Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Because I don't know what other books people are trying to ban. If you tell me, I'll give my opinion if you'd like it.

I have personally provided so many titles that you book banning fascists have ignored. Your ignorance isn’t my issue, it’s yours.

Typical progressive response. Anyone who doesn't want kids reading gay porn is a fascist. Lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Because I don't know what other books people are trying to ban. If you tell me, I'll give my opinion if you'd like it.

I have personally provided so many titles that you book banning fascists have ignored. Your ignorance isn’t my issue, it’s yours.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Because I don't know what other books people are trying to ban. If you tell me, I'll give my opinion if you'd like it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Because I don't know what other books people are trying to ban. If you tell me, I'll give my opinion if you'd like it.

I’m a DP from a few pages back who suggested you look into what is being banned in TX, FL, and even here in some local districts in VA. You’re hung up on 2 books. Go look at what some of your other book-banning buddies are trying to remove.
Can you not “do your own research”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Because I don't know what other books people are trying to ban. If you tell me, I'll give my opinion if you'd like it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the outrage. If you want to read any book, there are many places to access free books. No one is suggesting these books are banned everywhere. No author is being dragged out to the street to be tarred and feathered. Most people are just asking that there be some consideration to age-appropriate materials.
Why do we have G, PG and R rated movies? It is so that some content is restricted from children.
I use common sense media a lot to determine what I wanted DC to see and not see based on age appropriate psychosocial development. I feel like most good parents do this.

Nope. Many students do NOT have access to
Free books. Many students don’t have parents who will take them to a library or have the technology to read digitally.
They need to be available for all students. Removing books students previously had access to is banning. Plain and simple.

You want gay porn in schools because of poor people? Come on man.

It’s not gay porn. Look up the definition of porn FFS. And who cares if a book has gay characters?

I don't care about gay characters but pretending Genderqueer doesn't contain porn is simply crazy.

Tell us again what you think the porn is. Because every time this book comes up, not a one of you has read the book and it shows.

We've all seen screen shots of the porn it contains.

I mean this is literally one of the pictures someone objected to being a school library book because she claimed it started a porn addiction—

OK, now do the strap on blow-job and 4th graders having sex in Genderqueer and Lawn Boy.

No. Stay with THIS and tell us how is porn.

Because it one of the many many many books being censored.

Anonymous wrote:Okay, but this is 100 pages showing this is way beyond those two books, so why don't you address the other ones instead of bringing up the same thing over and over and over again as if they are the only two books being banned?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the outrage. If you want to read any book, there are many places to access free books. No one is suggesting these books are banned everywhere. No author is being dragged out to the street to be tarred and feathered. Most people are just asking that there be some consideration to age-appropriate materials.
Why do we have G, PG and R rated movies? It is so that some content is restricted from children.
I use common sense media a lot to determine what I wanted DC to see and not see based on age appropriate psychosocial development. I feel like most good parents do this.

Nope. Many students do NOT have access to
Free books. Many students don’t have parents who will take them to a library or have the technology to read digitally.
They need to be available for all students. Removing books students previously had access to is banning. Plain and simple.

You want gay porn in schools because of poor people? Come on man.

It’s not gay porn. Look up the definition of porn FFS. And who cares if a book has gay characters?

I don't care about gay characters but pretending Genderqueer doesn't contain porn is simply crazy.

Tell us again what you think the porn is. Because every time this book comes up, not a one of you has read the book and it shows.

We've all seen screen shots of the porn it contains.

I mean this is literally one of the pictures someone objected to being a school library book because she claimed it started a porn addiction—

OK, now do the strap on blow-job and 4th graders having sex in Genderqueer and Lawn Boy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the outrage. If you want to read any book, there are many places to access free books. No one is suggesting these books are banned everywhere. No author is being dragged out to the street to be tarred and feathered. Most people are just asking that there be some consideration to age-appropriate materials.
Why do we have G, PG and R rated movies? It is so that some content is restricted from children.
I use common sense media a lot to determine what I wanted DC to see and not see based on age appropriate psychosocial development. I feel like most good parents do this.

Nope. Many students do NOT have access to
Free books. Many students don’t have parents who will take them to a library or have the technology to read digitally.
They need to be available for all students. Removing books students previously had access to is banning. Plain and simple.

You want gay porn in schools because of poor people? Come on man.

It’s not gay porn. Look up the definition of porn FFS. And who cares if a book has gay characters?

I don't care about gay characters but pretending Genderqueer doesn't contain porn is simply crazy.

Tell us again what you think the porn is. Because every time this book comes up, not a one of you has read the book and it shows.

We've all seen screen shots of the porn it contains.

I mean this is literally one of the pictures someone objected to being a school library book because she claimed it started a porn addiction—

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a Venn diagram here of distrust of librarians and general misogyny.

The better diagram is people with education degrees and leftist activism.

God, I hope so. Your kids need our support. Your gay ones, your depressed ones, your kids in need of medication, hungry kids, ALL OF THEM.
Proud to be a leftist activist.

You want people who don't think like you sent to reeducation camp, don't you?

no, I want people like YOU to recognize that I'm a professional. If you don't trust educators, then why have school?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of you whining about these books in libraries allow your kids to have computers with the internet or allow them to have phones?

Because I'm LOL'ing at the pearl clutching over school libraries while not realized the entire universe of books, porn, chat rooms, dark web, etc. etc. your kids have access to. And can do so without you knowing.

So sit down. And leave the librarians alone. Worry about yourself.

So schools should have the same moral compass as pornhub. Got it.

That breeze you feel is the point, which you missed and went right over your head.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the outrage. If you want to read any book, there are many places to access free books. No one is suggesting these books are banned everywhere. No author is being dragged out to the street to be tarred and feathered. Most people are just asking that there be some consideration to age-appropriate materials.
Why do we have G, PG and R rated movies? It is so that some content is restricted from children.
I use common sense media a lot to determine what I wanted DC to see and not see based on age appropriate psychosocial development. I feel like most good parents do this.

Nope. Many students do NOT have access to
Free books. Many students don’t have parents who will take them to a library or have the technology to read digitally.
They need to be available for all students. Removing books students previously had access to is banning. Plain and simple.

You want gay porn in schools because of poor people? Come on man.

It’s not gay porn. Look up the definition of porn FFS. And who cares if a book has gay characters?

I don't care about gay characters but pretending Genderqueer doesn't contain porn is simply crazy.

Tell us again what you think the porn is. Because every time this book comes up, not a one of you has read the book and it shows.

We've all seen screen shots of the porn it contains.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is a Venn diagram here of distrust of librarians and general misogyny.

The better diagram is people with education degrees and leftist activism.

God, I hope so. Your kids need our support. Your gay ones, your depressed ones, your kids in need of medication, hungry kids, ALL OF THEM.
Proud to be a leftist activist.

You want people who don't think like you sent to reeducation camp, don't you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many of you whining about these books in libraries allow your kids to have computers with the internet or allow them to have phones?

Because I'm LOL'ing at the pearl clutching over school libraries while not realized the entire universe of books, porn, chat rooms, dark web, etc. etc. your kids have access to. And can do so without you knowing.

So sit down. And leave the librarians alone. Worry about yourself.

So schools should have the same moral compass as pornhub. Got it.