Anonymous wrote:This is a spammer. Can he be blcked please?

Once again, just don't engage with them. They are pathetic losers with nothing better to do with their lives. If anything posting over them as though they don't exist is what pisses them off the most anyways. 😉

Anonymous wrote:This is a spammer. Can he be blcked please?

Still driving in the car with a chin diaper and gloves eh lol

This is a spammer. Can he be blcked please?

Anonymous wrote:This is probably the easiest part of the schedule for the high school aged teams, so it doesn't get any easier from here.

10s - what is going on here? how is Skyline the top VA GA team?

09s & 08s - think this was expected, VRSC at the top followed by SYC then Skyline and TSJ

07/06s - this is the one TSJ team that stayed largely together, so not a surprise they're the top for VA GA.

In short, VRSC has provided no meaningful, substantial, quantifiable growth in any metric despite all the money, resources, talk, and booze. Interesting…

This is probably the easiest part of the schedule for the high school aged teams, so it doesn't get any easier from here.

10s - what is going on here? how is Skyline the top VA GA team?

09s & 08s - think this was expected, VRSC at the top followed by SYC then Skyline and TSJ

07/06s - this is the one TSJ team that stayed largely together, so not a surprise they're the top for VA GA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is it about having a big kid without using left foot is good?

Your question is horribly worded. I assume you are taking a dig at a particular child/team. Maybe your kid should be better?

If you are trying, very poorly, to say someone should need to use both feet to be a good player, that simply isn't true. Arjen Robben, Mo Salah (his left actually isn't terrible but he avoids using it), Kaoru Mitoma, Andy Robertson, and Hakim Ziyech are SOME players who get/got paid a lot of money to play one footed.

"Lol they are professionals though, I'm talking about youth soccer where we need academies." PP, I know you won't actually say something like the previous sentence as your post was borderline incomprehensible.

How empty is your life posting here at 5 in the morning? One too many beverages at the club’s bar? 1Fam

Anonymous wrote:What is it about having a big kid without using left foot is good?

Your question is horribly worded. I assume you are taking a dig at a particular child/team. Maybe your kid should be better?

If you are trying, very poorly, to say someone should need to use both feet to be a good player, that simply isn't true. Arjen Robben, Mo Salah (his left actually isn't terrible but he avoids using it), Kaoru Mitoma, Andy Robertson, and Hakim Ziyech are SOME players who get/got paid a lot of money to play one footed.

"Lol they are professionals though, I'm talking about youth soccer where we need academies." PP, I know you won't actually say something like the previous sentence as your post was borderline incomprehensible.

What is it about having a big kid without using left foot is good?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Why are you rostering for next year this year?

Because VRSC is now Loudoun Soccer 2.0
That mortgage ain’t gonna pay itself now, is it?

Maybe you should actually read the previous posts for context, dumb ass.

You only have a large roster at U12 unless the team is playing U13 teams the entire seaso , otherwise, you keep the roster small.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Why are you rostering for next year this year?

Because VRSC is now Loudoun Soccer 2.0
That mortgage ain’t gonna pay itself now, is it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Why are you rostering for next year this year?

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

Unfortunately, this has been a byproduct of the FCV influx. Current VRSC parent here - and we know many girls that:

1) used to be on the VRSC top team, and left because they received an offer for VRSC lower team (bc top team was now majority FCV)
2) used to be on the FCV top team, and didn't join because they received an offer for VRSC lower team

Growing pain for year 1. The 9v9 teams (2013 and 2014) both have 3 teams. Our team has 13 players...not sure of the count for the others but going with it....3 teams * 13 players = 39 girls. Gives Rev room to have 18 players on both GA1 and GA2 for 11v11

Maybe it is just more "VRSC speak" but they have stated numerous times that they don't want to be the next Loudoun Soccer with 5-6 teams per age group (lol - then look they have 5 2014B teams) - and want to keep the club capped around 60 teams. Quick count shows there are 50 teams today.

My kid gets more play time with the smaller roster. There's also more opportunity to play up / down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Spoken like a coach trying to justify having such large teams, i don't think any parent would see it that way, since less players = more playing time and playing 11v11 tournaments would mean only adding 1~3 players for a weekend vs carrying 1~3 extra players for an entire year.

Look at EDP for U13. There are U12 teams playing.

move the goal posts some more...now you're brining up U12 teams that are playing 11v11 that is not the same as U12 teams playing 9v9 with a 15 player roster...GTFOH

Yes it it. Good U12 team will play their regular leagues as well as EDP as a U13 and 11v11 tournaments in addition to 9v9 tournaments

i can't tell if you're trolling or you're dead serious...you just keep moving the goal posts - obviously if a U12 team is playing in an 11v11 league, then yes they'll need 15 players on their roster but that is not the same as a U12 team that only plays 9v9 competitions

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Spoken like a coach trying to justify having such large teams, i don't think any parent would see it that way, since less players = more playing time and playing 11v11 tournaments would mean only adding 1~3 players for a weekend vs carrying 1~3 extra players for an entire year.

Look at EDP for U13. There are U12 teams playing.

move the goal posts some more...now you're brining up U12 teams that are playing 11v11 that is not the same as U12 teams playing 9v9 with a 15 player roster...GTFOH

Yes it it. Good U12 team will play their regular leagues as well as EDP as a U13 and 11v11 tournaments in addition to 9v9 tournaments

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is it common practice at Rev to not carry large teams? I see other clubs with stacked benches and most Revolution teams have half as many.

What do you consider a large team?

Rev has a standard 2-3 bench players vs 4-6 for the teams we've played in 9v9 from what I've seen this season.

Why do you want 6 bench players for 9v9? that basically means the entire team plays 1/2 the game and it's a massive line change

Because 9v9 turns into 11v11 and a 6 player bench turns into 4. The good u12 9v9 teams are already playing in 11v11 tournaments and some are playing in 11v11 leagues as well

Spoken like a coach trying to justify having such large teams, i don't think any parent would see it that way, since less players = more playing time and playing 11v11 tournaments would mean only adding 1~3 players for a weekend vs carrying 1~3 extra players for an entire year.

Look at EDP for U13. There are U12 teams playing.

move the goal posts some more...now you're brining up U12 teams that are playing 11v11 that is not the same as U12 teams playing 9v9 with a 15 player roster...GTFOH