Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
Not true. Did you get your JD from the back of a cereal box?
DP. He's a convicted felon awaiting sentencing. He's not ABD, he's all the way. He pleaded guilty. Even if someone on Twitter said that somehow he's not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
Not true. Did you get your JD from the back of a cereal box?
OMG, you cannot be serious.
The guilty plea was entered and accepted. He is a convicted felon, awaiting sentencing.
Conviction is not considered to be complete until sentence is imposed by the Judge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
Not true. Did you get your JD from the back of a cereal box?
OMG, you cannot be serious.
The guilty plea was entered and accepted. He is a convicted felon, awaiting sentencing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
Not true. Did you get your JD from the back of a cereal box?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
Not true. Did you get your JD from the back of a cereal box?
Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything
Republican dipshit, if you plead guilty, you are convicted. ipso facto, dumbass.
He wasn't convicted of anything
Anonymous wrote:He wasn't convicted of anything and did/said nothing improper in the phone call. Original agents wanted to close investigation but were over ruled.
Anonymous wrote:^^^ You don't know what you are talking about.....
“Foreign governments are always interested in feeling out the incoming administration and it’s certainly not uncommon for representatives of the president-elect to have discussions with representatives of foreign powers just as an informational exercise to allow each side to get to know each other,” says David Clinton, chair of the political science department at Baylor University and co-author of Presidential Transitions and American Foreign Policy. “Such exchanges are part of modern day transitions.”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2017/01/michael-flynn-called-the-russians-is-this-normal.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
Agreed on the first point.
The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.
Agree.
News flash: if you talk to foreign agents, you’re being recorded. The Trump team was too stupid to know better. Flynn really baffles me. Not the traitor part, but the imbecility.
He was talking to representatives of other countries as part of his job as incoming Nat. Security Advisor.
Reports are that he told Kislyak not to elevate the situation after Obama expelled diplomats. Why is that a bad thing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
To our friends on the left: Two things can be true: 1) FBI had a product which named Flynn "openly." If this were leaked, it is illegal. 2) DNI unmasked lots of Obama administration that "unmasked" Flynn and many other Trump associates because they had obtained FISA warrants through false information--that means the warrants were obtained illegally.
Sad
Agreed on the first point.
The bolded is so hysterically misguided and false, I don't even know where to begin.