Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
I'm sure they will be able to find someone to take the job. The question is, will they be as good as the people that left?
Not being corrupt will be 3/4 of it
The payroll people were corrupt?
I don’t know if that pp is a Republican or a fan boi or 20 but they don’t seem to know anything. They have a lot of theories though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
I'm sure they will be able to find someone to take the job. The question is, will they be as good as the people that left?
Not being corrupt will be 3/4 of it
The payroll people were corrupt?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
I'm sure they will be able to find someone to take the job. The question is, will they be as good as the people that left?
Not being corrupt will be 3/4 of it
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Consider who the quitters are and what they’ve done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
I'm sure they will be able to find someone to take the job. The question is, will they be as good as the people that left?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
I’m sure there are people willing to work there. It’s kind of bizarre to think that it falls along political lines, rather than need/desperation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Good for them. But don’t think there aren’t people willing and able to take those jobs on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.
You really have a weird take on what’s going on over there. The people there aren’t quitting because they’re liberals, they’re quitting because he’s an @sshole who’s destroying the company and they have other options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sarcasm, I think. Elon seems to measure Twitter employees' worth by how much code they have written. Clearly, HR, payroll, compliance, legal, etc. are totally worthless then.
Because a coder for Twitter will be hard to replace quickly, since they know the product, and the product is complex, whereas it's easier to replace a non-coder - HR and payroll are generic jobs and not likely to be vary enormously from company to company. You can't parachute a FB coder to Twitter and expect them to be productive on day 1.
If you are in a field like HR or payroll and can literally work anywhere, why the F would you want to work at Twitter?
You don’t think there are independents and conservatives looking for work? BTW, there are entire contracting firms dedicated to HR and payroll who’d love the work.
It’s true that the work can be outsourced. If I there’s no one around to hand off the keys, it becomes difficult. Not to mention, unless you off shore it, chances are pretty good you’ll be paying more, not less than you were before. Outsourcing those functions make sense for small companies, not large ones.
I don’t know why you bring up independents and conservatives. Are they more likely to work in a toxic workplace for a mercurial boss?
I didn’t say overseas. There are US companies who do this. And yes, in this case independents and conservatives, who hated what Twitter were doing, would be willing to work for him.