Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:48     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is there not more outrage!?


Because there is really nothing new in the final scenario.


The only change I see that is completely new is kicking the poor Brookfield kids out of Frankin.

Brookfield should be at Rocky Run. All of it.


+1
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:43     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The final scenario is basically a very minor revision of the revised scenarios.

Is Reid going to change anything when she makes a recommendation to the board in July?

I just want to be done with this.


Do you have ANY idea how tone-deaf you sound when being "done with this" means that South Lakes and Westfield are going to take major hits under this "final proposal"?

I mean, sure, I guess those wanting to know for sure if they are in or out of Skyview would like some certainty, but this is some truly rancid sausage being made here.


Tone-deaf?

Long time ago I ran the numbers and warned Westfield would lose 1,000 kids. People didn't believe me and didn't really care.

This is what I said back in October.

10/15/2025 12:24

I get that and some Oak Hill kids may well end up getting moved from Chantily to KAA.

But my question is this: what are you going to do if Westfield enrollment drops from 2700 to 1700?

So far, no one answered to this question.

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1590/1292559.page


Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:40     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think Westfield and South Lakes will be OK.

The enrollment number under the final scenario:

Centreville: 2,119
Westfield: 2,083
South Lakes: 2,033
Skyview: 1780


They are losing 800 students and what, 25% at least of their staff? These other schools are used to around those numbers, there won't be a huge change for them. Those other schools also didn't have a SB member plotting basically to screw them with moving only new low income areas to their school.


I dunno.

I feel like 2,000+ is still a good number for any high school. The staff can move to Skyview.


The staff can go to Skyview, sure. Thats not the issue. Its awful for the Westfield community to lose so many teachers and staff-its the youngest teachers who get destaffed first. And losing 900 students is nuts.


This is still a school year away. Westfield will lose some to retirements and other attrition. And, there is still new construction in the Westfield area.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:25     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think Westfield and South Lakes will be OK.

The enrollment number under the final scenario:

Centreville: 2,119
Westfield: 2,083
South Lakes: 2,033
Skyview: 1780


They are losing 800 students and what, 25% at least of their staff? These other schools are used to around those numbers, there won't be a huge change for them. Those other schools also didn't have a SB member plotting basically to screw them with moving only new low income areas to their school.


I dunno.

I feel like 2,000+ is still a good number for any high school. The staff can move to Skyview.


The staff can go to Skyview, sure. Thats not the issue. Its awful for the Westfield community to lose so many teachers and staff-its the youngest teachers who get destaffed first. And losing 900 students is nuts.


Chantilly is losing 600, so plenty of destaffing to go around
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:24     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think Westfield and South Lakes will be OK.

The enrollment number under the final scenario:

Centreville: 2,119
Westfield: 2,083
South Lakes: 2,033
Skyview: 1780


They are losing 800 students and what, 25% at least of their staff? These other schools are used to around those numbers, there won't be a huge change for them. Those other schools also didn't have a SB member plotting basically to screw them with moving only new low income areas to their school.


I dunno.

I feel like 2,000+ is still a good number for any high school. The staff can move to Skyview.


The staff can go to Skyview, sure. Thats not the issue. Its awful for the Westfield community to lose so many teachers and staff-its the youngest teachers who get destaffed first. And losing 900 students is nuts.


You understand that staffing is all formula driven right? It’s not like these teachers would be fired. Sure they’d have to go to a different school, but they have a job.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:16     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is there not more outrage!?


Because there is really nothing new in the final scenario.


The only change I see that is completely new is kicking the poor Brookfield kids out of Frankin.

Brookfield should be at Rocky Run. All of it.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:16     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think Westfield and South Lakes will be OK.

The enrollment number under the final scenario:

Centreville: 2,119
Westfield: 2,083
South Lakes: 2,033
Skyview: 1780


They are losing 800 students and what, 25% at least of their staff? These other schools are used to around those numbers, there won't be a huge change for them. Those other schools also didn't have a SB member plotting basically to screw them with moving only new low income areas to their school.


I dunno.

I feel like 2,000+ is still a good number for any high school. The staff can move to Skyview.


The staff can go to Skyview, sure. Thats not the issue. Its awful for the Westfield community to lose so many teachers and staff-its the youngest teachers who get destaffed first. And losing 900 students is nuts.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:14     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:Thats ridiculous. She is so out of touch and clueless.


Given how Reid operates, they'll spend shit tons of money expanding elementary schools in Herndon and then building a new Silver Line ES only for Reid to then get up on a soapbox again about making every middle school 6-8.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:14     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why is there not more outrage!?


Because there is really nothing new in the final scenario.


The only change I see that is completely new is kicking the poor Brookfield kids out of Frankin.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:13     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Thats ridiculous. She is so out of touch and clueless.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:12     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Rocky Run, the closest middle school to Stone, is only 16%. I think that's interesting.



It's also the middle school Kathy Smith's kids attended. What a coincidence!


It also had a beautiful renovation done, and is slated to have hundreds of empty seats after the boundary change.


Reid has alluded to wanting to move 6th graders to Rocky Run to fill some seats.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:11     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:The final scenario is basically a very minor revision of the revised scenarios.

Is Reid going to change anything when she makes a recommendation to the board in July?

I just want to be done with this.


Do you have ANY idea how tone-deaf you sound when being "done with this" means that South Lakes and Westfield are going to take major hits under this "final proposal"?

I mean, sure, I guess those wanting to know for sure if they are in or out of Skyview would like some certainty, but this is some truly rancid sausage being made here.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:10     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I actually think Westfield and South Lakes will be OK.

The enrollment number under the final scenario:

Centreville: 2,119
Westfield: 2,083
South Lakes: 2,033
Skyview: 1780


They are losing 800 students and what, 25% at least of their staff? These other schools are used to around those numbers, there won't be a huge change for them. Those other schools also didn't have a SB member plotting basically to screw them with moving only new low income areas to their school.


I dunno.

I feel like 2,000+ is still a good number for any high school. The staff can move to Skyview.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:07     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
Anonymous wrote:Why is there not more outrage!?


Because there is really nothing new in the final scenario.
Anonymous
Post 06/14/2026 19:06     Subject: FCPS Skyview Boundary Revised Scenario 1 / 2
The final scenario is basically a very minor revision of the revised scenarios.

Is Reid going to change anything when she makes a recommendation to the board in July?

I just want to be done with this.