But are digestive issues and eczema really allergies or are they intolerance? I would consider those to be an intolerance not a true allergic response. Not referring to PP, but intolerances are often incorrectly called allergies. But true allergies are on the rise as well, no doubt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Apparently the relative rates of different allergies vary by country. Israel has pretty few peanut allergies and lots of sesame allergies.
Really? Wow that's crazy about sesame. Don't they mix tahina in with breast milk or formula for their babies? Kidding but not entirely. That would go against the early exposure hypothesis anyway.
I am not Israeli. Anonymous wrote:Apparently the relative rates of different allergies vary by country. Israel has pretty few peanut allergies and lots of sesame allergies.