Anonymous wrote:In other news, Visi beating SSSAS on the ISL side makes for a very interesting playoffs, as the top four have all lost to one or more of their counterparts. Final seeding and momentum will be important.

The top 4 are the top 4. Until last night Potomac and SSSAS were the presumed top seeds with home field advantage in the semis. Visi’s win, combined with a win against Potomac on Friday, would give Visi home field advantage in the semis along with SSSSS. Any one of the top 4 teams would be a tough matchup in the semis depending on who shows up that day, so home field advantage is key. The Friday Visi vs Potomac game will be a must win for both teams, and probably very high energy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In other news, Visi beating SSSAS on the ISL side makes for a very interesting playoffs, as the top four have all lost to one or more of their counterparts. Final seeding and momentum will be important.

If Visi beats Potomac, what are your guesses for top four rankings?

If Visi beats Pmac they will most likely be 1 and Saints will be 2 since Visi beat Saints. Then it will be Pmac 3 and SR 4 as Pmac beat SR a few weeks ago.

Anonymous wrote:In other news, Visi beating SSSAS on the ISL side makes for a very interesting playoffs, as the top four have all lost to one or more of their counterparts. Final seeding and momentum will be important.

If Visi beats Potomac, what are your guesses for top four rankings?

Anonymous wrote:Do St. John’s parents have nothing better to do than come on here and argue about youth sports? Pathetic.

HS Sports

In other news, Visi beating SSSAS on the ISL side makes for a very interesting playoffs, as the top four have all lost to one or more of their counterparts. Final seeding and momentum will be important.

GC won another WCAC game. End of story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC fans have been saying for years how they will challenge GC for the WCAC crown and haven't delivered. Must be tough to always come up second best.

And GC has been saying for months that it would dominate SJC last night - which didn’t happen. GC parents were shook when SJC started roaring back.

I can't imagine that's true. I've spoke with a bunch of GC parents this year and the one thing they all say is that they've been very inconsistent this year. High highs and lows lows. They sort of expect their girls to play down to weaker opponents.

Then you’re either oblivious or new to this forum - or both. Go back and re-read the arrogance in this thread from GC aimed at SJC back in March.

Believe it or not, most parents from these teams are not posting on this forum. So it is plausible that most parents feel the way the PP said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As someone who has no dog in the wcac fight, you all are a bunch of clowns

\

I have a dog in the fight and I agree this is a clown show. Let's stop this nonsense.

It was a surprisingly close game and hats off to SJC for a great effort. Still believe GC has more talent and should win the WCAC final in a couple weeks. Next season? It's 50-50.

Agree with this calm and rational post. I'm on SJC side of this and I can tell you that no one sensible at SJC ever said they would compete with GC this year. We were humbly hoping to keep it close and play hard. The GC reaction on this board to a competitive game has been telling and less than gracious. No idea where the antipathy to the coach comes from.

Rational assessment: GC is stronger and deeper--and is playing with double figures of Senior and Junior D1 commits They will be strongly favored again in the WCAC playoffs should both teams make the Championship game. Hopefully, next year and the year after will be more of a competitive matchup on paper, as well as on the field. Will have to see how the 2029 and 2030 classes pan out. In the meantime, SJC returns all starters next season, so we will see.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC fans have been saying for years how they will challenge GC for the WCAC crown and haven't delivered. Must be tough to always come up second best.

And GC has been saying for months that it would dominate SJC last night - which didn’t happen. GC parents were shook when SJC started roaring back.

I can't imagine that's true. I've spoke with a bunch of GC parents this year and the one thing they all say is that they've been very inconsistent this year. High highs and lows lows. They sort of expect their girls to play down to weaker opponents.

Then you’re either oblivious or new to this forum - or both. Go back and re-read the arrogance in this thread from GC aimed at SJC back in March.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know of a reason why GC and BI aren’t scheduled to play?

They played on April 11.
GC 17
BI 7

Thank you for that. For some reason, it is not on the schedule that GC posted on their IG, nor is it listed for either team's schedules on the WCAC or lax numbers websites.

It was missed by the ADs when they scheduled but figured out midseason. GC is no longer playing Glenelg because we were told it puts us over the game limit.

Thank you for providing the update without being a smartass it's rare on here, much appreciated. I do wish they would update the WCAC website that game could be the difference in who gets 3 and 4 between PVI and BI, who play tonight.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know of a reason why GC and BI aren’t scheduled to play?

They played on April 11.
GC 17
BI 7

Thank you for that. For some reason, it is not on the schedule that GC posted on their IG, nor is it listed for either team's schedules on the WCAC or lax numbers websites.

It was missed by the ADs when they scheduled but figured out midseason. GC is no longer playing Glenelg because we were told it puts us over the game limit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

Only 4 of the seniors (Marquette, High Point, Monmouth, and Denver) see consistent time and Denver commit just returned from an ACL tear; Bryant commit out with injury. The starting goalie is usually the 2027 not the seniors.

8 commits, not 9. The Winthrop commit listed on Insidelacrosse transferred junior year. They have 10 seniors, the other 2 are managers. But yes, all 10 played club and 2 are not playing in college. Counting and reading are hard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can only imagine how insufferable MH’s yelling was during tonight’s game, one he surely expected to dominate on home soil. Shows GC is vulnerable. This gives SJC a huge tailwind going into the post season. HF is a legit coach and she stared down her haters tonight - in a debut match v GC with inherited talent. WCAC playoffs are gonna be awesome.

Well he was not there. He’s very sick.

It was also senior night so some senior night lineups were out there.

ok, just stop with the senior night BS excuse. OLGC has 12 seniors listed on the roster; 10 of the 12 were club players, and 9 of those 12 are committed to play in college. 7 are going D1 they have 1 going D2 and one D3... 1 of the senior commits is injured and did not play.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC fans have been saying for years how they will challenge GC for the WCAC crown and haven't delivered. Must be tough to always come up second best.

And GC has been saying for months that it would dominate SJC last night - which didn’t happen. GC parents were shook when SJC started roaring back.

I can't imagine that's true. I've spoke with a bunch of GC parents this year and the one thing they all say is that they've been very inconsistent this year. High highs and lows lows. They sort of expect their girls to play down to weaker opponents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know of a reason why GC and BI aren’t scheduled to play?

They played on April 11.
GC 17
BI 7

Thank you for that. For some reason, it is not on the schedule that GC posted on their IG, nor is it listed for either team's schedules on the WCAC or lax numbers websites.