Anonymous wrote:We have tr remember that the main reason alarm bells were ringing about Flynn was because he was working for or getting paid by foreign governments (Turkey to kidnap a US resident, Saudi Arabia to sell nuclear secrets, Israel to undermine the US at the UN). Even Chris Christie thought he was completely unsuitable for NSA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

He lied about our national security. His lies effect us all.

No, he didn't. Not even close.

He lied to Pence about national security. Yes, he did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Maybe not against the rules. Maybe it is. That is up to the appeals court to determine.

WapPo in article today:
"A federal judge doesn’t typically hire private counsel to respond to an appeals court"

He is essentially a participant in this case now. Perhaps it's time for a new judge.

A federal judge usually isn't asked to provide an argument in person by a partisan and unqualified judicial appointee like Judge Rao.

"Partisan and unqualified?" LOL
There were two other judges, pal. And, they seem to think there is something to the brief that was filed.

And, a federal judge usually doesn't object to dropping a case when both sides agree that is what needs to be done.

The case isn't ripe for the action taken. Flynn made the plea and is thus guilty of the crime. He needs to serve the time. DOJ had NO business intervening at this juncture, and particularly with a flawed document with no new facts, mis-signed by an attorney who isn't even at the DOJ anymore.

There is plenty of evidence that the case should have never begun.
Did you read the article by Eli Lake?
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/articles/eli-lake/michael-flynn-gets-railroaded-by-the-fbi/

Anonymous wrote:

The case isn't ripe for the action taken. Flynn made the plea and is thus guilty of the crime. He needs to serve the time. DOJ had NO business intervening at this juncture, and particularly with a flawed document with no new facts, mis-signed by an attorney who isn't even at the DOJ anymore.

Go read the filings to dismiss from Flynn and DOJ. Please note that both filings include documentation. Exculpatory information was withheld. There was misconduct on the part of the investigators and the prosecution. Both reasons for dismissal. Again, there are real documents included in the filings which support dismissal.

Anonymous wrote:Fatso Barr is satan. Putin must have something inane to blackmail Barr. All these people like Pompeo, Barr, trump, Tara Reade are Russian asserts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

The bigger story is DOJ's lawless flip flop.

This isn't a policy flip flop like DOMA or churches. It's a flip flop on crime by a president's associate.

Disgusting.

So, if you were framed and threatened you need to go to jail? Got it.

Anonymous wrote:I hope you Gullible Guses don't have kids.

He was very convincing so he couldn't have been lying!!

Really? Can you hear yourself?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

The bigger story is DOJ's lawless flip flop.

This isn't a policy flip flop like DOMA or churches. It's a flip flop on crime by a president's associate.

Disgusting.

So, if you were framed and threatened you need to go to jail? Got it.

He wasn't framed. He lied to Pence and Spicer. Why do you think he didn't also lie to the FBI?

You like lawlessness. SMH

More telling, Strzok and Pientka did not detect any of the body language or ticks associated with lying. Considering that Pientka had attended a briefing with Flynn during the campaign in order to assess Flynn’s baseline mannerisms, this assessment has credibility. Comey, on his 2018 book tour, would later deny that the agents had thought Flynn was being truthful. But transcripts show that when asked under oath in the closed session with the House Intelligence Committee if Flynn lied to his agents, Comey said, “I don’t know. I think there is an argument to be made that he lied. It is a close one.”

The FBI’s official record of that interview, known as a 302, also discredits Comey’s after-the-fact spin. It shows that Flynn said he did not remember details when asked by the FBI agents. When prompted if he had asked Kislyak not to engage in a “tit for tat,” Flynn responded that he didn’t remember. Shea, in his motion, writes that “the statements in question were not by their nature easily falsifiable. In his interview, Mr. Flynn offered either equivocal (‘I don’t know’) or indirect responses, or claimed to not remember the matter in question.”

The 302 record also shows that Comey’s initial justification to Congress in March for the interview was misleading. “My judgment,” he said, “was we could not close the investigation of Mr. Flynn without asking him what is the deal” with the “disconnect” between what he told Kislyak and what he told Pence. But the agents never asked Flynn direct questions about his conversation with Pence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

He lied about our national security. His lies effect us all.

No, he didn't. Not even close.

He lied to Pence about national security. Yes, he did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

The bigger story is DOJ's lawless flip flop.

This isn't a policy flip flop like DOMA or churches. It's a flip flop on crime by a president's associate.

Disgusting.

So, if you were framed and threatened you need to go to jail? Got it.

He wasn't framed. He lied to Pence and Spicer. Why do you think he didn't also lie to the FBI?

You like lawlessness. SMH

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

The bigger story is DOJ's lawless flip flop.

This isn't a policy flip flop like DOMA or churches. It's a flip flop on crime by a president's associate.

Disgusting.

So, if you were framed and threatened you need to go to jail? Got it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not exactly the crime of the century. OMG he lied! Only partisan hacks care.

The bigger story is DOJ's lawless flip flop.

This isn't a policy flip flop like DOMA or churches. It's a flip flop on crime by a president's associate.

Disgusting.