Anonymous wrote:What does another "round of options" mean? Are they actually going to pick one of the new options? When are they going to make a meaningful decision?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:
Next Round of Boundary Study Options
Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options
● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.
Sorry, kind of new here. What is the "proposed 6 region model"?
A still-developing plan for having six regions for special programs like STEM, arts, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:
Next Round of Boundary Study Options
Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options
● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.
Sorry, kind of new here. What is the "proposed 6 region model"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:
Next Round of Boundary Study Options
Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options
● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:
Next Round of Boundary Study Options
Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options
● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
These all sound like reasonable criteria to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Not really. We just have this list of "working assumptions" from the August BOE meeting:
Next Round of Boundary Study Options
Working Assumptions Aligned to Board Policy FAA Factors and Feedback from Initial Options
● Include Proposed 6 Region Model in option development
● Prioritize proximity of neighborhoods and communities to schools (this the #1 piece of feedback we have received from community engagement)
● Minimize length of school bus rides and maximize safe walk zones whenever possible
● Avoid disproportionate split articulation whenever possible
● Minimize disruptions for communities who have experienced recent boundary changes and those who experience additional school transitions (primary and intermediate schools)
● Maintain the 80 to 100 percent efficient facility utilization range for middle and high schools included in the boundary study scopes
● Consider costs for resources associated with options (staffing, facilities, transportation, etc.) in order to be fiscally responsible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Thank you. Do we have a preview of what they will look like?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
October 13:
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/news/mcps-news/2025/09/boundary-study-october-meetings/
Anonymous wrote:When are the next options (September 2025) coming ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly Option 4 looks the best – would turn QO into a solid high school in the county, and redistribute the area around far west River Road more equitably, as opposed to hoarding those students just for Northwest.
+1
Option 1 comes a close second.
This from a QO parent
"More equitably"? lol.