There is a least one person out there who knows THEY were responsible for that bullet being in the gun. But I think highly unlikely they would be worth pursuing for financial justice. Lawsuits go for the deepest pockets.

Anonymous wrote:Article says he's selling off assets to shield them from lawsuits.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11251195/Alec-Baldwin-selling-29million-Hamptons-home-shield-assets-looming-legal-battles.html

He doesn't look well.

Makes sense. He's been in Amagansett and sort of part of the community for a really, really long time. From before it became the ridiculous "Hamptons" destination that it is now. Just up & going has to be for a reason.

If anything, this will do more for the film's box offer numbers

Anonymous wrote:Baldwin has settled with the cinematographer’s family.

I can’t believe they’re going to continue to shoot the movie. Who’s going to want to see it?

Uh, lots of people? Didn't lots go see that Brandon Lee movie after he died during shooting?

Baldwin has settled with the cinematographer’s family.

I can’t believe they’re going to continue to shoot the movie. Who’s going to want to see it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day if the bullet wasn't on the set, no one would've been in danger. Whoever allowed/brought a bullet to set should be held responsible. I highly doubt it was Baldwin.

+1

+2 no fan of the Baldwins but agree with this

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day if the bullet wasn't on the set, no one would've been in danger. Whoever allowed/brought a bullet to set should be held responsible. I highly doubt it was Baldwin.

+1

Anonymous wrote:At the end of the day if the bullet wasn't on the set, no one would've been in danger. Whoever allowed/brought a bullet to set should be held responsible. I highly doubt it was Baldwin.

ITA that Baldwin as actor isn’t the one responsible, but Baldwin as producer hired everyone including the armorer.

At the end of the day if the bullet wasn't on the set, no one would've been in danger. Whoever allowed/brought a bullet to set should be held responsible. I highly doubt it was Baldwin.

Anonymous wrote:I don't get how he's at fault, it's a tragic accident.

I suppose that's what the investigation was for.

Anonymous wrote:Article says he's selling off assets to shield them from lawsuits.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11251195/Alec-Baldwin-selling-29million-Hamptons-home-shield-assets-looming-legal-battles.html

He doesn't look well.

I don't think anyone would look well under his circumstances.

I don't get how he's at fault, it's a tragic accident.

Article says he's selling off assets to shield them from lawsuits.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11251195/Alec-Baldwin-selling-29million-Hamptons-home-shield-assets-looming-legal-battles.html

He doesn't look well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been reading that the victim’s husband is suing Alec & that Alec is now verbally absolving himself of any responsibility for what occurred.

I also read that he feels he is “protected” from being sued + that he even is going so far as to claim it was the victim’s fault that she got shot and thus killed. 😠

I do think that Armorer bears a lot of it. She had most of the responsibility, but as for safety there are also others that are responsible for that.

Like every lawsuit it will be settled. Apparently there will be no criminal charges.

The DA said today that they are considering criminal charges against 4 people, and specifically named Baldwin as possibly facing charges. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/alec-baldwin-may-soon-be-criminally-charged-in-rust-shooting-new-letter-shows/ar-AA12gZug

He's got a wrongful death suit from the widower and a totally separate defamation suit for allegedly defaming a woman as an "insurrectionist."

He needs to settle some suits and just tweeting or giving interviews.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been reading that the victim’s husband is suing Alec & that Alec is now verbally absolving himself of any responsibility for what occurred.

I also read that he feels he is “protected” from being sued + that he even is going so far as to claim it was the victim’s fault that she got shot and thus killed. 😠

I do think that Armorer bears a lot of it. She had most of the responsibility, but as for safety there are also others that are responsible for that.

Like every lawsuit it will be settled. Apparently there will be no criminal charges.

+1 It was clearly an accident but negligence demands compensation to the victims and safeguards reinforced in the future.