Anonymous wrote:If they do a total rezone just send Dufief, Travilah and Stone Mill all to Crown. Dufief's main issue initially with A-D was that they were the only ones being pulled from the Wootton cluster and it was being done in a way that made no sense. If it's all three schools that are clearly closer to Crown than Wootton, have at it.
Also, it's becoming more and more obvious that Fallsmead/Lakewood care more about Wootton staying on the Parkway than keeping the cluster together. The North Potomac schools that don't really care about Option H have been quiet and going along with anti-H anyway, but now that it's clear no one cares about keeping them in the cluster hopefully they get more vocal about getting their kids into a safe school. Because this sudden change to "actually, we don't want repairs" doesn't help the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues
I'm the poster you replied to. I'm talking about not moving Wootton to Crown, but going with another option and rezoning Wootton.
MCPS gave Wootton the option of staying together and adding Fields Rd. But because of the petition they will probably not do that.
But I hope they now rezone Wootton (not just Dufief but everyone in Crown's vicinity)
Move Travilah to QO.
Move Dufief to Crown.
Dufief, Travilah, Fallsmead, Fields Rd, Brown Station, StoneMill, Rachel Carson - no one should get any special treatment - move them all to the closest high school even if it means a split articulation.
House of cards
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a much higher priority for Wootton parents on keeping the Wootton pkwy building open than on keeping the 6 ES’s together articulating together to the same school.
I would say that’s probably true. Many of them are split up between Wootton and Churchill after middle school anyway. We are extremely close to Wootton. Would have no problem with some movement where other very close in schools got redistricted to Wootton and those much further out redistricted elsewhere-but I want the school where it is.
That would be an interesting poll. If I were mcps, I'd try to find this out. They offered Crown thinking that was what many Wootton parents wanted (students suddenly get a new building and don't even need to go through the pain of a two year holding school). But there's a ton of pushback. I think it would be interesting to find out Wootton parents' perspective on a) keep the community together in the new Crown building(and add another ES in) versus b) keep the old Wootton building, and stick with wherever it is on the improvement list, but remain the school remains subject to redrawing the lines as described in Options 1-G.
Anonymous wrote:Even if MCPS stopped all construction to only replace Wootton they’d still complain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
That would be an interesting poll. If I were mcps, I'd try to find this out. They offered Crown thinking that was what many Wootton parents wanted (students suddenly get a new building and don't even need to go through the pain of a two year holding school). But there's a ton of pushback. I think it would be interesting to find out Wootton parents' perspective on a) keep the community together in the new Crown building(and add another ES in) versus b) keep the old Wootton building, and stick with wherever it is on the improvement list, but remain the school remains subject to redrawing the lines as described in Options 1-G.
This was my understanding. After the superintendent proposed Crown as a holding school, Wootton parents on Nextdoor immediately jumped on the idea, citing how bad the building conditions were for Wootton. Crown parents protested about the idea of Crown becoming a holding school, since they've been promised a high school for awhile.
Option H felt like a compromise position to both camps; Wootton's building issues are solved and Crown neighborhood students go to their local school.
My cousins live in the Crown neighborhood and all they really care about is that their local students go to the school; they really don't care about whether or not Wootton goes there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues
Replacing the Wootton building with the Crown building, and rezoning some to Gaithersburg and RM.
Wow at first it’s Wootton is just moved there
Then it’s we’re just adding crown
Then it became we are adding fields road
Then we need to rezone Dufief and cold spring
Now it’s rezone some to Gaithersburg and RM
We knew it. It’s not just moving Wootton to crown. It’s closing Wootton and spread Wootton assets around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a much higher priority for Wootton parents on keeping the Wootton pkwy building open than on keeping the 6 ES’s together articulating together to the same school.
I would say that’s probably true. Many of them are split up between Wootton and Churchill after middle school anyway. We are extremely close to Wootton. Would have no problem with some movement where other very close in schools got redistricted to Wootton and those much further out redistricted elsewhere-but I want the school where it is.
That would be an interesting poll. If I were mcps, I'd try to find this out. They offered Crown thinking that was what many Wootton parents wanted (students suddenly get a new building and don't even need to go through the pain of a two year holding school). But there's a ton of pushback. I think it would be interesting to find out Wootton parents' perspective on a) keep the community together in the new Crown building(and add another ES in) versus b) keep the old Wootton building, and stick with wherever it is on the improvement list, but remain the school remains subject to redrawing the lines as described in Options 1-G.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues
I'm the poster you replied to. I'm talking about not moving Wootton to Crown, but going with another option and rezoning Wootton.
MCPS gave Wootton the option of staying together and adding Fields Rd. But because of the petition they will probably not do that.
But I hope they now rezone Wootton (not just Dufief but everyone in Crown's vicinity)
Move Travilah to QO.
Move Dufief to Crown.
Dufief, Travilah, Fallsmead, Fields Rd, Brown Station, StoneMill, Rachel Carson - no one should get any special treatment - move them all to the closest high school even if it means a split articulation.
House of cards
They need to restart boundary process to do that as none of the options have these.
Most likely it’s still crown as holding school. Mark my words
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There seems to be a much higher priority for Wootton parents on keeping the Wootton pkwy building open than on keeping the 6 ES’s together articulating together to the same school.
I would say that’s probably true. Many of them are split up between Wootton and Churchill after middle school anyway. We are extremely close to Wootton. Would have no problem with some movement where other very close in schools got redistricted to Wootton and those much further out redistricted elsewhere-but I want the school where it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues
I'm the poster you replied to. I'm talking about not moving Wootton to Crown, but going with another option and rezoning Wootton.
MCPS gave Wootton the option of staying together and adding Fields Rd. But because of the petition they will probably not do that.
But I hope they now rezone Wootton (not just Dufief but everyone in Crown's vicinity)
Move Travilah to QO.
Move Dufief to Crown.
Dufief, Travilah, Fallsmead, Fields Rd, Brown Station, StoneMill, Rachel Carson - no one should get any special treatment - move them all to the closest high school even if it means a split articulation.
House of cards
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues
I'm the poster you replied to. I'm talking about not moving Wootton to Crown, but going with another option and rezoning Wootton.
MCPS gave Wootton the option of staying together and adding Fields Rd. But because of the petition they will probably not do that.
But I hope they now rezone Wootton (not just Dufief but everyone in Crown's vicinity)
Move Travilah to QO.
Move Dufief to Crown.
Dufief, Travilah, Fallsmead, Fields Rd, Brown Station, StoneMill, Rachel Carson - no one should get any special treatment - move them all to the closest high school even if it means a split articulation.
House of cards
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bring on your lawsuits Wootton - you may not move to Crown, but you sure as hell will be rezoned and that is the way it should be. You have no legal standing when MCPS says they rezoned some of you because of proximity.
Are you talking about closing Wootton or just rezoning some to crown? They’re completely different issues