Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The IB parents who would like to go to Hardy, all the feeder elementaries, should start a group and meet frequently and come up with a proposal, and approach the principal and DCPS. It is ridiculous if the school is not serving the IB community. DCPS cannot build another school, but the existing school needs to make en effort to have all the IB families go, that should be a school's priority.
IB parents were doing that when my oldest started at a Hardy feeder in 2004 and they're doing it now. It didn't work then, it's not working yet now.
Anonymous wrote:The IB parents who would like to go to Hardy, all the feeder elementaries, should start a group and meet frequently and come up with a proposal, and approach the principal and DCPS. It is ridiculous if the school is not serving the IB community. DCPS cannot build another school, but the existing school needs to make en effort to have all the IB families go, that should be a school's priority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How bad is Hardy really? If I'm not a racist and am OK with uniforms, wouldn't my kid get something good out of the smaller setting? Wilson seems like such a clamorous echo chamber.
Hardy would be great for your kid - as it was for mine - and will prepare him or her extremely well for Wilson - just like it did for mine.
It may prepare students adequately for DCPS. While there are many exceptions, of course, in general there is a discernible difference academically at Wilson between those students who went to Deal and those who went to Hardy.
Exactly . Keeping all things equal, i.e. taking students with the same SES, 9th grade math teachers at Wilson know that students from Hardy come with a stronger math background.
Quite the opposite. It's not just an academic difference. Many of the Wilson discipline problem students came out of Hardy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I feel like Eaton parents had been sold a story about Hardy turning around, but it seems like unless the Principal wants to make that happen, it just won't happen. Oh well.
Here is an Eaton family who will be lotterying out this year in an attempt at a Deal feeder.
John Eaton was royally screwed in the whole school reassignment process. Mr Frumin, the ward 3 rep on the boundary advisory committee, conceded (or is "dismissed" a better word?) Eaton students as the "collateral damage" in the whole process.
Honest question.
How do you fix deal overcrowding in a way that does not cut down on the number of feeders? Or do Eaton families want Deal expanded?
Signed, parent living IB for Hardy who can't afford vacations or extras because of private school tuition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the city is going to build a small school just to cater to IB families who don't want to go to school with OOB families? That is a crazy idea!
No, they just don't want to go to a mediocre middle school which lags far behind the other DC middle school WOTP. Hardy may be a welcome life boat for those whose local middle schools are much worse, but it seems like a distant also-ran compared to Alice Deal.
and compared to Latin and compare to BASIS.
It's not easy getting a spot at Latin or Basis these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I feel like Eaton parents had been sold a story about Hardy turning around, but it seems like unless the Principal wants to make that happen, it just won't happen. Oh well.
Here is an Eaton family who will be lotterying out this year in an attempt at a Deal feeder.
John Eaton was royally screwed in the whole school reassignment process. Mr Frumin, the ward 3 rep on the boundary advisory committee, conceded (or is "dismissed" a better word?) Eaton students as the "collateral damage" in the whole process.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the city is going to build a small school just to cater to IB families who don't want to go to school with OOB families? That is a crazy idea!
We proposed reducing enrollment at Hardy so that it could reach majority IB enrollment quickly, but that was a crazy idea as well.
The abbreviated version of this thread: Any proposal that results in a majority IB school for the families zoned for Hardy in the next few years is a crazy idea.
It seems that the OOB community rejects getting rid of the uniforms as symbolic pandering to attract more IB families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, the principal should go door-to-door and get down on one knee and beg the IB families to enroll.Anonymous wrote:The IB parents who would like to go to Hardy, all the feeder elementaries, should start a group and meet frequently and come up with a proposal, and approach the principal and DCPS. It is ridiculous if the school is not serving the IB community. DCPS cannot build another school, but the existing school needs to make en effort to have all the IB families go, that should be a school's priority.
Don't worry. That ship has sailed. The principal didn't even both showing up for the Hardy info session at Mann this year. The OOB spots are safe.
Except for a token few, IB kids will keep going to privates or to charters like Latin and BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the city is going to build a small school just to cater to IB families who don't want to go to school with OOB families? That is a crazy idea!
No, they just don't want to go to a mediocre middle school which lags far behind the other DC middle school WOTP. Hardy may be a welcome life boat for those whose local middle schools are much worse, but it seems like a distant also-ran compared to Alice Deal.
and compared to Latin and compare to BASIS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the city is going to build a small school just to cater to IB families who don't want to go to school with OOB families? That is a crazy idea!
No, they just don't want to go to a mediocre middle school which lags far behind the other DC middle school WOTP. Hardy may be a welcome life boat for those whose local middle schools are much worse, but it seems like a distant also-ran compared to Alice Deal.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, the principal should go door-to-door and get down on one knee and beg the IB families to enroll.Anonymous wrote:The IB parents who would like to go to Hardy, all the feeder elementaries, should start a group and meet frequently and come up with a proposal, and approach the principal and DCPS. It is ridiculous if the school is not serving the IB community. DCPS cannot build another school, but the existing school needs to make en effort to have all the IB families go, that should be a school's priority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How bad is Hardy really? If I'm not a racist and am OK with uniforms, wouldn't my kid get something good out of the smaller setting? Wilson seems like such a clamorous echo chamber.
Hardy would be great for your kid - as it was for mine - and will prepare him or her extremely well for Wilson - just like it did for mine.
It may prepare students adequately for DCPS. While there are many exceptions, of course, in general there is a discernible difference academically at Wilson between those students who went to Deal and those who went to Hardy.
Exactly . Keeping all things equal, i.e. taking students with the same SES, 9th grade math teachers at Wilson know that students from Hardy come with a stronger math background.
Anonymous wrote:It would only exacerbate Wilson overcrowding, you can't build another middle school wotp.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So the city is going to build a small school just to cater to IB families who don't want to go to school with OOB families? That is a crazy idea!
We proposed reducing enrollment at Hardy so that it could reach majority IB enrollment quickly, but that was a crazy idea as well.
The abbreviated version of this thread: Any proposal that results in a majority IB school for the families zoned for Hardy in the next few years is a crazy idea.