Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quick reminder:
When referring to Trump’s demands in Ukraine, please remember to put “investigation” in proper quotes. It also helps to hyphenate it, “manufactured-investigation”.
Every time it’s incorrectly identified, it legitimizes it, and you allow black propaganda to win.
Don’t let the commies win.

Call it what you want.
Patience, grasshopper. You will find out in due time that the investigation is real.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Quick reminder:
When referring to Trump’s demands in Ukraine, please remember to put “investigation” in proper quotes. It also helps to hyphenate it, “manufactured-investigation”.
Every time it’s incorrectly identified, it legitimizes it, and you allow black propaganda to win.
Don’t let the commies win.

Call it what you want.
Patience, grasshopper. You will find out in due time that the investigation is real.

Anonymous wrote:Quick reminder:
When referring to Trump’s demands in Ukraine, please remember to put “investigation” in proper quotes. It also helps to hyphenate it, “manufactured-investigation”.
Every time it’s incorrectly identified, it legitimizes it, and you allow black propaganda to win.
Don’t let the commies win.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Yes, and the senate GOP at this time will vote no, and the investigation will die.

And Dems of course will blame Putin for it, and ask for a new Mueller investigation

It has turned out that the entire GOP is just a Moscow subsidiary. So yeah, Putin is pulling your silly little strings. If you partake of right wing media, those talking Poudre indeed birthed in Russia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Yes, and the senate GOP at this time will vote no, and the investigation will die.

And Dems of course will blame Putin for it, and ask for a new Mueller investigation

It has turned out that the entire GOP is just a Moscow subsidiary. So yeah, Putin is pulling your silly little strings. If you partake of right wing media, those talking Poudre indeed birthed in Russia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Yes, and the senate GOP at this time will vote no, and the investigation will die.

And Dems of course will blame Putin for it, and ask for a new Mueller investigation

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it is ok in present day U.S. to blackmail other countries if they want to have the U.S. for an ally? Another plus for the U.S. ethical behavior now and in the past!

Cite your evidence of "blackmail."

Dp- blackmail is a misnomer. It’s extortion.

Cite your evidence of extortion.

The transcript of the phone call. JFC you a$$holes would deny the sky is blue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Yes, and the senate GOP at this time will vote no, and the investigation will die.

And Dems of course will blame Putin for it, and ask for a new Mueller investigation

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Yes, and the senate GOP at this time will vote no, and the investigation will die.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why doesn't Pelosi just hold a vote on the impeachment inquiry and call the administration's bluff?

That takes away their last remaining argument against complying with subpoenas.

Or am I missing something?

I think he is hoping they will do this now without Republican votes and it will go to McConnell’s senate to die. I think Pelosi is hoping more Republicans will eventually join in defending the Constitution

I think this is incorrect because the vote is to formally launch the impeachment investigation in the House. This vote is only held in the House. When the articles of impeachment are passed then both houses vote on that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Title of Nobility Clause is a provision in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution, that prohibits the federal government from granting titles of nobility, and restricts members of the government from receiving gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies without the consent of the United States Congress.

So, Trump has every right to ask for foreign leaders to investigate others in exchange for something in return as long as he gets congress to approve it first. Else he’s violating the constitution (ie breaking the law) and is subject to impeachment. Fairly simple. Trump did not ask Congress, and honestly repeatedly does not ask them for permission. He is simply exceeding his rights under our three branch system of government and needs to be removed, regardless of whether or not you agree or disagree with his policies or are Republican, Democrat, or independent. There is no arguing this point, although I am sure he will try.

A proper investigation is conducted by the FBI, which has agreements with other countries to engage in investigations. Directing it from the White House, with the DOJ, Dept of Treasury, the GAO, NSC, DNI, etc involved, but spearheaded by a Presidential Agent (Giuliani) who is compensated by Oligarchs, is NOT the way to do it.

"Proper" = led by insiders, often Democrats and corrupt.

In other words you are claiming that only Republicans can investigate Republicans and only Democrats can investigate Democrats. Okay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Devin Nunes on impeachment. “If a president just randomly was parachuting his personal attorney down into countries where he thot he could get some dirt on political opponents..that might be questionable..That’s not what this is."

Devin, that is exactly what this is. Sheesh.

The countries aren't random and they aren't parachuting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So it is ok in present day U.S. to blackmail other countries if they want to have the U.S. for an ally? Another plus for the U.S. ethical behavior now and in the past!

It’s ok to extort other countries at the behest of RUSSIA.
This is all about doing what Putin wants.