Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
It’s weird though. This whole Iran fiasco is unpopular with MAGA because it directly contravenes the entire America First principle. So who is DCUM MAGA shilling for?
They never actually believed any of those so-called principles. It was always a lie
I disagree. I think war is the one thing maga is upset about regarding Trump. 27% of the country support this war. About 50% of the country is maga (maybe a bit more)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iraqi’s using bulldozers in an attempt to storm the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad this morning!
lol…seem to be going well.
But MAGA said everyone loves what Trump is doing. How could this be?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
It’s weird though. This whole Iran fiasco is unpopular with MAGA because it directly contravenes the entire America First principle. So who is DCUM MAGA shilling for?
They never actually believed any of those so-called principles. It was always a lie
I disagree. I think war is the one thing maga is upset about regarding Trump. 27% of the country support this war. About 50% of the country is maga (maybe a bit more)
50% of the country isn't maga. Thats not possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
It’s weird though. This whole Iran fiasco is unpopular with MAGA because it directly contravenes the entire America First principle. So who is DCUM MAGA shilling for?
They never actually believed any of those so-called principles. It was always a lie
I disagree. I think war is the one thing maga is upset about regarding Trump. 27% of the country support this war. About 50% of the country is maga (maybe a bit more)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
It’s weird though. This whole Iran fiasco is unpopular with MAGA because it directly contravenes the entire America First principle. So who is DCUM MAGA shilling for?
They never actually believed any of those so-called principles. It was always a lie
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Libs love Iranian suppression of women and gays.
What they hate is freedom and capitalism.
Trump is a existential threat
WTF is wrong with you? What Dem has praised Iranian suppression of women and gays? Cite specifics.
What threads on this forum have numerous posts denouncing it?
That’s like asking what threads here have the Maga’s come out against pedophilia.
What are you defending again?
Anonymous wrote:Big party at War-Lago this weekend! After dancing to God Bless the USA, Trump was busy commanding the Epic Fury operation, and wooing his $1,000,000-per-person super PAC donors.
They moved on to celebrating the deaths of ~165 elementary school girls plus 96 injured in Minab, Iran.
Israel's military said it was "not aware" of any IDF operations in the area.
No glasses were raised for the 3 dead service members or 5 others seriously injured. Trump said, “there will be more. That’s the way it goes.” Guess that was his toast for those suckers and losers.
Breaking news: Some Iranian official just said “no negotiations”.
Stay tuned, maybe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.
And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.
You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.
It ahs been barely 24 hours. There is no winning or losing at this juncture.
Of course there is, unless one is being absurdly pedantic.
Decapitating the regime (confirmed) and substantially degrading their force projection and defensive capabilities (apparently) = winning.
Doesn’t mean that it’s “over”, but it is winning.
DP. Where did you hear or read that the regime has been decapitated and that it has been confirmed? That’s not what I’ve been reading and I read a broad range of sources.
NY Times, BBC, Guardian, WaPo, Economist, etc.
Suggest expanding your reading list.
I read those and more. Do you have any specific cites?
Sure you do.
Follow this link for a chart from the NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/world/middleeast/iran-leadership-khamenei-shamkhani-pakpour-nasirzadeh.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QFA.uK5h.bL5P_6D_-NW7&smid=url-share
And? So? The confirmed death of the ayatollah and some high ranking officials does not mean that the existing governmental structure won’t continue after it is reconstituted. They have a constitution and a succession plan. The second paragraph in your link says:
“It is unclear which of the Ayatollah’s possible successors might rise. Ali Larijani, Iran’s top national security official, said that the president, the head of the judiciary and a member of the Council of Guardians, a powerful group of jurists, would temporarily govern until a new leader was chosen.”
The ayatollah will be replaced and so will the roles of the people who were killed. Trump himself said he is fine with an outcome that looks like Venezuela—head guy is gone but governing structure remains intact. Did you think the US was actually going to execute a complete regime change?
Check out the definition of decapitated, then lmk if you think this merits further pedantic dillholery.
The head has been cut off, but the body (especially the backbone of the IRGC) is still functioning for now. Ditto the Venezuelan government.
It’s all about the IRGC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.
And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.
You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.
It ahs been barely 24 hours. There is no winning or losing at this juncture.
Of course there is, unless one is being absurdly pedantic.
Decapitating the regime (confirmed) and substantially degrading their force projection and defensive capabilities (apparently) = winning.
Doesn’t mean that it’s “over”, but it is winning.
DP. Where did you hear or read that the regime has been decapitated and that it has been confirmed? That’s not what I’ve been reading and I read a broad range of sources.
NY Times, BBC, Guardian, WaPo, Economist, etc.
Suggest expanding your reading list.
I read those and more. Do you have any specific cites?
Sure you do.
Follow this link for a chart from the NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/world/middleeast/iran-leadership-khamenei-shamkhani-pakpour-nasirzadeh.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QFA.uK5h.bL5P_6D_-NW7&smid=url-share
And? So? The confirmed death of the ayatollah and some high ranking officials does not mean that the existing governmental structure won’t continue after it is reconstituted. They have a constitution and a succession plan. The second paragraph in your link says:
“It is unclear which of the Ayatollah’s possible successors might rise. Ali Larijani, Iran’s top national security official, said that the president, the head of the judiciary and a member of the Council of Guardians, a powerful group of jurists, would temporarily govern until a new leader was chosen.”
The ayatollah will be replaced and so will the roles of the people who were killed. Trump himself said he is fine with an outcome that looks like Venezuela—head guy is gone but governing structure remains intact. Did you think the US was actually going to execute a complete regime change?
Check out the definition of decapitated, then lmk if you think this merits further pedantic dillholery.
The head has been cut off, but the body (especially the backbone of the IRGC) is still functioning for now. Ditto the Venezuelan government.
It’s all about the IRGC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow DCUM MAGA sure is freaked out about how unpopular this warmongering is.
Looks to me more like DCUM America haters are freaked out bc the US isn’t losing a war.
And FWIW, I’m opposed to this action. But since it’s a fait accompli, I’m sure as hell hoping it succeeds.
You and the “Death to America” crowd apparently feel otherwise.
It ahs been barely 24 hours. There is no winning or losing at this juncture.
Of course there is, unless one is being absurdly pedantic.
Decapitating the regime (confirmed) and substantially degrading their force projection and defensive capabilities (apparently) = winning.
Doesn’t mean that it’s “over”, but it is winning.
DP. Where did you hear or read that the regime has been decapitated and that it has been confirmed? That’s not what I’ve been reading and I read a broad range of sources.
NY Times, BBC, Guardian, WaPo, Economist, etc.
Suggest expanding your reading list.
I read those and more. Do you have any specific cites?
Sure you do.
Follow this link for a chart from the NYT:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/28/world/middleeast/iran-leadership-khamenei-shamkhani-pakpour-nasirzadeh.html?unlocked_article_code=1.QFA.uK5h.bL5P_6D_-NW7&smid=url-share
And? So? The confirmed death of the ayatollah and some high ranking officials does not mean that the existing governmental structure won’t continue after it is reconstituted. They have a constitution and a succession plan. The second paragraph in your link says:
“It is unclear which of the Ayatollah’s possible successors might rise. Ali Larijani, Iran’s top national security official, said that the president, the head of the judiciary and a member of the Council of Guardians, a powerful group of jurists, would temporarily govern until a new leader was chosen.”
The ayatollah will be replaced and so will the roles of the people who were killed. Trump himself said he is fine with an outcome that looks like Venezuela—head guy is gone but governing structure remains intact. Did you think the US was actually going to execute a complete regime change?
Check out the definition of decapitated, then lmk if you think this merits further pedantic dillholery.
The head has been cut off, but the body (especially the backbone of the IRGC) is still functioning for now. Ditto the Venezuelan government.