Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is completely crazy.
Funding for federal employees has nothing to do with immigration.
Wall, border security, DACA, TPS, immigration judges etc etc. is about immigration. So, this government shutdown is truly a hostage situation.
McConnell must open the government and then Democrats and Republicans can debate merit of both sides views and proposals on immigration. It would actually be a negotiation only then.
Exactly.
McConnell IS NOT GOING TO HOLD THE VOTE, PEOPLE. Dems need another plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is so strange this issue is framed as a stand off between two sides who need to compromise when only one of those sides is actually demanding anything and the other has already voted to reopen the government with no strings attached.
Because the Dems won’t bring up debate on border wall unless forced to. Dems never compromise.
BS. They compromise all the time. So do Republicans. It's gotten harder for both sides, but it does happen from time to time. It happened last month until Trump blew it up.
Gridlock in Washington is what Trump was elected to fix. All he's done is make it worse.
Anonymous wrote:BOTH sides have to compromise.
Anonymous wrote:BOTH sides have to compromise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
At this point it is mostly open - they just aren’t paying the people they are recalling to work and of course they are making them work without support staff. Agency after agency has been asked to recall workers in response to pressure from lobbyists and in the interest of minimizinged the pain to people who might vote.
Agencies without powerful/ wealthy allies (EPA, Smithsonian, regulatory agencies) are likely to stay closed for as long as the shutdown continues. So for example, the IRS has recalled 46,000 workers to help process refunds but the workers who scrutinize dodgy returns are still furloughed
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/18/685829213/attempts-to-make-shutdown-painless-may-stretch-limits-of-federal-law
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/policy/finance/426123-dems-lash-out-at-trump-for-recalling-furloughed-workers%3famp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
At this point it is mostly open - they just aren’t paying the people they are recalling to work and of course they are making them work without support staff. Agency after agency has been asked to recall workers in response to pressure from lobbyists and in the interest of minimizinged the pain to people who might vote.
Agencies without powerful/ wealthy allies (EPA, Smithsonian, regulatory agencies) are likely to stay closed for as long as the shutdown continues. So for example, the IRS has recalled 46,000 workers to help process refunds but the workers who scrutinize dodgy returns are still furloughed
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/18/685829213/attempts-to-make-shutdown-painless-may-stretch-limits-of-federal-law
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/policy/finance/426123-dems-lash-out-at-trump-for-recalling-furloughed-workers%3famp
Anonymous wrote:THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
THE GOVERNMENT MUST BE OPENED
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is completely crazy.
Funding for federal employees has nothing to do with immigration.
Wall, border security, DACA, TPS, immigration judges etc etc. is about immigration. So, this government shutdown is truly a hostage situation.
McConnell must open the government and then Democrats and Republicans can debate merit of both sides views and proposals on immigration. It would actually be a negotiation only then.
Exactly.
Why do Democrats have to be the "reasonable" ones? Pelosi is not going to negotiate with the hostage takers. She has her caucus under control. Does McConnell?
McConnell IS NOT GOING TO HOLD THE VOTE, PEOPLE. Dems need another plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is completely crazy.
Funding for federal employees has nothing to do with immigration.
Wall, border security, DACA, TPS, immigration judges etc etc. is about immigration. So, this government shutdown is truly a hostage situation.
McConnell must open the government and then Democrats and Republicans can debate merit of both sides views and proposals on immigration. It would actually be a negotiation only then.
Exactly.
McConnell IS NOT GOING TO HOLD THE VOTE, PEOPLE. Dems need another plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is completely crazy.
Funding for federal employees has nothing to do with immigration.
Wall, border security, DACA, TPS, immigration judges etc etc. is about immigration. So, this government shutdown is truly a hostage situation.
McConnell must open the government and then Democrats and Republicans can debate merit of both sides views and proposals on immigration. It would actually be a negotiation only then.
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:This is completely crazy.
Funding for federal employees has nothing to do with immigration.
Wall, border security, DACA, TPS, immigration judges etc etc. is about immigration. So, this government shutdown is truly a hostage situation.
McConnell must open the government and then Democrats and Republicans can debate merit of both sides views and proposals on immigration. It would actually be a negotiation only then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Democrats were proposing $563 million to hire 75 more immigration judges, who currently face large backlogs processing"
That's $7,500,000 for each judge.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2019/01/19/us/politics/ap-us-government-shutdown.html
*sigh*
I’m going to let you think about that math a little longer.
That's TRUMP's proposal
https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2019/01/19/us/politics/19reuters-usa-shutdown-trump-offer-factbox.html
Burn. And don't forget the $805 million for drug sniffing dogs.
I don’t understand why Dems wouldn’t even look at Trump’s offered deal. I’m sure there are Dems who would vote for that.