Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Is everyone convinced now that Trump is delusional because of his dementia? He had a manic episode yesterday, with patently unbelievable posts, which can happen in dementia patients. The less control he has about a situation, the most unhinged his posts become.
The rest of the world understand this. When is MAGA going to get it?
It’s genuinely terrifying that the world is now at the mercy of his dementia. There’s no way Iran can make a deal with him or trust that he won’t break it the very next day.
Which is why Iran is holding the Persian Gulf hostage. 20% less oil means the world cannot function (sadly, with East and South Asian countries first to suffer). Trump will be forced to make a deal at some point, even though the US is better equipped than most other nations to survive an oil squeeze, just because the American population are spoiled brats who can't deal with any pain or shortages. Whereas the Iranian regime is not afraid of dire shortages because its population is used to suffering.
It's a game of chicken, and Trump is known to TACO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Is everyone convinced now that Trump is delusional because of his dementia? He had a manic episode yesterday, with patently unbelievable posts, which can happen in dementia patients. The less control he has about a situation, the most unhinged his posts become.
The rest of the world understand this. When is MAGA going to get it?
It’s genuinely terrifying that the world is now at the mercy of his dementia. There’s no way Iran can make a deal with him or trust that he won’t break it the very next day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fun part comes when the ships are carrying oil to China.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Seize commercial ships on international waters”????!!!!
If they are Iran linked, then yep.
Trump is scared of China. And he wants his summit with Xi next month to go well. The US is becoming increasingly irrelevant to China as they build a modern military while moving away from a dependency on oil. China is all in with renewables. And their new fifth generation fighters do seem capable. Plus, China can do so much damage to the US economically. I don't think Trump would seize tankers going to China. That is taking escalation to a whole new level. But you never know with Trump/Vance/Hegseth/Rubio. They have proven to be idiots over and over again.
China has all the raw mineral earth materials needed for our airplanes, rockets, phones, computers, drones, nuclear facilities, and more. How in the world did our leaders, past and present, allow this to occur is beyond all comprehension.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a bit inaccurate to say Iran "opens" the strait of Hormuz. Would it not be more accurate to say Iran stops terrorizing free passage in the strait of Hormuz? You don't really close something you do not own. It's like saying a terrorist reopens a street just because they stopped shooting everyone who walks down it. We don't say "terrorist reopens street". We say "terrorist stops threatening the area."
It's a bit inaccurate to say that the US was engaged in war with Iran. Would it not be more accurate to say that they were engaged in a terrorist campaign against Iran?
No, it actually wouldn't. Attacking a belligerent, fanatical, tyrannical, murderous terrorist state in order to get it to stop being a terrorist state is hardly engaging in a terrorist campaign. But nice try.
No Trump and the Republicans attacked Iran because Israel told them to attack. Every accusation against Iran are things Israel and the US have and continue to do Iran- terrorists attacks inside Iran, attack Iran with proxies, bomb Iran, blow up embassies, assassinations, etc, etc. Isreal is many time worst vs Iran yet you ignore it. Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any fellow American who supports the idea of interdiction and piracy of foreign assets in territorial waters or even the open sea is squarely part of the problem with our empire.
This is exactly what we did in Venezuela and it worked. So I’m all for interdiction of any Iranian ships unless and until an agreement is reached.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any fellow American who supports the idea of interdiction and piracy of foreign assets in territorial waters or even the open sea is squarely part of the problem with our empire.
This is exactly what we did in Venezuela and it worked. So I’m all for interdiction of any Iranian ships unless and until an agreement is reached.
Anonymous wrote:The fun part comes when the ships are carrying oil to China.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Seize commercial ships on international waters”????!!!!
If they are Iran linked, then yep.