Anonymous wrote:So when they talk about "multiple criteria"
How important are the test scores in determining eligibility for full-time AAP (level IV) center placement?
Test scores are just one piece of data considered when a file is reviewed for full-time AAP (level IV) center placement. The Level IV Center Central Selection Committee, made up of FCPS teachers, specialists, and administrators, considers multiple criteria, including: the Gifted Behaviors Rating Scale (GBRS), ability and achievement test scores, work samples, student progress reports, and other optional information such as the Parent/Guardian Questionnaire (available at http://www.fcps.edu/is/aap/forms.shtml).
Anonymous wrote:If u have high CogAT and NNAT and low GbRS, WISC may not help. The committee will want to see a reason for low GBRS, not another high test score. Examples for a low GBRS would be a LD, a vision issue, a hearing issue, a social issue, etc. You get the idea, there us a reason for such. This is what I have heard through the grape vine, anyway. I have no experience with appeals, personally. Good luck!
Anonymous wrote:oh, you're going to stop after 2nd grade? Or will you be there pushing the system to let them into TJ? Then doing their college applications and arguing with the admissions board? When does it stop?
Anonymous wrote:Similar situation here: September birthday, 99% NNAT, 84% FxAT, GBRS unknown... What are our chances?
Anonymous wrote:Similar situation here: September birthday, 99% NNAT, 84% FxAT, GBRS unknown... What are our chances?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else - trolls excluded - start to worry that we're not teaching our DCs to be responsible for their own future if we keep fighting the system for them?
Anonymous wrote:Wow! It just seems so subjective. Look at the other thread. There are kids with scores WAY below 139 that got in on the first round on a parent referral because the teacher and AART wrote a good GBRS. So a kid with a perfect score on one of the tests and a 132 on the WISC wouldn't make it? Bizarre to me. That kid is objectively in the top 2% where as the referral kid is in the top because of the "subjective" opinion of the teacher and the AART. It seems like a process in which the schools can really play favorites.