Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's amazing that politicians are defending him. Would they also have defended him if he had raped them?
Raped? You need to stop being outrageous. Not a word to make light of.
I don't think this person is "making light of" rape. In addition, Josh was 4 years old, what he did would be considered rape.
By who?
Sorry, hit send without reading.... Should have said "In addition, if Josh was 18 years old, what he did could be considered rape."
The Duggars are not child molesters. They do not promote child molestation. Their minor son touched their minor daughters. They were horrified and upset and handled the terrible situation in an appropriate manner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JFC people posting Quiverful documents:
There is no evidence that the Duggars handled this issue per those documents.
You have no idea what happened in their household and/or exactly how they handled the situation.
So, yes, this is a smear campaign.
The Duggars are part of ATI/Gothard. That is the ONLY curriculum that is allowed. Also the Duggars have stated exactly how they handled this situation. Try to keep up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Welcome to America, where the kardashians and their sex tapes are revered and the Duggar family is ripped to shreds.
1) Not everyone in "America" enjoys the Kardashian Self Promotion Project.
2) There is a difference between making a sex tape and sexually abusing multiple younger family members.
3) There is also a difference between promoting a lifestyle that glorifies hedonistic materialism while also being a materialistic hedonist and glorifying a lifestyle that promotes conservative morality while also being a child molester.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you again Madame Chairperson.
Like talking to a brick wall. You are now at troll status for me, time to ignore you.
Yes, Ma'am. Sorry Ma'am. Whatever you say, Ma'am. Or should I call you the "thought control police." Keep up the good work on your smear campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the curriculum used by the Duggars, which has been posted several times:
4. Why did God let this happen?
Results of defrauding by:
Immodest dress
Indecent exposure
Being out from protection of our parents
Being with evil friends
aka, she was wearing a short skirt, she asked for it.
She was sleeping unattended on a couch. She was asking for for it.
She was in possession of a vagina. She totally asked for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the curriculum used by the Duggars, which has been posted several times:
4. Why did God let this happen?
Results of defrauding by:
Immodest dress
Indecent exposure
Being out from protection of our parents
Being with evil friends
aka, she was wearing a short skirt, she asked for it.
She was sleeping unattended on a couch. She was asking for for it.
Anonymous wrote:JFC people posting Quiverful documents:
There is no evidence that the Duggars handled this issue per those documents.
You have no idea what happened in their household and/or exactly how they handled the situation.
So, yes, this is a smear campaign.
Anonymous wrote:JFC people posting Quiverful documents:
There is no evidence that the Duggars handled this issue per those documents.
You have no idea what happened in their household and/or exactly how they handled the situation.
So, yes, this is a smear campaign.
Anonymous wrote:JFC people posting Quiverful documents:
There is no evidence that the Duggars handled this issue per those documents.
You have no idea what happened in their household and/or exactly how they handled the situation.
So, yes, this is a smear campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the curriculum used by the Duggars, which has been posted several times:
4. Why did God let this happen?
Results of defrauding by:
Immodest dress
Indecent exposure
Being out from protection of our parents
Being with evil friends
aka, she was wearing a short skirt, she asked for it.
She was sleeping unattended on a couch. She was asking for for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP -- the Duggars are heartbroken this happened and they dealt with it in a dignified and responsible manner. the way they handled it allowed their family to survive. Josh has not re-offended. The sisters seem okay. Josh also survived and has a family of his own. What -- he should be thrown in jail for life? Killed? What?
What the heck is it that you all want from this family?
It is as if you are all saying - ha ha ha they are a bunch of idiots and deserve all this.
Bad stuff happens in the best of families.
This family handled it well.
Leave them alone.
They handled it well, huh? Seriously, all the discussion about religion and political involvement avoids the central question. If someone molested your daughter would you think it sufficient for that person to go work construction for a few months and get a stern talking to? If you separate out everything else and answer that question honestly I think you will see beyond the noise and understand what the furor is all about.
I would like to hear one supporter answer that question honestly.
Has any of the supporters answered this question yet?
I feel like people who try to say anything other than hateful things is called a "supporter." The rational conversation has been abandoned. The issue hasn't been discussed without name-calling or freaking out about their politics or religion. I say this as someone who is exactly the type of person a Duggar would rally against: independent, godless, liberal lesbian.