Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, not a parent of Madison, but for them to transfer they would have to be from district unless they have a parent working in Fcps.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a Robo/Mad write up?
Absolute coin flip of a game. Robinson came out hot and were up 3-1 early in the 2nd. Madison then scored 3 goals in ~3 minutes and went into half 4-3. 2nd half was 1-1 overall for Warhawk 5-4 victory. #5 Lynchburg commit was phenomenal tonight, even against Penn State commit. Robinson controlled the faceoffs but 11 LSM for Madison caused a lot of 50/50s at the X. #8 York commit for Robo looked really good as well. #14 was the best player on the field for Robinson- 3 goals and the offense ran through him. Goalie change for Madison at halftime from the Senior to the Landon transfer. Night and day difference, 2nd half goalie was lights out.
It’ll be a lot of fun to see these teams play later into the year and they will likely see each other again in June. It’s a clear three headed monster in 6A between Indy, Madison, Robo. Indy seems to be the team to beat right now but there is opportunity for that gap to close as Madison/Robinson have the two best coaches in the state. Both teams missing key players as well. We’re in for a fun one this year.
Thanks for the write-up, sounds like awesome game. One quick question - and forgive if dumb - but how does one transfer from Landon to public school? they already happened to live in Madison district?
Huh. So lights out goalie - good enough to have aspirations to play for top program like Landon - just happened to live in Madison district? Funny how that doesn't seem to happen for Falls Church or Annadale or other schools..
Why would a really good goalie want to play for Annandale or Falls Church LOL
Playing for a team that needs a good goalie would mean you're THE GUY and you're developing against the most shots and having to perform.
Going to Madison means you're playing behind a much higher caliber defense, so the game reps you're taking are less frequent etc.
The obvious answer is Madison is higher profile and gets you more of a chance with college. But if you're having to drop from Landon to Madison it means walk-on time in college if you want to try and play.
Well, if you are actually recruitable it likely means D3 like Roanoke and maybe CNU.
Anonymous wrote:Woodson 6, Herndon 5
Long time NOVA lacrosse fan and parent of two boys (9 & 12) in the Woodson pyramid. Decided to start taking them to some games this year and caught both the Centerville opener and tonight vs Herndon.
Monday’s result vs Centreville was a frustrating one for Woodson. They were clearly the better team but fell victim to a sloppy first game after having a bye week to start the season, and it showed. They dominated possession after possession offensively and generated quality looks all night, but couldn’t finish to save their life. It was one of the worst shooting performances I’ve seen. I had #24 for Woodson around 2 for 17 on the night shooting and the rest of the group wasn’t much better. Woodson dug themselves into a hole, rallied late to force overtime, and even in OT had multiple point blank chances turned away before Centerville won it in double OT on EMO. Credit to Centerville, they played hard and their attackman #3 looked like an all-state level player. I heard it was his first game back after missing all preseason and they looked like a completely different team with him. Overall you could sense the frustration from Woodson as it felt like nothing bounced their way and that if they played that game 10 times, they would win that game at least 9 of them. It was probably a needed early wake up call.
Tonight’s matchup vs Herndon was a much better indicator. Herndon looked like a top team, I can see why they’re ranked in the 7 to 10 range in the state. Their York commit, #1 at attack is a problem and their SSDMs / poles were all over the field. This is also a group that handled Lake Braddock in a scrimmage and hadn’t really been tested yet.
Game wise, Woodson again started slow shooting and went down 2-0 despite getting clean looks almost every possession. In the second quarter they settled in and took a 4-3 lead into half. Early third they pushed it to 6-4 and from there it felt like they were in control. Woodson slowed things down, moved it well, and the refs started putting really early stall calls on them which made the second half a bit of a game of keep away. Herndon made a push late, but had no answer for Woodson’s goalie and the Cavs closed it out 6-5. It felt like if the refs weren’t issuing super early stall calls that Woodson could have kept scoring every possession. It became a weird game script in the 2nd half.
Overall it felt like a quality top 10 matchup. After the first quarter Woodson played cleaner, looked more composed, and felt like the slightly better team the rest of the way. Based on what I’ve seen and some early results, it feels like Woodson and West Potomac are right there with Lake Braddock not far behind in what should be a tight race out of Region C for the last spot in states. Should be a fun one to follow!
Anonymous wrote:can we put the bums who can't afford to live closer to DC on a different forum. People only care about Nova lax on here (fairfax teams + yorktown). let the loudoun guys go argue somewhere else
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the team that is afraid to schedule Riverside, Robinson, Madison, Langley, Yorktown, etc. this year so that nobody takes them seriously.
Laughable. Riverside coach asked not to play Indy this year(probably bc he hates DW). As for the other 6A teams, it could be a lot of different reasons. There are teams that have to be scheduled, other teams that have traditionally been on their schedule, first year in 6A...etc. Indy is a strong team again this year and will be competitive. They will have to earn it as the season goes on but the comment about no one takes them seriously? Maybe Riverslide should have taken them more seriously when they didn't make States last year. I know the players did but probably not their horrible, entitled parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, not a parent of Madison, but for them to transfer they would have to be from district unless they have a parent working in Fcps.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a Robo/Mad write up?
Absolute coin flip of a game. Robinson came out hot and were up 3-1 early in the 2nd. Madison then scored 3 goals in ~3 minutes and went into half 4-3. 2nd half was 1-1 overall for Warhawk 5-4 victory. #5 Lynchburg commit was phenomenal tonight, even against Penn State commit. Robinson controlled the faceoffs but 11 LSM for Madison caused a lot of 50/50s at the X. #8 York commit for Robo looked really good as well. #14 was the best player on the field for Robinson- 3 goals and the offense ran through him. Goalie change for Madison at halftime from the Senior to the Landon transfer. Night and day difference, 2nd half goalie was lights out.
It’ll be a lot of fun to see these teams play later into the year and they will likely see each other again in June. It’s a clear three headed monster in 6A between Indy, Madison, Robo. Indy seems to be the team to beat right now but there is opportunity for that gap to close as Madison/Robinson have the two best coaches in the state. Both teams missing key players as well. We’re in for a fun one this year.
Thanks for the write-up, sounds like awesome game. One quick question - and forgive if dumb - but how does one transfer from Landon to public school? they already happened to live in Madison district?
Huh. So lights out goalie - good enough to have aspirations to play for top program like Landon - just happened to live in Madison district? Funny how that doesn't seem to happen for Falls Church or Annadale or other schools..
Why would a really good goalie want to play for Annandale or Falls Church LOL
Playing for a team that needs a good goalie would mean you're THE GUY and you're developing against the most shots and having to perform.
Going to Madison means you're playing behind a much higher caliber defense, so the game reps you're taking are less frequent etc.
The obvious answer is Madison is higher profile and gets you more of a chance with college. But if you're having to drop from Landon to Madison it means walk-on time in college if you want to try and play.
Well, if you are actually recruitable it likely means D3 like Roanoke and maybe CNU.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, not a parent of Madison, but for them to transfer they would have to be from district unless they have a parent working in Fcps.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a Robo/Mad write up?
Absolute coin flip of a game. Robinson came out hot and were up 3-1 early in the 2nd. Madison then scored 3 goals in ~3 minutes and went into half 4-3. 2nd half was 1-1 overall for Warhawk 5-4 victory. #5 Lynchburg commit was phenomenal tonight, even against Penn State commit. Robinson controlled the faceoffs but 11 LSM for Madison caused a lot of 50/50s at the X. #8 York commit for Robo looked really good as well. #14 was the best player on the field for Robinson- 3 goals and the offense ran through him. Goalie change for Madison at halftime from the Senior to the Landon transfer. Night and day difference, 2nd half goalie was lights out.
It’ll be a lot of fun to see these teams play later into the year and they will likely see each other again in June. It’s a clear three headed monster in 6A between Indy, Madison, Robo. Indy seems to be the team to beat right now but there is opportunity for that gap to close as Madison/Robinson have the two best coaches in the state. Both teams missing key players as well. We’re in for a fun one this year.
Thanks for the write-up, sounds like awesome game. One quick question - and forgive if dumb - but how does one transfer from Landon to public school? they already happened to live in Madison district?
Huh. So lights out goalie - good enough to have aspirations to play for top program like Landon - just happened to live in Madison district? Funny how that doesn't seem to happen for Falls Church or Annadale or other schools..
Why would a really good goalie want to play for Annandale or Falls Church LOL
Playing for a team that needs a good goalie would mean you're THE GUY and you're developing against the most shots and having to perform.
Going to Madison means you're playing behind a much higher caliber defense, so the game reps you're taking are less frequent etc.
The obvious answer is Madison is higher profile and gets you more of a chance with college. But if you're having to drop from Landon to Madison it means walk-on time in college if you want to try and play.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t follow why Indy would be ranked alongside Madison or Robinson. Madison scheduled Langley, Yorktown, and Robinson to start the season and beat them all. Indy played a weak team yesterday and ran up 17 goals, which seems to be their normal way of doing things. But until they beat a good team, why would they be in the discussion with the proven teams?.
Because, while just a scrimmage, Indy won 9-1 over Madison and was the dominate team.
Meh. The game was 2-1 Indy at the halfway point. Madison played second and third string players and several guys who are on the JV team the whole second half, while Independence kept their starters in the entire game and had a number of players who never saw the field, despite it being a preseason scrimmage.
OK, so starters on starters, Indy was a bit better. Which makes sense that Indy would be ranked alongside Madison and Robinson. You can't seriously argue that Indy is not in the top three given how weak the whole class is this year. I have them at #1 for now, but we will see.
beating the Madison backups by 7-0 in the second half of a scrimmage, and running up 17 goals on Loudon County, doesn't show where Indy stands relative to the top 4-5 teams in the state. it is a shame that they did not schedule any of the teams that they want to measure themselves against. my guess is that Indy's undisciplined style of play and its lack of competition would hold them back from beating Robinson, Madison, Riverside, and possibly a couple of others. I would put them top 5, but definitely not #1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, not a parent of Madison, but for them to transfer they would have to be from district unless they have a parent working in Fcps.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone got a Robo/Mad write up?
Absolute coin flip of a game. Robinson came out hot and were up 3-1 early in the 2nd. Madison then scored 3 goals in ~3 minutes and went into half 4-3. 2nd half was 1-1 overall for Warhawk 5-4 victory. #5 Lynchburg commit was phenomenal tonight, even against Penn State commit. Robinson controlled the faceoffs but 11 LSM for Madison caused a lot of 50/50s at the X. #8 York commit for Robo looked really good as well. #14 was the best player on the field for Robinson- 3 goals and the offense ran through him. Goalie change for Madison at halftime from the Senior to the Landon transfer. Night and day difference, 2nd half goalie was lights out.
It’ll be a lot of fun to see these teams play later into the year and they will likely see each other again in June. It’s a clear three headed monster in 6A between Indy, Madison, Robo. Indy seems to be the team to beat right now but there is opportunity for that gap to close as Madison/Robinson have the two best coaches in the state. Both teams missing key players as well. We’re in for a fun one this year.
Thanks for the write-up, sounds like awesome game. One quick question - and forgive if dumb - but how does one transfer from Landon to public school? they already happened to live in Madison district?
Huh. So lights out goalie - good enough to have aspirations to play for top program like Landon - just happened to live in Madison district? Funny how that doesn't seem to happen for Falls Church or Annadale or other schools..
Why would a really good goalie want to play for Annandale or Falls Church LOL
Anonymous wrote:the team that is afraid to schedule Riverside, Robinson, Madison, Langley, Yorktown, etc. this year so that nobody takes them seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t follow why Indy would be ranked alongside Madison or Robinson. Madison scheduled Langley, Yorktown, and Robinson to start the season and beat them all. Indy played a weak team yesterday and ran up 17 goals, which seems to be their normal way of doing things. But until they beat a good team, why would they be in the discussion with the proven teams?.
Because, while just a scrimmage, Indy won 9-1 over Madison and was the dominate team.
Meh. The game was 2-1 Indy at the halfway point. Madison played second and third string players and several guys who are on the JV team the whole second half, while Independence kept their starters in the entire game and had a number of players who never saw the field, despite it being a preseason scrimmage.
OK, so starters on starters, Indy was a bit better. Which makes sense that Indy would be ranked alongside Madison and Robinson. You can't seriously argue that Indy is not in the top three given how weak the whole class is this year. I have them at #1 for now, but we will see.
To be clear, I think Indy totally deserves to be in the same tier as Madison and Robinson, and maybe even the favorite of the three. My point was just that the 9-1 score is misleading.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Riverside 17 - Oakton 4.... Is that a correct score? If so, any details about that one?
Here are the details. Riverside scored 10 seconds into the game and it was never competitive. Oakmont scored to make it 6-1 and one of the kids yelled - we’re back! Well not so much. It was 11-1 at the half. Teams cannot deal with Riverside #8, #24, #23, #2. Too much scoring depth. The D does not give up goals when teams have run their offense against a set D. The goalie is good as well. Finally - for Oakton - I am not sure which game the freshman played in JV or Varsity - but if they played in the JV game - it was a tie. So when one considers Riverside has 16 Juniors on the Varsity roster - Riverside is set for years to come.
Riverside is the class of Virginia public school lacrosse.
Who won 5a last year?
Anonymous wrote:the team that is afraid to schedule Riverside, Robinson, Madison, Langley, Yorktown, etc. this year so that nobody takes them seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t follow why Indy would be ranked alongside Madison or Robinson. Madison scheduled Langley, Yorktown, and Robinson to start the season and beat them all. Indy played a weak team yesterday and ran up 17 goals, which seems to be their normal way of doing things. But until they beat a good team, why would they be in the discussion with the proven teams?.
Because, while just a scrimmage, Indy won 9-1 over Madison and was the dominate team.
Meh. The game was 2-1 Indy at the halfway point. Madison played second and third string players and several guys who are on the JV team the whole second half, while Independence kept their starters in the entire game and had a number of players who never saw the field, despite it being a preseason scrimmage.
OK, so starters on starters, Indy was a bit better. Which makes sense that Indy would be ranked alongside Madison and Robinson. You can't seriously argue that Indy is not in the top three given how weak the whole class is this year. I have them at #1 for now, but we will see.