Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listening to Va SC now. It sounds like arguments to go against Referendum vote is stronger on the law.
Going against the expressly stated will of the people is dangerous business. I’d argue it needs to be stronger than 51% if this court wants to retain any shred of its credibility.
Anonymous wrote:Listening to Va SC now. It sounds like arguments to go against Referendum vote is stronger on the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Playing to the rubes, another case of trying to make something that happens frequently, for justifiable reasons sound "outrageous" and belittling. David McIntosh of the Federalist Society should know better, his boss Leonard Leo makes a living off this nonsense (both providing outside counsel and throwing sand in the gears and dust in the eyes).
MAGAs are always full of shit.
Yep maga dumbest cult ever
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Playing to the rubes, another case of trying to make something that happens frequently, for justifiable reasons sound "outrageous" and belittling. David McIntosh of the Federalist Society should know better, his boss Leonard Leo makes a living off this nonsense (both providing outside counsel and throwing sand in the gears and dust in the eyes).
MAGAs are always full of shit.
Anonymous wrote:
I wonder if Mr. McIntosh complained about Jason Miyares using outside counsel during his tenure as VA AG?
I'm guessing not, because, I guess, it's different when a Republican does it, I'm sure.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Judges are supposed to use the law in their judgements. Not politics.
Anonymous wrote:
Playing to the rubes, another case of trying to make something that happens frequently, for justifiable reasons sound "outrageous" and belittling. David McIntosh of the Federalist Society should know better, his boss Leonard Leo makes a living off this nonsense (both providing outside counsel and throwing sand in the gears and dust in the eyes).
Anonymous wrote:
Where are you seeing that state constitutional law was his specialty?
If that is the case, he has failed in his specialty.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it is strange to hire outside counsel. I am assuming that outside counsel wrote the brief. According to one analysis, its defense of the wording of the referendum fails to defend the "restore fairness" part. Doesn't sound like that is dollars well spent.
I have not seen the brief, however.