Anonymous
Post 09/29/2025 20:30     Subject: Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

It has been 19 days.

Could I have a cup of tea, sir?
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2025 17:52     Subject: Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:What does another "round of options" mean? Are they actually going to pick one of the new options? When are they going to make a meaningful decision?


I expect there will be additional options created that differ from the first four. The superintendent makes his recommendation of the best overall option in Dec/Jan, and then there will be public hearings, and the board will vote on it in March.
Anonymous
Post 09/10/2025 17:22     Subject: Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

What does another "round of options" mean? Are they actually going to pick one of the new options? When are they going to make a meaningful decision?
Anonymous
Post 09/09/2025 13:02     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

What are the "hottest button" issues that folks would like to see resolved in Round 2 vs. Round 1?
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:53     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible


These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.


Sorry, kind of new here. What is the "proposed 6 region model"?


A still-developing plan for having six regions for special programs like STEM, arts, etc.


This article explains more:

https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/08/22/mcps-proposed-regional-program-themes/
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:52     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible


These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.


Sorry, kind of new here. What is the "proposed 6 region model"?


A still-developing plan for having six regions for special programs like STEM, arts, etc.
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:48     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible


These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.


Sorry, kind of new here. What is the "proposed 6 region model"?
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:46     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible


These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.


+1. If only the first round options had also considered them.
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:32     Subject: Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

To me, it makes more sense and cost savings not to do any changes to walking zones neighborhood. Our home high school is within walking zones, and 2 options cause is to be bused 10 to 15 mins (if I drive kids by myself with zero traffic) which is really weird. School bus may take 20 to 30 mins or more depends on the number of stops or traffic.
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 14:13     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible


These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 12:23     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?


Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:

Next Round of Boundary Study Options

Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options

● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 12:12     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/


Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 07:43     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?


October 13:

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Anonymous
Post 09/08/2025 07:29     Subject: Re:Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
Anonymous
Post 09/06/2025 22:06     Subject: Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Honestly Option 4 looks the best – would turn QO into a solid high school in the county, and redistribute the area around far west River Road more equitably, as opposed to hoarding those students just for Northwest.


+1

Option 1 comes a close second.

This from a QO parent


"More equitably"? lol.


Yes we need more nerds from Dufief to bring QO up to par.