Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
People like you are why I left the Catholic Church.
Bless your heart, you never left the Catholic Church. Will pray for you dear.
St James Church in Setauket NY would disagree with you.
Hate the sin but love the sinner. God’s mercy is always there for you.
Roe is trashed. “There is no constitutional right to abortion” is the law of the land.DD
And yet the abortions will continue on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.
We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.
We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.
We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.
We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.
We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.
These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.
They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.
Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.
No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.
And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.
If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.
As much as you want it to be true.... NOT ONE of the Justices lied to Congress.
And, if you want to talk about prosecuting lying to Congress.... let's start with Brennan and Clapper.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-john-brennan-lied-senate
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-11-17/lawmakers-resume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges
Even when faced with clear evidence that these 5 justices lied right to our faces, Republicans will deny it. Republicans can't stop their pathological lying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
People like you are why I left the Catholic Church.
Bless your heart, you never left the Catholic Church. Will pray for you dear.
St James Church in Setauket NY would disagree with you.
Hate the sin but love the sinner. God’s mercy is always there for you.
Roe is trashed. “There is no constitutional right to abortion” is the law of the land.DD
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
People like you are why I left the Catholic Church.
Bless your heart, you never left the Catholic Church. Will pray for you dear.
St James Church in Setauket NY would disagree with you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
People like you are why I left the Catholic Church.
Bless your heart, you never left the Catholic Church. Will pray for you dear.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
People like you are why I left the Catholic Church.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.
I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.
Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?
It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?
Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.
I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.
Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?
It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?
Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SCOTUS does not need to be packed. It needs to be cleaned and corrected.
We now know that Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett LIED under oath. They willfully and deliberately deceived and misled Congress during their SCOTUS nomination hearings. Thus their confirmations were ILLEGITIMATE.
We have 5 ILLEGITIMATE people taking seats on the SCOTUS bench.
We need to hear from Roberts what he intends to do about it.
We need the Senate to begin impeachment hearings. Clinton was impeached for far less.
We need their perjury cases to be referred to DoJ for prosecution.
These 5 people lack the integrity to sit on the SCOTUS bench and must be removed.
They all lied. They all committed perjury. They all gained their seats under false pretenses. They are ILLEGITIMATE and must be removed.
Ugh. Can we get some realistic proposals? I see everyone is still at the denial stage of grief.
No. It needs to be done. Again, Clinton *was* impeached for less.
And, lying to Congress is a crime. United States Code, Title 18, section 1001, and it has been used on Rod Blagojevich, Jeffrey Skilling and many others. There is no legitimate reason why it can't or shouldn't be prosecuted.
If Republicans get upset about it they void and completely destroy their "law and order" cred.
As much as you want it to be true.... NOT ONE of the Justices lied to Congress.
And, if you want to talk about prosecuting lying to Congress.... let's start with Brennan and Clapper.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-john-brennan-lied-senate
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-11-17/lawmakers-resume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.
I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.
Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?
It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda? [/
quote]
Agreed! Mississippi and Alabama have been killing poor black women since the 1600s. It’s what the majority of the people in these states want and have always wanted. The federal government should not be involved in preventing that in any way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.
I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.
Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?
It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hideous anti-Catholic bigotry on display. Grotesque. We will never be pushed around again—never again.
It was probably a catholic that did it. If you don't know how many catholics are angry about this decision, you are not paying attention.
Yeah sure. The old canard of Catholics being behind anti-Catholic vandalism; a debunked and widely discredited and pernicious stereotype that is itself a form of anti-Catholicism. Such vile bigotry must be condemned.
Lots of catholics are pissed off. Deal with it.
I’m sure you blame Jews when temples are vandalized. Deal with it.
Hard to be upset about graffiti when women's lives are going to be destroyed. Where's your anger and horror about all the misery these new extremist laws are going to unleash on American women and their families?
It’s called “democracy” remember? Where the people’s representatives vote on laws based on the will of the voters. I’m told democracy is sacred—apparently that’s only when the left wants to use it for propaganda?